Drawing on case studies
of past environmental debates such as those over
acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful action on climate change lower - cost, then much
of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on climate change will depend heavily on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix
of options, with some actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against climate
risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.
People have responded successfully to other major environmental challenges such as
acid rain and the ozone hole with benefits greater than costs, and scientists working with economists believe there are ways to manage the
risks of climate change while balancing current and future economic prosperity.