Sentences with phrase «rigorous review of data»

Not exact matches

They had to come up with an idea, submit a proposal, pass a competitive peer review at NASA, raise money, design the equipment, put it together, make sure it passed NASA's rigorous safety precautions, and, of course, collect data on the flight — all work for which they received no course credit.

In order to make this work, the authors describe necessary steps of a rigorous informed consent process that outlines the risks and uncertainties, close involvement of institutional review boards, and multicenter trials to collect data.

However, in our review of these Single Plans with LAUSD families, it is clear that many of the plans do not reflect the type of rigorous root cause analysis, data analysis, evaluation of current programs and strategies, goal setting with aligned strategies and resource allocation that will serve to improve outcomes.

I lead a team of senior portfolio managers through a rigorous process where we revisit our priors, incorporate our firm's latest views and review recent industry - related data and research.

Imagine if you will, someone like me arguing evidence for AGW coming to CFACT and citing an article from, not a top - tier journal, nor even a second - tier, but more like a third - tier journal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowd here.

A paper reporting a «rigorous double blind» study — the VIGOR trial — was submitted to NEJM in 1998, got through peer review at one of the most up - tight journals in the world of medicine, and — by way of cherry - picking the data submitted (selecting out some study subjects whose adverse events histories which, if considered, would've significantly affected the safety profile for rofecoxib and revealed something that Merck really didn't want us prescribers to learn about their «blockbuster» product — was published to be touted by Merck's marketing weevils as solid proofs of Vioxx's tolerability, efficacy, and safety.

These include a dedicated team of privacy professionals who are involved in new product and feature development from design through launch; ongoing review and monitoring of the way data is handled by existing features and apps; and rigorous data security practices.