Not exact matches
Kostin said that these correlations are «mean - reverting» and are likely to fall
given the idiosyncratic impact
of policy risks, adding that equities within the consumer discretionary and health care sectors offer the best stock - picking opportunities.
Such
risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels
of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments
of the aerospace industry, levels
of air travel, financial condition
of commercial airlines, the impact
of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition
of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization
of the anticipated benefits
of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing
of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition
of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration
of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization
of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels
of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability
of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope
of future repurchases
of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level
of other investing activities and uses
of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition
of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery
of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits
of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits
of diversification and balance
of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome
of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact
of the negotiation
of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect
of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect
of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect
of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the
risk that such approvals may result in the imposition
of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits
of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing
of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence
of events that may
give rise to a right
of one or both
of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee
of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million
of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects
of the announcement or the completion
of the merger on the market price
of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20)
risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation
of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21)
risks relating to the value
of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22)
risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23)
risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
WASHINGTON - Federal Reserve Bank
of St. Louis President James Bullard
gives presentation on the U.S. economy and monetary
policy before the National Association for Business Economics conference, «Promoting Sustained Growth: Policy Tensions and Risks» - 130
policy before the National Association for Business Economics conference, «Promoting Sustained Growth:
Policy Tensions and Risks» - 130
Policy Tensions and
Risks» - 1300 GMT.
It integrates directly with cloud providers» infrastructure, enabling customers to optimize and automate instance purchasing to take advantage
of pricing changes, allows a business user to automate all rules,
policies and governance, and
gives security professionals visibility into real - time
risks.
In my personal opinion, the emphasis upon taking out insurance against downside
risks lies in conflict with the shift to data dependency
given long and variable lags
of monetary
policy impacts on the broader economy which could have counselled front - loading insurance cuts rather than scattering them (if delivering any more at all) in which case precious little insurance has been taken out.
The speech starts by setting out three key themes
of the Bank's recent communication about Australia's transition from the resources sector boom to more normal economic conditions: that the sheer scale
of the boom means that this transition is challenging, and that the broader global environment compounds the challenge; that a reasonably successful transition is possible
given our economy's positive fundamentals and flexibility; and that monetary
policy is doing what it can to help the transition, but that the chances
of success would be boosted by a lift in productivity growth and an increase in the expected
risk - adjusted rate
of return on investment.
The limitations
of macroprudential
policies reflect the potential for
risks to emerge outside sectors subject to regulation, the potential for supervision and regulation to miss emerging
risks, the uncertain efficacy
of new macroprudential tools such as a countercyclical capital buffer, and the potential for such
policy steps to be delayed or to lack public support.14
Given such limitations, adjustments in monetary
policy may, at times, be needed to curb
risks to financial stability.15
Mostly likely, the Bank
of England's Monetary
Policy Committee (MPC) will have an easing bias,
given the
risk of lowflation from weak growth.
The USD is banging on big resistance levels ahead
of an FOMC that includes only the release
of a
policy statement and fairly low expectations, ironically meaning that surprise
risk may be underappreciated, especially
given conflicting extremes in speculative US dollar short and US interest rate shorts.
So based on your argument, Professor King, it is no coincidence that some
of the strongest arguments about the potential damage
of this Coles pricing
policy have been made by other milk processors,
given that you outline that milk processors are probably the ones at the greatest
risk here
of losing profit margin?
Since the early 1990s, government
policy on maternity care in England has moved towards
policies designed to
give women with straightforward pregnancies a choice
of settings for birth.1 2 In this context, freestanding midwifery units, midwifery units located in the same building or on the same site as an obstetric unit (hereafter referred to as alongside midwifery units), and home birth services have increasingly become relevant to the configuration
of maternity services under consideration in England.3 The relative benefits and
risks of birth in these alternative settings have been widely debated in recent years.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lower rates
of obstetric interventions and other positive maternal outcomes have been consistently found in planned births at home and in midwifery units, but clear conclusions regarding perinatal outcome have been lacking.
Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based
Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives
of at -
risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was
given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were
given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were
given a low rating.
The American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists previously released a
policy statement that also said hospitals and birthing facilities are the safest places to
give birth, but it respects the right
of a woman to make a medically - informed decision about delivery after hearing the
risks and benefits.
Of course, there are other necessary elements including an innovation strategy,
policies to boost human capital
giving employees a stake and voice in the firm as well as upgrading skills, more investment in science and R&D, and more
risk capital for firms in export - led sectors.
Actually there are other kinds
of foreign
policy risks they may be managing, and that they are
given strategic powers to deal with — economic
risk, threats to our national economy which in practise may mean something more akin to industrial espionage, as certainly seems to be the case in the USA.
In the context
of systemic
risk due to banking panics, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the political effect
of giving bankers an overpowering incentive to influence the Federal Reserve System's Federal Open Market Committee and the Federal Reserve Board
of Governors to implement system wide
policies for extension
of credit which socialize and cartelize the banking sector to work towards its own common purpose.
Given the reality
of the underlying structure
of this economic recovery,
risks remain around global oil markets; security and political reconciliation in the Niger - Delta;
policy; and
of course the political transition.
In July, in an update
of a 1998
policy statement, the American Academy
of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended dropping the age at which at -
risk children should be
given statins — a class
of cholesterol - lowering medication — from 10 years old to 8 years.
Also I remember an American climate researcher [Schlesinger I think] was going around
giving a presentation on reducing CO2 [and spending money to do so] as a form
of Insurance
policy against the
risk of climate change.
The new Prime Minister is still in the early stages
of her premiership and will likely not wish to
risk losing a vote on a major
policy such as this, especially
given the pressures
of the negotiating leaving the European Union and triggering Article 50 looming over her head.
The departments, citing the Civil Rights Act
of 1964,
gave the school districts «guidance on how to identify, avoid, and remedy discriminatory discipline,» telling them they
risked legal action if school disciplinary
policies had «a disparate impact, i.e., a disproportionate and unjustified effect on students
of a particular race.»
Just as the publication
of A Nation at
Risk caused President Reagan to re-evaluate his education
policies, the 25th anniversary
of the landmark report should
give federal policymakers the opportunity to reconsider the current federal approach, one influential lawmaker said last week.
For this reason, as the Common Core, and its fewer, higher, clearer standards, moves forward into implementation, states must
give adequate attention to their accountability
policies and the potential consequences
of these
policies on those students most at -
risk of dropping out.
However,
given the apparently escalating
risk of the government intending to pursue enforcement action against lenders and dealers, it makes sense to develop and implement a one - price
policy on dealer reserve.
Discounts can't be
given unless they're meaningful to the
risk of the
policy.
All
of these factors will be considered when
giving you a business insurance quote in order to tailor the
policy to your needs and
risks.
Voting against the action were Richard W. Fisher, who believed that, while the Committee should be patient in beginning to normalize monetary
policy, improvement in the U.S. economic performance since October has moved forward, further than the majority
of the Committee envisions, the date when it will likely be appropriate to increase the federal funds rate; Narayana Kocherlakota, who believed that the Committee's decision, in the context
of ongoing low inflation and falling market - based measures
of longer - term inflation expectations, created undue downside
risk to the credibility
of the 2 percent inflation target; and Charles I. Plosser, who believed that the statement should not stress the importance
of the passage
of time as a key element
of its forward guidance and,
given the improvement in economic conditions, should not emphasize the consistency
of the current forward guidance with previous statements.
Once they're filed, those are the rates which an insurance company is allowed to charge for a particular set
of risks that make up a
given policy.
Policies often offer a floor, to prevent market losses
of greater than zero AND may cap gains at a certain rate depending upon the
risk of the
given index.
Given that the floater
policy you'll need to protect your fine art snowman covers open perils, you still need to mitigate the
risk of heat destroying your snowman.
In just a few minutes, your renters insurance expert can help you to determine your needs, your exposures, and your
risk profile and create the ideal
policy that
gives you the right amount
of protection at the right price.
Poloz then admitted that the BOC has not included «the
risk of a significant shift toward more - protectionist trade
policies in the United States,
given the range
of potential outcomes and the uncertainty about timing.»
the
risk of a significant shift toward more - protectionist trade
policies in the United States,
given the range
of potential outcomes and the uncertainty about timing
Now, as a note to
risk managers, it is probably a bad idea to
give control
of hedging
policy over to the line
of business actuary, even though it worked out for the pension division
of Provident Mutual.
Given the evidence from Jensen, Johnson and Mercer (2000, 2002) that the return and
risk of commodity futures appear to be related to the Federal Reserve's manipulation
of policy rates, we extended the investigation by examining a tactical allocation scheme linked to changes in
policy rates.
It's no surprise,
given the American Bird Conservancy's contribution (president George Fenwick is among the paper's seven co-authors, and Steve Holmer, Bird Conservation Alliance director, is thanked in the acknowledgments for his «review and input during the writing
of the manuscript») that the article provides no evidence whatsoever
of such
policies and practices reducing the
risk of rabies posed by free - roaming cats.
World Nomads offers insurance
policies to travelers around the world, but relies on different underwriters — affiliated companies that assess
risk and decide whether to provide insurance and under what terms — depending on a
given client traveler's country
of residence.
This Marriott
policy has allowed me to lock up the reward nights so I'm not at any
risk of losing the rooms we need and also
given me plenty
of time to make up the points to complete the reservation.
Also I remember an American climate researcher [Schlesinger I think] was going around
giving a presentation on reducing CO2 [and spending money to do so] as a form
of Insurance
policy against the
risk of climate change.
Given the human tendency to favor current needs over future
risks, some environmental and legal scholars are proposing that governments at various levels appoint a «legal guardian
of future generations» to consider the impact
of policy choices on citizens yet unborn.
In quieter corners, including at environmental groups focused on energy and climate
policy as well as land preservation, the goal has never been a ban, but instead a push to create the set
of rules,
policies, revenue flows and relationships that
give the greatest social and economic benefits with the least
risk of environmental regrets.
It is the sort
of spin the government
gives for implementing
policies based on their ideological beliefs but without proper cost benefit analysis or properly
risk analysis.
Some degree
of fear is rather normal
given the way humans approach
risk, particularly with something like the
risks from radiation, and particularly
given inherent trust that comes from for - profit overlay onto the «common good» and (IMO) laying that fear exclusively at the feet
of environmentalists, or simply labeling it as irrational, is more a product
of ideologically - driven identity - protective cognition and tribalism on the part
of nuclear proponents than a useful ingredient for making progress on energy
policy development.
A deep cut would be both dangerous and unjustified,
given the basics
of both climate science and economics, said Gernot Wagner, a Harvard economist focused on climate
risk and
policy.
But in this case,
given the
risk - management challenges we face and the
policy alternatives under consideration, it is our judgment that a carbon tax is a preferred course
of public
policy action versus cap and trade approaches.»
January 2012 Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy
Given the increasingly important role the Heartland Institute is playing in leading the fight to prevent the implementation
of dangerous
policy actions to address the supposed
risks of global warming, it is useful to set priorities for our efforts in 2012.
Talking
of which, we are flattered that Bob Ward —
Policy and Communications Director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, erstwhile Director
of Public
Policy at
risk insurance giants RMS and before that, Senior Manager for
Policy Communication at the Royal Society — has dropped by to
give his thoughts on our observation that, if you're going to go around accusing the opposition
of corruption, you'd better be whiter than white yourself.
It is worth noting that Peter Terium, the 50 - year old Dutchman who has been CEO
of the German energy giant since July 2012, was among one
of ten CEO's
of European energy companies who on 11 October
gave a joint press conference in Brussels in which they warned that the EU's energy and climate
policy is having a disastrous effect on the power production sector, even leading to the
risk of major blackouts.
-- Pharmaceutical Company v. Insurers: Confidential arbitration proceedings relating to liability insurance and its application to US pharmaceutical
risks (
policy governed by New York Law)
giving rise to issues as to the scope
of cover / exclusion clauses.
It was the first piece
of legislation that actually compelled employers to perform
risk assessments
of potential violence in the workplace (all violence, not just sexual violence), institute programs and
policies for workplace violence and harassment (all harassment, not just sexual),
give training to employees with respect to both violence and harassment, and — most importantly — develop specific procedures to enable both the reporting and investigation
of employee complaints
of harassment.