Not exact matches
There is no doubt in my mind that this is one of the worst defeats
under the
tenure of Arsene Wenger, and it comes at an increasingly worrying time, when nothing seems to be going
right at the club.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled that a school district's failure to provide
tenured public - school teachers with a hearing prior to dismissal violates the teachers» due - process
rights under the 14th Amendment.
Staff
rights under state and federal law related to
tenure, seniority, evaluation, staff discipline, collective bargaining, and employment discrimination;
Under current state law, districts must decide by March of the second year whether to grant teachers permanent status or
tenure, which provides due - process
rights and job protections.
Each state sets its own laws governing teacher
tenure, dismissal and layoff policies, and the
rights the students assert are given
under the state constitution, so similar efforts will come in state courts.
Ms. Strauss has covered education in the District and has every
right to share her opinion of what hasn't worked
under Michelle Rhee's
tenure.
LOS ANGELES — A California judge ruled Tuesday that teacher
tenure laws deprived students of their
right to an education
under the State Constitution and violated their civil
rights.
The Wright v. New York case was first filed in 2014, when nine families from across the state brought suit against the State of New York and others, claiming that teacher
tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their
right to a sound basic education as guaranteed
under the New York State Constitution.
Still, he has fallen short on other measures that might have given the state better grades by Rhee's standards, including his stalled proposal for a school - voucher program and his failed bid to end teacher seniority
rights under the new
tenure law.
Last month, a California judge in Vergara v. State of California ruled that teacher
tenure laws deprive students of their
right to an education
under the state Constitution and violate their civil
rights.
Based on a 20 - year period ending December 31, 2017, the median long -
tenured, actively managed large - cap fund has outperformed the S&P 500 Index 58 % of the time.3 The chart to the
right illustrates an AMG Yacktman Fund investor's over or
under performance versus the S&P 500 Index based on a rolling 3 - or 10 - year investment.
Recent advisory work includes advising on the strength of a claim to a
right of way by prescription of residential land; advising on the scope of a restrictive covenant contained in a transfer of freehold land; advising a prospective vendor on an aborted conveyance of land; advising on security of
tenure under the Rent Act 1977; advising in respect of a nuisance claim concerning an interference with a
right of way; advising a commercial landlord in respect of a tenant's breach of user covenant; and advising in a claim for rectification of the title to the property in respect of a void transfer.
(judicial review arising from failures of due process in the Bar's disciplinary arrangements discovered by a report by COIC in 2012; time expired disciplinary judges — whether a tribunal «established by law»
under ECHR Art. 6 and Art. 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental
Rights; whether Art 47 now has direct effect in UK; whether laid down selection process of disciplinary judges had to be followed at all; whether prosecutor could partake in selection process of disciplinary judges; whether a disciplinary judge could properly receive an undisclosed salary from the prosecutor; whether logjam in Visitorial appeals process caused unlawful delay; whether proper Art. 6 security of
tenure when BSB sits on committee (COIC) with the power to remove disciplinary judges from the «pool» at will; whether «discreditable» conduct should be defined).
The NIC discusses the potential consequences and possible benefits of adjustments to the forms of land
tenure held
under the various existing Land
Rights legislation and Native Title legislation.
In such a case the
rights under the non-Indigenous
tenure, and the doing of any activity in giving effect to them, prevail over the native title
rights and interests but do not extinguish them.
However, the Court did countenance the situation where native title
rights were not inconsistent with the
rights created
under the grant of non-Indigenous
tenures yet the «doing of any activity in giving effect to them» [25] conflicted with the native title
rights in question.
Where native title existed in its own
right under the common law or where native title co-existed with other
tenures - the native title could not result in the extinguishment or any derogation whatsoever of any
rights granted by the Crown or by legislation.