Ice - rafted debris occurs in greater abundances on the continental slope and
rise during interglacial periods during the Late Pleistocene, with more varied stone lithologies [32 - 34].
«The hypothesis that the CO2
rise during the interglacials caused the temperature to rise requires an increase of about 6 °C per 30 % rise in CO2 as seen in the ice core record.
Not exact matches
During the last
Interglacial period the sea
rose sixty - five feet above current levels.
Until now it had been assumed that thermophilic reptiles survived the Ice Ages only on the southern peninsulas of Europe and spread northward once the temperatures
rose again
during the Holocene and the
interglacial periods.
The fact that ice sheets will respond to warming is not in doubt (note the 4 - 6 m sea level
rise during the last
interglacial), but the speed at which that might happen is highly uncertain, though the other story this week shows it is ongoing.
In a study out of the University of Arizona, researchers found that melting ice sheets had a greater impact on sea level
rise than the thermal expansion of the oceans
during the previous
interglacial period 125,000 years ago.
The latter events left behind distinctive rock - sequences typically consisting of tillites (ancient boulder - clay, now solid rock) representing ice - deposited debris, overlain with a depositional break by cap - carbonates (chemical sediments of marine origin deposited
during interglacials following global sea - level
rises).
For example, Hansen & Sato argued that since GAT
during the Eemian (last
interglacial before the present) was only slightly higher (less than 1 degree C) and sea levels 4 - 6 meters higher, a 2 degree
rise in GAT in the near future will result flooding very quickly.
There is lots of evidence out there which suggests that rapid mluti - meter SLR does occur: High rates of sea - level
rise during the last
interglacial period http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n1/full/ngeo.2007.28.html
It would require a much stronger relationship of temperature driving CO2 than occurred
during the ice age —
interglacial oscillations (and it is also important to remember that those changes occurred over much longer timescales too... which is the presumed reason why there is a several hundred year lag time between temperatures starting to
rise or fall and CO2 starting to
rise or fall).
On the global mean sea level
rise during the last
interglacial period (129,000 to 116,000 years ago), the UK, Austria, US, Germany and others supported providing a policy relevant context and linking paleoclimatic observations on sea level
rise to temperature.
Quantitatively, Vasskog et al. estimate that
during this time (the prior
interglacial) the GrIS was «probably between ~ 7 and 60 % smaller than at present,» and that that melting contributed to a
rise in global sea level of «between 0.5 and 4.2 m.» Thus, in comparing the present
interglacial to the past
interglacial, atmospheric CO2 concentrations are currently 30 % higher, global temperatures are 1.5 - 2 °C cooler, GrIS volume is from 7 - 67 % larger, and global sea level is at least 0.5 - 4.2 m lower, none of which observations signal catastrophe for the present.
But
during these
interglacials the CO2 level was about 300 ppm, so I think the CO2 level had very little to do with the sea level
rise.
Scientists are confident CO2 was lower
during the ice ages and that its
rise was coupled to
rising temperatures when Earth moved to an
interglacial.
In sum, the conclusion of the Kopp study that 20th century sea level
rise was extremely likely faster than
during any of the 27 previous centuries is not substantiated, although there is little doubt that sea levels are higher than they have been since the last
interglacial period, the Eemian, about 115,000 to 130,000 years ago.
The authors find «a relatively low contribution to Last
Interglacial sea level rise from Greenland melting... The resistance of Greenland to thaw despite much higher temperatures [8 C] during the last interglacial led warmist blogger Andy Rivkin of the NY Times to remark,»... Greenland doesn't need «s
Interglacial sea level
rise from Greenland melting... The resistance of Greenland to thaw despite much higher temperatures [8 C]
during the last
interglacial led warmist blogger Andy Rivkin of the NY Times to remark,»... Greenland doesn't need «s
interglacial led warmist blogger Andy Rivkin of the NY Times to remark,»... Greenland doesn't need «saving»
Even if it has been warmer at times
during the current and previous
interglacials, showing that the forcing is unprecedented,
rising and currently overwhelming natural variation can be seen of itself to be sufficient cause for alarm (that it be overwhelming is not quite what the IPCC report states but the more than half post 1950 claim is similar).
222 Kurt M. Cuffey and Shawn J. Marshall, «Substantial contribution to sea - level
rise during the last
interglacial from the Greenland ice sheet,» Nature 404:591 - 594 (2000).
During the last
interglacial about 128,000 years ago, a range of hills in western Normandy was isolated by
rising sea level, becoming the island of Jersey.
This further complicates any attribution of trends in surface pH. For example upwelling of stored CO2 is believed to have been the main driver of the
rise in atmospheric CO2 and the fall in ocean surface pH
during the transition from the glacial maximum to our
interglacial.
In terms of global phenomena, it seems rather than regions which have always cooled and warmed
during global warming or cooling trends, the metric of
rising sea levels [which have been occurring throughout our current
interglacial period [10,000 years] should be metric used.
Predictions of future sea - level
rise and reduction in volume of ice sheets are consistent with what the evidence indicates
during the Last
Interglacial.
The observation that led to his conclusion was that in the ice core records
during interglacials methane
rises to a peak and then decreases as temperature
rises and falls.
During this
interglacial, methane
rose, peaked, started to decrease and then stopped decreasing and began increasing again starting about 5,000 years ago.
Misconception # 3 —
During the
interglacial periods changes in CO2 lag behind temperature
rises, so are not the cause for warming
The fact that ice sheets will respond to warming is not in doubt (note the 4 - 6 m sea level
rise during the last
interglacial), but the speed at which that might happen is highly uncertain, though the other story this week shows it is ongoing.
The latter events left behind distinctive rock - sequences typically consisting of tillites (ancient boulder - clay, now solid rock) representing ice - deposited debris, overlain with a depositional break by cap - carbonates, chemical sediments of marine origin deposited
during interglacials following global sea - level
rises.