I do not see the algorithms ordinarily used to extract the growth curve including any paramter that would account for the tree
ring response to climate changing as the tree rings age..
They note, quite correctly, that the tree -
ring response to climate changes much more dramatically between the two time periods than the density response.
Not exact matches
[
Response: Since you mention Buntgen et al 2014 and the AD 774 event, I would also refer readers
to our piece last year in Nature
Climate Change, «Missing tree
rings and the AD 774 — 775 radiocarbon event».
With respect
to tree
ring analysis, which is the basis for the vast majority of terrestrial reconstructions, the two most primary issues are (1) whether linear relationships between driver (
climate) and
response (
ring characteristic) can in fact be assumed monotonic (usually, linearly so).
Climate response to the De Vries solar cycle in tree -
ring chronologies over the past 2000 years.
[Joana Vieira, Filipe Campelo, Cristina Nabais (2008) Age - dependent
responses of tree -
ring growth and intra-annual density fluctuations of Pinus pinaster
to Mediterranean
climate.
Tree -
ring information is available only in terrestrial regions, so is not available over substantial regions of the globe, and the
climate signals contained in tree -
ring density or width data reflect a complex biological
response to climate forcing.
Although the existence of an upside down quadratic
response to temperature has been known for a long time (e.g., Fritts 1976), current tree
ring - based reconstructions universally assume that a linear approximation is not problematic, which is equivalent
to the assumption that past
climates do not deviate far from those in the calibration period, as will be shown.
A number of tree -
ring chronologies have displayed anomalous growth or changed
responses to climate forcing on different time scales in very recent decades (3 — Briffa et al 1998 (Nature), 9 — Jacoby and D'Arrigo 1995).