Sentences with phrase «risk of death because»

Employees who have worked for the same employer part time or full time for 1 uninterrupted year may be eligible to take up to 8 weeks of compassionate care leave in order to care for a family member who is at risk of death because of illness (s. 53.9 (2), Employment Standards Code).

Puppies are at greatest risk of death because of their limited body reserves.

After the rescue, the dogs were examined by a veterinarian, who found that eight were pregnant, including some at high risk of death because of their age.

Not exact matches

One reason workers are willing to take on risky jobs is because they are paid a compensating wage differential when the risk of death is high.

«He should be brought back from Russia and given due process and I think the proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence for having put friends of mine, friends of yours, who serve in the military today at enormous risk because of the information he stole and then released to foreign powers,» Pompeo said on C - SPAN on Feb. 11.

We know it was him because without absolute proof, we would not have declared his death and run the risk of having him reappear alive and well.

Now if i choose to have an abortion because I know I have a high risk of death due to childbirth, that is still murder, but I would then adopt out of response of this desicion.

It alone reserves nothing for itself and thus can dispose also of the future (which otherwise man seeks to save, because he is fearful of his finiteness, which must be treated with care); it alone can love even this earth together with God and thus integrate also all earthly love into the moment of eternity, and it alone will not fail in this, because it loves him who has never been sorry for having risked this earth of guilt, curse, death and vanity.

They are also worried about the «high risk of infection... that may lead to death» because the procedure is usually done in homes that have not been sterilised.

But it is a risk you must take against Alabama because, in the end, the downside of doing it (quick death) is no different than the downside of not doing it (fast death).

Because pacifiers are associated with a lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), experts now recommend letting babies go to sleep with a pacifier.

This woman had the courage to accept that her decision to refuse induction resulted in the death of her baby, and she made a point of countering the «babies know when to be born / some babies just bake longer / babies aren't library books» with «My son died because he was postdates and I didn't understand the risks.»

That's because breast milk — custom - made nourishment specially formulated by Mother Nature — offers so many benefits: It boosts your baby's immune system, promotes brain development, and may reduce your child's risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) as well as diabetes, some types of cancer, obesity, high cholesterol, and asthma later in life.

Resist the temptation to line his crib with soft pillows, blankets, or bumpers because these can pose a suffocation hazard and raise the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in babies less than 1 year old.

We've heard of some recent stories where some of the formulas were pulled off the shelves, because of contaminations, and then babies that are receiving formula have a higher risk of middle ear infection, eczema, gastrointestinal infections, lower respiratory track diseases, asthma, the risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, also childhood leukemia and sudden infant death syndrome.

When this twin passes away, the other twin is at risk for death or birth defects because of the connecting vessels.

That because too much bedding, or the wrong kind of bedding, can cause accidental suffocation and overheating, which are believed to be a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS.

C - section is the life saving treatment for a worrisome velamentous cord insertion because it reduces the risk of perinatal death to near zero, not homebirth, which guarantees the baby's death if the blood vessel is torn.

Yet another baby has been placed at risk of significant brain damage and possible death because the clueless homebirth midwives didn't understand how to diagnose fetal distress.

This position has become standard practice because back - sleeping decreases the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).

Baby cribs and baby bedding safety have received a lot of press in recent years because of the risks of sudden baby death syndrome associated with certain types of baby mattresses, among other things.

Homebirth increases the risk of neonatal death because homebirth has resurrected third world causes of death in the first world.

Because they still have poor head control and often experience flexion of the head while in a sitting position, infants younger than 1 month in sitting devices might be at increased risk of upper airway obstruction and oxygen desaturation.128, — , 132 In addition, there is increasing concern about injuries from falls resulting from car seats being placed on elevated surfaces.133, — , 137 An analysis of CPSC data revealed 15 suffocation deaths between 1990 and 1997 resulting from car seats overturning after being placed on a bed, mattress, or couch.136 The CPSC also warns about the suffocation hazard to infants, particularly those who are younger than 4 months, who are carried in infant sling carriers.138 When infant slings are used for carrying, it is important to ensure that the infant's head is up and above the fabric, the face is visible, and that the nose and mouth are clear of obstructions.

Because they can detect subtle signs of cognitive impairment indicating that an athlete's brain has not fully healed, even where the athlete claims his symptoms have cleared, the tests are designed to help to protect young athletes against the risk of suffering a second concussion by returning too soon, which can lead to short - and long - term cognitive problems, and catastrophic injury or even death from second impact syndrome.

While I have been a little torn in the past about agreeing with the recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics for a «ban on the manufacture and sale of mobile infant walkers,» I do now agree «because data indicate a considerable risk of major and minor injury and even death from the use of walkers, and because there is no clear benefit from their use.»

Although it appears that the preventable newborn deaths at home and hospital birth balance out, homebirth is clearly safer when you take into consideration the risk of maternal death that 20 % of low risk U.S. women face as a result of avoidable cesareans which became necessary because they went to hospital.

In this way there is reduced the risk of the infant death syndrome called cot death or SIDS that can happen because of the accidental suffocation when parents...

Because it can increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), a condition that causes a newborn to unexpectedly pass away.

Medical authorities and coroners are not usually forthcoming about the details associated with bedsharing deaths, like if the infant was sleeping prone in the bed, an independent risk factor for SIDS, for example, Indeed, one former President of First Candle once called parents who bedshared guilty of «uneducated parenting» and suggested that parents bedshare because they think it is «cool».

For a third point, why don't you actually lay - out the risks of infant death that the data shows result from bed - sharing... rather than exhort folk to do so because it is «natural»?

One of the studies in the 2005 meta - analysis, conducted with high - risk women delivering at a hospital in India, was stopped early because of 4 fetal deaths: 3 in the nipple stimulation group, and 1 in the oxytocin induction group.

Excluding type 2 diabetes (because of insufficient data), we conducted a cost analysis for all pediatric diseases for which the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reported risk ratios that favored breastfeeding: necrotizing enterocolitis, otitis media, gastroenteritis, hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infections, atopic dermatitis, sudden infant death syndrome, childhood asthma, childhood leukemia, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and childhood obesity.

The article is really a long - winded way to say that homebirth should not be banned, but rather severely discouraged because of the potential long - term effects and, what they conclude, as higher risk of death for infant and mother.

Attempting a home birth also is not advised for women who are post-term (greater than 42 weeks gestation), carrying twins, or have a breech presentation because all carry a greater risk of perinatal death.

For instance, according to the Mayo Clinic, babies who co-sleep are at risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) because the soft surfaces may impair breathing.

Enabling women to breastfeed is also a public health priority because, on a population level, interruption of lactation is associated with adverse health outcomes for the woman and her child, including higher maternal risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease, and greater infant risks of infectious disease, sudden infant death syndrome, and metabolic disease (2, 4).

As almost all of the USA premature babies (first cause of neonatal death) are born at a hospital since they are high risk, you should take them out of the Comparison because they are not being born at home.

For example, Janssen was forced to publicly retract the claims in the 2002 paper because it actually showed that homebirth increased the risk of death.

No, I don't believe that there is a 3 - 4 fold risk of perinatal death at home birth because as I said in my comment, we don't have the intrapartum data from hospitals in order to even make an apples to apples comparison.

I made a quick search for «maternal death rate increase» Everything I found points to the same thing: Maternal death rate increased in the USA because of the increasing rates of obesity, diabetes and hypertension and other kind of risk factors (Which raises the risk of pregnancy).

In contrast, co-sleeping — another practice vigorously supported by Brown — is killing many more each year because, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, it nearly triples the risk of infant death from SIDS.

The supine sleep position does not increase the risk of choking and aspiration in infants, even those with gastroesophageal reflux, because they have protective airway mechanisms.8, 9 Infants with gastroesophageal reflux should be placed for sleep in the supine position for every sleep, with the rare exception of infants for whom the risk of death from complications of gastroesophageal reflux is greater than the risk of SIDS (ie, those with upper airway disorders, for whom airway protective mechanisms are impaired), 10 including infants with anatomic abnormalities such as type 3 or 4 laryngeal clefts who have not undergone antireflux surgery.

Subsequently, by virtue of defining that an adult and infant are unable to safely sleep on the same surface together, such as what occurs during bedsharing, even when all known adverse bedsharing risk factors are absent and safe bedsharing practices involving breastfeeding mothers are followed, an infant that dies while sharing a sleeping surface with his / her mother is labeled a SUID, and not SIDS.26 In this way the infant death statistics increasingly supplement the idea that bedsharing is inherently and always hazardous and lend credence, artificially, to the belief that under no circumstance can a mother, breastfeeding or not, safely care for, or protect her infant if asleep together in a bed.27 The legitimacy of such a sweeping inference is highly problematic, we argue, in light of the fact that when careful and complete examination of death scenes, the results revealed that 99 % of bedsharing deaths could be explained by the presence of at least one and usually multiple independent risk factors for SIDS such as maternal smoking, prone infant sleep, use of alcohol and / or drugs by the bedsharing adults.28 Moreover, this new ideology is especially troubling because it leads to condemnations of bedsharing parents that border on charges of being neglectful and / or abusive.

A recent meta - analysis of 11 studies that investigated the association of bed - sharing and SIDS revealed a summary OR of 2.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.99 — 4.18) with bed - sharing.158 Furthermore, bed - sharing in an adult bed not designed for infant safety exposes the infant to additional risks for accidental injury and death, such as suffocation, asphyxia, entrapment, falls, and strangulation.159, 160 Infants, particularly those in the first 3 months of life and those born prematurely and / or with low birth weight, are at highest risk, 161 possibly because immature motor skills and muscle strength make it difficult to escape potential threats.158 In recent years, the concern among public health officials about bed - sharing has increased, because there have been increased reports of SUIDs occurring in high - risk sleep environments, particularly bed - sharing and / or sleeping on a couch or armchair.162, — , 165

If you look at the black - box warning on a packet of birth control pills, you'll notice that at most ages the risk of death from taking the pills is less than if you don't take them — that's because they're so good at preventing pregnancy, and pregnancy kills.

Actuarial considerations aren't really relevant in the big picture, because all prudent banks attempt to guard their capital accounts by diversification of credit risk and, if necessary, true insurance for things like death of the debtor.

People with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of cardiovascular - related events, such as heart attacks, stroke, and even death, often because their levels of triglycerides are so high, and their high - density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels are low.

Because of increased prosperity and better medical care, the risk of death for children younger than 5 is projected to decrease by more than 40 percent by 2030.

Dr Hashimoto said: «Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death because they often have latent ischaemic heart disease which reduces blood flow to the heart.

However, scientists suspect these studies do not reflect the true effect of BMI on health, because early stages of illness, health - damaging behaviours, such as cigarette smoking, and other factors can lead to both lower BMI and increased risk of death.