Not exact matches
Unfortunately for policymakers and the public, while the basic science pointing to a
rising human influence on climate is clear, many of the most important questions will remain surrounded by deep complexity and uncertainty for a long time to come: the pace at which seas will
rise, the extent of warming from a certain buildup of greenhouse gases (
climate sensitivity), the impact
on hurricanes, the particular effects in particular places (what
global warming means for Addis Ababa or Atlanta).
Many of those promoting stasis in the face of a clear need for a
global energy quest have used this saga as a kind of «blackwash» that will long linger like a cloud, tainting public appreciation of even the undisputed basics of science pointing to a
rising human influence on climate.
Overall, I think we're
on the slow path toward integrating into our consciousness that
humans are, and will remain for generations, a
rising influence on the
global environment and the
climate system.
1995 discernible
human influence on global climate 2001 surface temperature projected to increase 1.4 - 5.8 C 1990 -2100, and sea level to rise by 0.1 - 0.9 meters 2007 (Nobel peace prize) Climate warming unequ
climate 2001 surface temperature projected to increase 1.4 - 5.8 C 1990 -2100, and sea level to
rise by 0.1 - 0.9 meters 2007 (Nobel peace prize)
Climate warming unequ
Climate warming unequivocal.