Sentences with phrase «risk for higher returns»

I do not want higher risk for higher returns.

Our closest relatives almost always prefer a sure bet, according to a recent study, choosing value in hand over risk for higher returns.

However, I've already found my «enough» money to live off, so I have no interest in taking outsized risk for higher returns.

Many people keep 6 months worth of expenses saved up in savings accounts / CD's, and beyond that they'll expose a portion of their money to market risk for a higher return.

But since this isn't money that you need to live on immediately, you may be able to take more of a risk for a higher return.

By sophisticated I mean that the investor fully understands the underlying risks and accepts that you must necessarily take on higher risks for higher returns.

Returns on endowment policies are conservative but guaranteed and these are meant for risk - averse individuals — those who prefer a steady though moderate return rather than take high risks for high returns.

Not exact matches

They're not demanding the higher returns to compensate them for those risks.

When we're investing in private funds, we're looking for something that has a high enough return to pay us for the higher risk and lack of liquidity.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

For instance, for venture capital, where there is a significant risk that the technology will be worthless and the company may never develop, the expected return needs to be highFor instance, for venture capital, where there is a significant risk that the technology will be worthless and the company may never develop, the expected return needs to be highfor venture capital, where there is a significant risk that the technology will be worthless and the company may never develop, the expected return needs to be higher.

«The challenging thing for investors is we're in this environment of muted returns, but it's accompanied by the risk of higher volatility,» Cooper says.

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.

Record - low interest rates also have caused some big institutional investors to search for returns in the high - risk, high - reward world of venture capital.

«The idea is that as institutional investors seek out increasingly higher levels of risk / return, that Bitcoin may represent the most risky / potentially highest return available, and hence could be evolving quickly into a primary barometer / leading indicator for broader financial markets and risk appetite.»

«For example, a bond fund may borrow and take on leverage in order to show a higher return but has significantly higher risk than a retiree may want in an income portfolio.»

With interest rates at record lows, family and friends may be willing to take a higher risk for a higher short term return.

As a result, it is now clear that the U.S. is in the latter stages of the multi-year credit cycle, a period when rising corporate leverage negatively affects returns to corporate debt as investors demand higher risk premiums to compensate for the greater volatility created by increased leverage.

Ideally, for any given time period, you want your investment to appear in the upper - left quadrant, as this indicates you've received higher returns for a relatively low amount of risk.

If I want low risk I accept lower returns, if I'm ok with higher risk I can go for higher returns.

It demonstrates that a global equity framework can provide diversification and higher long - term risk - adjusted returns for investors from high growth countries who often hold home - biased equity portfolios that can have high concentration risk.

Higher proportion of funds focused in higher risk assets, such as shares for the potential of higher rHigher proportion of funds focused in higher risk assets, such as shares for the potential of higher rhigher risk assets, such as shares for the potential of higher rhigher returns

So, despite our rational desire to get a return for the risks we take, we tend to value something we own higher than the price we'd normally be prepared to pay for it.

these competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds, which could allow them to consider a wider range of investments and to bid more aggressively than us for investments.

But for many investors (including younger investors with relatively long time horizons), sacrificing some liquidity in exchange for mitigated risk and higher potential returns is a trade - off well worth making.

For example, if you're comfortable taking on more risk in exchange for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonFor example, if you're comfortable taking on more risk in exchange for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonfor potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonds.

I think high costs [eroding already lower returns] are as much of a risk for investors as the [economic situation] in Europe or China.

If you're searching for investments that offer both higher potential returns and higher risk, you may want to consider adding some foreign stocks to your portfolio.

First, the riskiness associated with capital investment might have gone up and so higher rates of return could be simply compensating for higher risk rather than implying attractive investments.

Generally, investments offering potential for higher returns are accompanied by a higher degree of risk.

In Chile's case they said nothing about the way this transferred risk from the private to the public sector, even though they defended high rates of return as a reward for the private sector ostensibly taking risks.

The yearly return figures illustrate the higher risk of foreign and smaller firm stocks — small - cap stocks had more yearly losses than did large - cap stocks, and the losses for both international stocks and small - company stocks can be larger than for large - cap stocks.

Jim O'Shaughnessy sees high risk for negative real returns in long bonds, calling this «a generational selling opportunity» #TBP2013 — William Sweet, CFP ® @billsweet, president at Stevens & Sweet Financial

For example, a risk index of 1.30 for a fund indicates that it is 30 % more volatile than the typical fund in its category and should therefore have a higher return than averaFor example, a risk index of 1.30 for a fund indicates that it is 30 % more volatile than the typical fund in its category and should therefore have a higher return than averafor a fund indicates that it is 30 % more volatile than the typical fund in its category and should therefore have a higher return than average.

The hope for investors is that for this fee, Fundrise will be able to cherry pick the best investments that provide the highest risk - adjusted returns since it's often hard to tell which one is best since they all sound pretty good.

Indeed, once our estimated market return / risk profile is strictly negative (as it is at present), the negative implications for the S&P 500 aren't affected by the position of the market relative to that average, except that the market tends to experience higher volatility once the market breaks that average.

NEXUS» goal is for its members to achieve higher returns with less risk than typical angel investments by utilizing a model combining the business acumen of NEXUS members with Florida's community resources — including the vast university system and regional economic development programs.

We see the overall environment as positive for risk assets, but expect more muted returns and higher volatility than in 2017.

A comeback of inflation and Fed normalization may create a challenge for investors looking for high risk - adjusted returns.»

If you value the contrarian viewpoint and want access to a high - performing portfolio targeting the best risk - adjusted returns, then Street Freak is a perfect fit for you.

As you move up the risk ladder you take on greater price volatility in exchange for potentially higher long - term returns.

For most people of moderate means, this is the lowest risk, highest return approach.

Stocks are probably the most popular asset; they are more volatile and have higher risk, but they're easy to understand and have the highest potential for return.

Unlike its successful European counterparts, demand for higher risk - adjusted returns, the existence of retrocession fees and stronger desire to retain control, continue to act as headwinds to grow fee - based assets, at a rate that outpaces private banks» robust AUM growth and regional wealth creation.

Leverage offers the potential for higher returns, but also involves increased risk.

The low interest rate environment may also have encouraged a shift in investments towards hedge funds as, in the past, hedge funds have achieved higher average returns than traditionally managed investments, albeit in exchange for greater risk.

The main issue for good, established companies here is not the risk to the long - term stream of cash flows, but to what extent the uncertainty about the coming year or two of earnings will frighten investors to sell at depressed prices (thereby pricing stocks to deliver even higher long - term returns).

, but I think it's a mistake for risk averse or diversified investors to completely give up on high quality bonds because they're worried about poor returns from low yields.

Based on this aspect, ICOs can not be considered safe investments, but rather high - risks with huge potential for high returns.

For a number of years, concerns had been expressed about the underpricing of risk in a range of financial instruments and the associated search for yield as investors sought higher returns in non-standard financial products as the yield on more standard products such as government bonds was deemed to be inadequaFor a number of years, concerns had been expressed about the underpricing of risk in a range of financial instruments and the associated search for yield as investors sought higher returns in non-standard financial products as the yield on more standard products such as government bonds was deemed to be inadequafor yield as investors sought higher returns in non-standard financial products as the yield on more standard products such as government bonds was deemed to be inadequate.