(4) The public body seeking recognition or claiming enforcement of a decision shall upon request furnish any document necessary to establish
its right under paragraph 2 and that benefits have been provided to the creditor.
(ii) If applicable, a statement of the individual's review
rights under paragraph (a)(4) of this section, including a description of how the individual may exercise such review rights; and
The special enrollment
rights under this paragraph (b) apply without regard to the dates on which an individual would otherwise be able to enroll under the plan.
Not exact matches
These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «
Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary
rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described
under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
As was said in the opening
paragraph of this series, a well - rehearsed interpretation of UKIP is that they are a grouping to the
right of the current Conservative party, dissatisfied with the old party's failure to stand up to Europe and its perceived leftwards shift
under Cameron.
-- If the Secretary makes a payment
under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall be subrogated to the
rights of the recipient of the payment as specified in the guarantee or related agreements including, if appropriate, the authority (notwithstanding any other provision of law)--
in the case of an unaccompanied youth, ensure that the local educational agency liaison assists in placement or enrollment decisions
under this
paragraph, including coordination with the committee on special education for students with disabilities pursuant to section 200.4 of this Title, considers the views of such unaccompanied youth, and provides notice to such youth of the
right to appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 11432 (g)(3)(E)(ii)(Public Law 107 - 110, title X, section 1032, 115 STAT.
-- Each Federal agency that has responsibility
under paragraph (2) for implementing this Act may render technical assistance to individuals and institutions that have
rights or duties
under the respective title or titles for which such agency has responsibility.
-- The Committee on Rules and Administration shall ensure that Senate employees are informed of their
rights under the Acts referred to in
paragraph (2).
-- Each Federal agency that has responsibility
under paragraph (2) for implementing this Act shall, as part of its implementation responsibilities, ensure the availability and provision of appropriate technical assistance manuals to individuals or entities with
rights or duties
under this Act no later than six months after applicable final regulations are published
under titles I, II, III, and IV.
-- The
rights and protections
under this Act shall, subject to
paragraph (2), apply with respect to the conduct of each instrumentality of the Congress.
The
right of a judgment debtor to accelerate payment of part or all of the death benefit or special surrender value
under a life insurance policy, as authorized by
paragraph one of subsection (a) of one thousand one hundred thirteen of the insurance law [* see below], or to enter into a viatical settlement pursuant to the provisions of article seventy - eight of the insurance law, is exempt from application to the satisfaction of a money judgment.
Detailed — Handicapped Persons § 30 -4-2 (2) Every person engaged in the training of a guide dog or service dog for the purpose of accompanying a person as provided in
paragraph (1) of this subsection shall have the same
right to be accompanied by such dog being trained as the totally or partially blind person, deaf person, or physically disabled person has
under paragraph (1) of this subsection, so long as such trainer is identified as an agent or employee of a school for seeing eye, hearing, service, or guide dogs.
I may be misreading your second
paragraph, did you mean that the witness is only required to answer
under subpeona, but
under subpeona are only allowed to refuse to answer if the question would require dislcouse of privileged information or violate a 5th Amendment
right?
Subject to
paragraph 2, a Contracting State may at any time designate an entity or entities in its territory as the entry point or entry points through which there shall or may be transmitted to the International Registry information required for registration other than registration of a notice of a national interest or a
right or interest
under Article 40 in either case arising
under the laws of another State.
In the following
paragraphs, the Court then examined the penalty system in the light of EU fundamental
rights, but found it — essentially based on its features as already set out previously
under Article 12 of the Directive — to be compatible with the principles of effective judicial protection and respect for the
rights of the defence.
In proceedings to which the European Union is a co-respondent, if the Court of Justice of the European Union has not yet assessed the compatibility with the Convention
rights at issue of the provision of European Union law as
under paragraph 2 of this Article, sufficient time shall be afforded for the Court of Justice of the European Union to make such an assessment, and thereafter for the parties to make observations to the Court.
She went on to consider whether the child was being detained
under the interim care order and concluded that the child's present situation did not breach her
rights under Article 29 of the VCDR [
paragraphs 32 and 35].
In that regard, it has already been established, in
paragraphs 32 and 36 of the present judgment, that Directive 85/337 confers on the individuals concerned a
right to have the effects on the environment of the project
under examination assessed by the competent services, and that pecuniary damage, in so far as it is a direct economic consequence of the environmental effects of a public or private project, is covered by the objective of protection pursued by Directive 85/337.
-- the petition of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, requesting an investigation into whether Item 1 of
Paragraph 1 of Article 1 and Item 1 of
Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Republic of Lithuania's Law on Citizenship to the extent that it provides that the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states, shall retain the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time, and whether
Paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Republic of Lithuania's Law on the Implementation of the Law on Citizenship are not in conflict with
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 29 and
Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state
under the rule of law.
-- the provision «the following persons shall retain the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time: (1) persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states» of
Paragraph 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship, to the extent that, according to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, it entrenches that the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania shall not be retained to the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren, provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have repatriated, and who are residing in other states, is not in conflict with Article 29 and
Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state
under the rule of law;
The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, requests an investigation into whether Item 1 of
Paragraph 1 of Article 1 and Item 1 of
Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship, to the extent that it provides that the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states, shall retain the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time, and whether
Paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Law on the Implementation of the Law on Citizenship are not in conflict with
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 29 and
Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution, and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state
under the rule of law.
Having held that the provision «provided that these persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated» of Item 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of
Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship is in conflict with Article 29 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principle of a state
under the rule of law, the Constitutional Court will not further investigate whether the provision «the following persons shall retain the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time: (1) persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states» of
Paragraph 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of Article 17 of this law to the extent that, according to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, it entrenches that the
right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania shall not be retained to persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren who reside in other states, provided that these persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have repatriated, is not in conflict with
Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principle of justice.
For example, the Appeals Officer recognized that if the employer does not own the buildings nor has a
right to alter them, an employer can not ensure that those buildings meet prescribed standards, as required
under paragraph (a).
Therefore, her
right to manifest her religion
under Article 9 was violated and it was not necessary to examine the claim
under article 14 separately (
paragraph 95).
(3) However, in the case of a ruling on the validity of an intellectual property
right other than copyright or a related
right, recognition or enforcement of a judgment may be refused or postponed
under the preceding
paragraph only where -
In Good Spirit School Division No. 204 v Christ the Teacher Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 212, 2017 SKQB 109, the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench held that funding Catholic schools, and no others, for educating students who do not belong to their religion is contrary to the guarantee of the freedom of religion in
paragraph 2 (a) of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, and not justified
under the Charter «s section 1.
Under Article 21 (1) TFEU, the
right of every citizen of the Union to reside in the territory of the Member States is recognised subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaty and by the measures adopted for its implementation (see, to that effect, Trojani,
paragraphs 31 and 32; Case C ‑ 200 / 02 Zhu and Chen [2004] ECR I ‑ 9925,
paragraph 26; and Case C ‑ 291 / 05 Eind [2007] ECR I ‑ 10719,
paragraph 28).
EEA citizens who enjoy a
right of residence
under European Union law (
Paragraphs 51 and 52) must, if they are residing in Austria for longer than three months, notify the authority within four months of their entry.
Under Paragraph 6 (4) of the FreizügG / EU, loss of the
right to enter and reside in Germany may be determined, after a
right to permanent residence has been acquired, only on serious grounds.
If access is denied on a ground permitted
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the individual has the
right to have the denial reviewed by a licensed health care professional who is designated by the covered entity to act as a reviewing official and who did not participate in the original decision to deny.
At
paragraph 51 of its decision, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the ability of employees to strike is essential to meaningful collective bargaining and that, in the circumstances of that case, the
right to strike was constitutionally protected
under section 2 (d) of the Charter.
There is discussion (twice) about the Church of England but the ECHR and Human
Rights Act 1998 is relegated to a passing reference in a
paragraph towards the end
under the heading «Other constitutional reforms».»
If the buyer takes possession of the goods
under this
paragraph, his
rights and obligations are governed by the preceding
paragraph.
Smlouvyo 4,
paragraph 2 of the European Union and Article 3,
paragraph 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (or Article 4 of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004), the fact that the Czech authorities could zaokolností what vprojednávané things, provide preferential treatment (kdávce compensatory allowance at the age where the amount of benefits granted
under Article 20 of the Treaty concluded 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and the Slovak Republic on Social Security and Council Regulation (EC) No 1408 to 1471 (Regulation č.883 / 2004) lower than the dose that would be received, if the pension calculated
under the laws of the Czech Republic), only citizens of the Czech Republic, if ktakovému treatment creates a fundamental
right to security in old age unloaded by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic specifically in relation kdobám pension acquired vzaniklé CSFR and perceived as part of the national identity, and, if such treatment is stonarušit
right of free movement of workers as a fundamental
right of the Union, a situation kdybyposkytnutí reciprocal treatment accorded to nationals of EU Member States kteřítakézískali vzaniklé CSFR equivalent of pension security led kvýznamnému threat from the financial stability of the pension fund of the Czech Republic?
We propose to amend this
paragraph by adding a sentence to clarify that, to the extent the enrollee has the
right to cancel the coverage
under applicable State laws, including «free look» cancellation laws — that is, laws permitting cancellation within a certain period of time, even following effectuation of the enrollment, the enrollee may do so, in accordance with the requirements of such laws.
We proposed to amend this
paragraph by adding a sentence to clarify that, to the extent the enrollee has the
right to cancel the coverage
under applicable State laws, including «free look» cancellation laws — that is, laws permitting cancellation within a certain period of time, even following effectuation of the enrollment, the enrollee may do so, in accordance with the requirements of such laws.
You have a typo
under heading
Right Place
Right Time, the last
paragraph.
I advice breaking it into a few bullet points instead of the outdated
paragraph format; position this
right under your name.
The Human
Rights Committee confirms that specific cultural rights held by a certain group are «conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups and [are]... distinct from, and additional to, all the other rights which, as individuals in common with everyone else, they are already entitled to enjoy under the Covenant [of Civil and Political Rights]», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
Rights Committee confirms that specific cultural
rights held by a certain group are «conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups and [are]... distinct from, and additional to, all the other rights which, as individuals in common with everyone else, they are already entitled to enjoy under the Covenant [of Civil and Political Rights]», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights held by a certain group are «conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups and [are]... distinct from, and additional to, all the other
rights which, as individuals in common with everyone else, they are already entitled to enjoy under the Covenant [of Civil and Political Rights]», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights which, as individuals in common with everyone else, they are already entitled to enjoy
under the Covenant [of Civil and Political
Rights]», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
Rights]», General Comment 23 The
rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights of minorities (8 April 1994)
paragraph 1.
The Human
Rights Committee, in relation to minority and Indigenous rights under ICCPR explained that countries joining ICCPR must take steps to protect those rights «With regard to the exercise of the cultural rights protected under article 27, the Committee observes that culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of Indigenous peoples... The enjoyment of those rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
Rights Committee, in relation to minority and Indigenous
rights under ICCPR explained that countries joining ICCPR must take steps to protect those rights «With regard to the exercise of the cultural rights protected under article 27, the Committee observes that culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of Indigenous peoples... The enjoyment of those rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights under ICCPR explained that countries joining ICCPR must take steps to protect those
rights «With regard to the exercise of the cultural rights protected under article 27, the Committee observes that culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of Indigenous peoples... The enjoyment of those rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights «With regard to the exercise of the cultural
rights protected under article 27, the Committee observes that culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of Indigenous peoples... The enjoyment of those rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights protected
under article 27, the Committee observes that culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of Indigenous peoples... The enjoyment of those
rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights may require positive legal measures of protection», General Comment 23 The
rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragr
rights of minorities (8 April 1994)
paragraph 7.
In relation to Australia's compliance with the
right to self - determination
under Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR) the HRC stated at
paragraph 9 of its Concluding Observations:
Add.105, 7/4/99, paras 7,8; HRC, Concluding Observations: Norway, UN Doc: CCPR / C / 79 / Add.112, 05/11/99, paras 10 and 17, which provides (at para 17) that «the Committee expects Norway to report on the Sami people's
right to self - determination
under Article 1 of the Covenant, including
paragraph 2 of that article».
(16) Nothing in this Act affects the operation of an agreement sanctioned
under paragraph 87 (1)(k) of the repealed Act or the
rights and obligations of a person
under such an agreement.
The HRC has confirmed that different
rights for vulnerable and disadvantaged groups are permissible
under the ICCPR at
paragraph 10 of General Comment 18.
While the Australian government denies that Indigenous people in Australia are a people, entitled to the
right of self - determination, the Human
Rights Committee, in July 2000, at
paragraph 9 of its Concluding Observations about Australia's performance
under ICCPR (see attachment B) clearly recognized that the
right of self - determination does apply to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.