Sentences with phrase «risk children share»

Not exact matches

My mother is an early childhood educator who has had her share of experience with at - risk and special needs children.

If you'll be bed sharing, always make sure your child is free from any obstructions to his or her breathing as well as any risk of falling off the bed.

Following the judgment of the Hockenjos v. Secretary of State for Work & Pensions (21 December 2004), where the lack of financial support for non-resident parents who share care for children was found to be sex discrimination, the Childcare Strategy must address the barriers to sharing caring responsibilities in low - income families, where child poverty is a high risk.

Pastor Jimmy Bartz shares advice for parents on the best methods for dealing with a child who takes lots of risk behavior

We know that if a mother smokes, if she has consumed alcohol or other sedatives, if the baby is formula fed, if the sleep surface is a sofa or water bed, or if the bed is also shared with other children that a baby sleeping with his or her mother is at heightened risk of SIDS or accidental death.

To ensure that federal funds directed towards children at risk for hunger or food insecurity are used to provide meals that meet their nutritional needs, it is important that families who can afford to pay their fair share do so.

The AAP separates co-sleeping into two categories to better describe where the risk lies: · Bed - sharing: Sharing the same bed or sleep space with asharing: Sharing the same bed or sleep space with aSharing the same bed or sleep space with a child.

However, the American Academy of Pediatrics revised its safe sleep recommendations in October 2016, which clearly outline instances that have been shown to increase the risk of SIDS, unintentional death, or injury when sharing a bed with an infant or small child.

As with most medical topics, the definitive answer is unclear, although a lot of research supports the idea that bed - sharing may increase your child's risk of SIDS.

You could possibly get full custody of your children; however, Nevada family courts favor shared physical custody and are likely to grant each parent equal time with the children, unless the children are at risk of coming to harm in the presence of their other parent.

There isn't data confirming the safety or lack of safety of bed - sharing multiples, but other studies have shown that bed - sharing with other children places an infant at higher risk of SIDS.

Keeping your baby in a crib alongside your own bed gives your child his or her own separate and safe sleeping space without running the risks associated with bed sharing.

You could bed share, but until your child is a toddler, this may be very dangerous and could pose more risks than it's worth.

If not sharing a bed at all significantly reduces a child's risk of SIDS and a parent can do that and chooses to do that, that's great.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that infants should not share a bed with parents or other children to minimize the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advise caretakers to put infants to sleep on their backs and to avoid loose bedding, soft sleeping surfaces and bed sharing in order to reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), the leading cause of death in children between one month and one year of age.

As we shared earlier in Part 1, pregnant women and young children are most at risk of the dangers of fire retardant chemicals.

Not only do family trips create opportunities for families to bond through shared experiences, but they also provide situations that require children to take risks, try something new, and act brave, which can result in courage and greater confidence.

«That patients were more likely to share the «good» news with their child that a risk - conferring mutation in BRCA1 / 2 was not found upon genetic testing is consistent with other positive parenting practices,» write the authors.

There is a lower risk of SIDS when a baby room - shares with parents as compared to a baby sleeping alone in another room (solitary sleeping).43 Sleeping in a room with other children has no protective effect.

If you choose to disregard the AAP's advice regarding a shared sleeping space, please be aware that co-sleeping with anyone who smokes or drinks adds additional risk to the child.

Critics point to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) as a bed - sharing risk; the health dangers of going unvaccinated; and the potential difficulty of removing older children from their parents» beds.

Sharing a bed with your baby, the risk of rolling over on your child, how sleep - sharing might affect your sex life, aSharing a bed with your baby, the risk of rolling over on your child, how sleep - sharing might affect your sex life, asharing might affect your sex life, and more

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend against sharing a bed with a child under the age of 2, citing an increased risk of death from suffocation, SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), strangulation, or another unexplained cause.

Sharing a bed with an older child doesn't have the same risks as co-sleeping with your baby, but it can have a negative impact on your relationship with your partner and impact the quality of sleep you get.

The authors found that children who had bed - shared during infancy (at age two months) did not have a higher risk of wheezing during their first six years of life, or of getting diagnosed with asthma.

«In the unique world of children's surgery, we can now accurately obtain and share risk - adjusted outcomes in a way that will allow institutions to take actions that are going to improve patient care,» said Dr. Moss, who also is the E. Thomas Boles Jr..

Sharing a meal with friends and family strengthens relationships, improves mental health (especially in teenagers), reduces stress, can reduce children's risk of substance abuse, and may even get «em to eat more veggies.

During the discussion in Weissbourd's Developing Effective School and Community Interventions for At - Risk Children course, Menino shared his opinion that the biggest challenge facing education is changing the focus from teachers or schools needing money to what's going on at home with students and...

During the discussion in Weissbourd's Developing Effective School and Community Interventions for At - Risk Children course, Menino shared his opinion that the biggest challenge facing education is changing the focus from teachers or schools needing money to what's going on at home with students and their families.

With regard to how trauma and stress affect children, the neuroscience field has also provided invaluable information that demonstrates both risks and solutions, which I hope to share far and wide in the education community.

Robyn Ewing (Ewing, 2010) highlights the power of Drama as a means of increasing student agency by «authentically sharing power and risk - taking» (Ewing, 2010, p. 41) between teachers and children.

Children can bring in water and fruit, but the school does not allow packed lunches in order to «reduce the risk of sharing food, which may be against an individuals» dietary requirements».

It hurts public schools, both financially and by concentrating the share of at - risk children.

In sharing our best practices with early childhood professionals, we can equip them with what's needed to better serve at - risk children and families.

Charter schools teach some of our state's most at - risk children, and we should be sure they receive their fair share of public support,» said Bill Phillips, President of the Northeast Charter Schools Network.

In addition to helping at - risk children and battered women, Deborah and Kimberly also share an «animal attraction» of sorts.

As recognised in the recent Nuffield Foundation / Universities of Warwick and Reading report How do County Courts share the care of children between parents (June 2015) there is a role for the courts, as a last resort, and there should be if the risk of serious harm is to be minimised by scrutiny of courts and other professionals.

After considering the jurisprudence with respect to the double - bind question, the Court found that the risk of it resulting in a presumptive disposition may be greater where a joint custody or shared residency arrangement requiring both parents to reside in the same locale is in the best interests of the child.

The recommendations of the Ombudsman, along with the government announcement on December 12th about 33 million new dollars to support kinship care and the governments announcement about new information sharing to ensure early identification of, and assistance to children at risk, present opportunities for grand changes in Victoria's kinship care system.

Bright Futures, the AAP health promotion initiative, provides resources for pediatricians to detect both ACEs and adverse developmental outcomes.36 Programs like Reach Out and Read, in which pediatricians distribute books and model reading, simultaneously promote emergent literacy and parent — child relationships through shared reading.37, 38 However, ACEs can not be addressed in isolation and require collaborative efforts with partners in the education, home visitation, and other social service sectors in synergistic efforts to strengthen families.29 In this way, programs like Help Me Grow39 that create streamlined access to early childhood services for at - risk children can play a critical role in building an integrated system that connects families to needed resources to enhance the development of vulnerable children.

/ School restorative conferencing / School restorative conferencing / School setting / Schools / School's contribution / Secure accommodation (1) / Secure accommodation (2) / Self / Self awareness for facilitators / Self in family work / Self - blame / Self - development / Self exposed / Self - expressions / Self formation / Self - injury (1) / Self - injury (2) / Self - injury (3) / Self - mutilation / Self - mutilation: an examination of a growing phenomenon / Self renewal / Self - supervision (1) / Self - supervision (2) / Selfishness / altruism / Separation and Loss / Separations / Service user involvement / Severe personality disorder / Sex education / Sexual abuse / Sexual abuse in an institutional setting / Sexual abuse recovery work / Shaping modifying environments / Sharing and bearing with a child / Showing that life can be enjoyable / Significant adults / Significant learning / Silence / Silent voices / Single cause / Size of residential settings / Sleep / Small group living / Small groups / Social brain (The) / Social care in Ireland / Social care — the field / Social change / Social competence (1) / Social competence (2) / Social Competencies: Affect / Social networks in restricted settings / Social Pedagogy / Social policy / Social skills training (1) / Social skills training (2) / Social skills training (3) / Social skills training (4) / Social skills training (5) / Socratic questioning / Solution - focused principles / Some unanswered questions / Space and place / Space under threat / Spaces / Spatial arrangements / Special considerations in the development process / Spiritual connection / Spiritual well - being / Spirituality / St. John Bosco / Staff and sexual orientation / Staff induction / Staff integrity / Staff meeting / Staff morale / Staff morale in children's homes / Staff retention / Staff selection / Staff support / Staff training groups in institutions / Staff turnover / Staff values and discipline / Staffing / Statement of Purpose / Status of care workers / Stealing / Steering a middle course / Stigma / Story, time, motion, place / Story unfolding / Storybook reading / Street children (1) / Street children (2) / Street children (3) / Street children (4) / Street children (5) / Street children (6) / Street children and self - determination / Street corner / Street kids / Street youth and prostitution / Streetsmart kids / Stress / Stress in child care work / Strengths (1) / Strengths (2) / Strengths (3) / Structure of activities / Structured storying / Structuring the relationship / Stuck clients / Students / Students, self and practice / Succeeding with at - risk youth / Successful careers / Suicidal behaviour in GLB youth / Suicide (1) / Suicide (2) / Suicide attempts / Suicide risk / Suitability for practice / Supervision (1) / Supervision (2) / Supervision (3) / Supervision (4) / Supervision (5) / Supervision (6) / Supervision (7) / Supervision (8) / Supervision (9) / Supervision and ethics / Supervision and practice / Supervision and teaching / Supervision formats / Supervision: Parallel process / Supervision wish list / Supervisor insecurity / Support for self - harm / Support for self - harm / Symbolic communication / Symptom tolerance guaranteed / Systemic thinking / Systems (1) / Systems (2) / Systems (3) / Systems and spheres of influence / Systems thinking / Systems vs developmental views /

Although home visiting programs differ from each other in terms of targeted population (children with disabilities, teen mothers, at - risk families), providers (professionals, paraprofessionals, volunteers), activities and schedules, they all share the same objective, which is to support children's healthy growth and development.

As research continues to side with shared parenting, federal statistics continue to reveal the risks faced by children denied the active involvement of both parents.

IS Medicare Local and the Centre subsequently forged a partnership with the shared goal of building children's resilience through enhancing relationships, reducing the risk of mental health difficulties, and supporting families in need at the Centre.

Talk to your child about the risks of sharing, identifying where they live or go to school, and what people online might do with that information.

KidsMatter connected the two services and they subsequently forged a partnership with the shared goals of building children's resilience through enhancing relationships, reducing the risk of mental health difficulties, and supporting families in need at the Centre.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — with whom the child lives — where there are allegations the father and paternal grandmother sexually abused the child — whether there is an unacceptable risk of harm to the child in the father's care — where the child has speech and language delays — where the child had spent unsupervised time with the father after separation — where the parties entered into final Consent Orders in October 2015 — where the allegations arose after that — where the child has been spending supervised time with the father since October 2016 — where the mother obtained a domestic violence protection order against the father in 2015 — where an order for equal shared parental responsibility is not in the child's best interests — where an unacceptable risk of harm is not found — where the mother is granted sole parental responsibility — where the child will continue to live primarily with the mother and spend unsupervised time with the father on an increasing basis

Share with your children, «I'm thankful for the men and women willing to risk their lives to save others in need» and / or «I'm thankful that we have these people to help us stay safe.»

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thCHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mother