Sentences with phrase «rising in nominal terms»

Not exact matches

Comments: «S&P 500 sales, which are measured in nominal terms, will rise by 4.4 % in 2013 and 4.7 % in 2014.

They include upwards revisions in economic forecasts, expectation of monetary tightening, rising real and nominal long - term interest rates, fiscal stimulus on a huge scale in a full employment economy, rising protectionism that should choke off import flows, and tax reform directed at reducing capital outflows and increasing capital inflows.

Russian corporate profits rose by 38 % last year, but investment by only 4.5 % in nominal terms and fell 0,9 % in real terms.

Medium - term inflation expectations of financial market participants, as implied by the difference between nominal and indexed bond yields, have risen to around 3 per cent in October, from less than 2 per cent at the beginning of the year.

According to NIA, after the dot - com bubble had burst, the NYSE margin debt in nominal terms rose from its low of $ 130.21 billion in 2002 to a high of $ 381.37 billion in 2007 — that is a rise of 193 %.

In short, the investor of 2000 should feel robbed in «real» terms, despite a «nominal» rise in the Dow of 6.4 percenIn short, the investor of 2000 should feel robbed in «real» terms, despite a «nominal» rise in the Dow of 6.4 percenin «real» terms, despite a «nominal» rise in the Dow of 6.4 percenin the Dow of 6.4 percent!

What exactly do you see playing out in terms of negative nominal interest rates or just negative real interest rates with rising inflation?

After an extended period in which the economy contracted in nominal terms, nominal GDP also rose slightly over the year (Graph 4).

Retail spending is forecast to rise 3.6 per cent in nominal terms - in line with 2017, but well below the 20 - year average of 5.3 per cent.

Despite the sharp rise in inflation expectations, 10 - year breakevens (the difference between the yield on a nominal fixed - rate bond and the real yield on TIPS) remain depressed relative to their long - term history.

At a 10 - year Treasury yield of 1.7 %, interest on reserves of 0.25 %, and a monetary base now at about 18 cents per dollar of nominal GDP (see Run, Don't Walk), further purchases of long - term Treasury securities by the Fed would produce net losses for the Fed in any scenario where yields rise more than about 20 basis points a year, or the Fed ever has to unwind any portion of its already massive positions.

Dividend amounts rise steadily in terms of NOMINAL (without adjustments for inflation) dollars.

And while you might lose money in real terms if rates rise your probability of losing money in nominal terms is fairly low.

Think of 1979 - 82: by the time bond yields were nearing their peak levels, bond managers were making money in nominal terms with rates rising because the income from the coupons was so high, and it set up the tremendous rally in bonds that would last for ~ 30 years or so.

The economic effect will feel a little stagflationary, with wage rates improving in nominal terms, taxes rising to cover transfer payments, and assets being sold (to whom?)

These resources are developed at the supply end not the consumer end and electricity costs in nominal terms have risen for consumers by almost 100 % in about 20 years, but are generally competiive with fossil.