«While Qualcomm may object to this litigation strategy as duplicative, the Court will not conclude that Apple's exercise of
its rights under foreign laws is vexatious.»
Not exact matches
The materials on the Glass Lewis Site, including without limitation any and all text, software, scripts, graphics, photos, sounds, music, videos, interactive features and the like and the trademarks, service marks and logos contained therein, are owned by or licensed to Glass Lewis, subject to copyright and other intellectual property
rights under United States and
foreign laws and international conventions.
All of the content on the Sites and the Applications («Materials») and the trademarks, service marks, and logos contained on the Sites and the Applications, are owned by or licensed to us and are subject to copyright and other intellectual property
rights under United States and
foreign laws and international conventions.
In February 2011,
Foreign Secretary William Hague confirmed that the EU had decided to continue the «Zimbabwe Restrictive and Appropriate Measures» in light of the fact that essential reforms to promote the rule of
law, human
rights and democracy, as agreed
under the Global Political Agreement, had not yet been implemented.
Under Spanish constitutional case
law, the Spanish authorities «indirectly» violate the Constitution if they give effect to a
foreign authority's decision that infringes the «absolute content» of a fundamental
right.
Also, the real kicker is that the applicant fails to show that its human
rights and free speech promoting activities would be legal
under foreign countries»
laws (I'm sure they simply forgot to ask Iran, Egypt, Turkey and North Korea).
Atlas Bulk Shipping A / S v Navios International Inc (2011) Instructed on an appeal to the Court of Appeal concerning
rights of set - off
under Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model
Law and Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 and the ability of the English Court to grant additional relief upon recognition of a
foreign insolvency proceeding (with Richard Snowden QC).
foreign states are not entitled to immunity
under customary international
law as to most, if not all, activity that constitutes human
rights offenses.
In reality, this reservation is more theoretical than anything else, because codified French arbitration
law itself does not contain any such limitation, and article VII (1) of the Convention confirms that the Convention does not deprive parties of more favourable
rights they might enjoy
under the
law of the country in which enforcement of the
foreign award is sought.
In many respects the changing attitude toward international
law, headed by the House of Lords
under the unmistakable leadership of Lord Bingham, has provided an example for other national courts (NCs) to follow, starting in 2004 with the so - called Belmarsh Detainees judgment, that stunning 8 - 1 majority declaration that found the detention of
foreign suspected terrorists incompatible with the Human
Rights Act.
Tomorrow, the U.S. Supreme Court hears an incredibly important case called Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, stemming from a federal lawsuit brought
under the Alien Tort statute, a remarkable federal
law that allows people from countries outside the United States to sue
foreign individuals and multinational corporations that commit human
rights violations abroad - like torture, crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, disappearances, summary execution, that kind of thing.
The letter references the 141 page report
Foreign Policy Practicum 2007 - 08 (PDF) from the University of Ottawa Faculty of
Law, entitled «Repatriation of Omar Khadr to be Tried
under Canadian
Law: An Overview of the Case Against Omar Khadr and the Prospect of Canadian Criminal Jurisdiction, Brief Submitted to Senate Standing Committee on Human
Rights» (January 2008).
Apart from acting as counsel in commercial and investment arbitrations, Daniela's practice is focused on advising clients doing business in Latin America on the protection of their investment and potential avenues to enforce its
rights as
foreign investors
under international
law.
The Federal Court of Canada released a landmark decision finding that the court has the jurisdiction to make an extra-territorial order with world - wide effects against a
foreign resident requiring the
foreign person to remove documents containing personal information about a Canadian citizen that violates the person's
rights under Canada's privacy
law, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
All present and future
rights in and to trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, know - how, and other proprietary
rights of any type
under the
laws of any governmental authority, domestic or
foreign, including without limitation
rights in and to all applications and registrations relating to the Services shall, as between you and How - To Geek, at all times be and remain the sole and exclusive property of How - To Geek.