Sentences with phrase «risk of death compared»

Nursing home residents who have been abused have a 300 percent higher risk of death compared to those who have not been mistreated.

The study found that people consuming low - carbohydrate, animal - based protein diets had a higher risk of death compared to people eating a low - carb diet with plant or vegetable - based proteins, says CNN.

These major studies found vegetarians to be at lower risk of death compared to non-vegetarians.

For example, an analysis of nearly 24,000 patients with type 2 diabetes found that three diabetes drugs — glipizide, glyburide, and glimepiride — caused a more than 50 percent greater risk of death compared to another diabetes drug, Metformin.v The three drugs are known as sulfonylureas, which work by spurring your body to produce more insulin.

One study showed that three hours or more per week of vigorous activity was associated with 61 % lower risk of death compared to men who exercised less than one hour per week.

Obese people with central obesity were also at higher risk of death compared to normal - weight and normal - waist individuals.

While advantages in PFS and OS emerged in an overall meta - analysis of the entire group, the survival benefit associated with obesity was restricted to men treated with targeted or immunotherapies, where obese men had a 47 percent decreased risk of death compared to men with normal BMI.

Mexican - Americans have increased stroke risk, but lower risk of death compared to non-Hispanic whites.

Between 19 and 34 percent of patients with diabetes develop chronic foot ulcers, the presence of which significantly increases their risk of death compared with patients without foot ulcers.

Women with a history of infertility have a 10 percent increased risk of death compared to those without reported infertility struggles, according to results of a new study from researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Babies who were breastfed had only 12 % risk of death compared to with those who were not breastfed.

Not exact matches

People who felt like their lives had meaning had a 15 % lower risk of death in a 14 year period, compared to those who said they felt aimless.

In a late - stage trial, Darzalex combined with Velcade and chemotherapy slashed patients» risk of worsening disease or death by a stunning 61 % compared with the results for Velcade and chemotherapy alone.

Study after study comparing battery cage operations with cage - free operations shows a higher risk with battery cages of salmonella infections, the leading cause of food poisoning related death in the United States.

The methodological challenges of attempting to compare the safety of home and hospital birth in terms of the risk of perinatal death.

Specifically, they should be informed that although the absolute risk may be low, planned home birth is associated with a twofold to threefold increased risk of neonatal death when compared with planned hospital birth» (ACOG, 2011).

Infants of pregnant women at low risk had a significantly higher risk of delivery related perinatal death (relative risk 2.33, 1.12 to 4.83), compared with infants of women at high risk whose labour started in secondary care under the supervision of an obstetrician.

Women run 5 to 7 times the risk of death with cesarean section compared with vaginal birth.14, 29 Complications during and after the surgery include surgical injury to the bladder, uterus and blood vessels (2 per 100), 30 hemorrhage (1 to 6 women per 100 require a blood transfusion), 30 anesthesia accidents, blood clots in the legs (6 to 20 per 1000), 30 pulmonary embolism (1 to 2 per 1000), 30 paralyzed bowel (10 to 20 per 100 mild cases, 1 in 100 severe), 30 and infection (up to 50 times morecommon).1 One in ten women report difficulties with normal activities two months after the birth, 23 and one in four report pain at the incision site as a major problem.9 One in fourteen still report incisional pain six months or more after delivery.9 Twice as many women require rehospitalization as women having normal vaginal birth.18 Especially with unplanned cesarean section, women are more likely to experience negative emotions, including lower self - esteem, a sense of failure, loss of control, and disappointment.

Intrapartum and neonatal death at 0 — 7 days was observed in 0.15 % of planned home compared with 0.18 % in planned hospital births (crude relative risk 0.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.71 — 0.91).

The second sentence in the abstract does state: «Analysis of combined data from all 8 studies showed a three-fold increase in risk of neonatal deaths for homebirth attended by midwives, compared to hospital births.»

Intrapartum and neonatal death rates were compared with those in other North American studies of at least 500 births that were either planned out of hospital or comparable studies of low risk hospital births.

And I agree with you, that it would be completely inappropriate to say that homebirth has lower risk of death if the rate is say, 1 / 100 deaths, but 1/40, 000 in a hospital (obviously those are fictitious numbers used for illustration purposes)... but then you also have to account for the rate among individual OB's if you want a more accurate comparison, since there are multiple OBs typically in a hospital, being compared to only one midwife.

When this 20 % risk of death is compared to the 0.02 % rate of cord prolapse during labor at homebirth that might have a better outcome if it happened in hospital, this means that a low risk woman has a 1000 times higher chance of having a life threatening complication either to her life or her fetus / newborns life at planned hospital birth, than if she plans to have an attended homebirth with a well - trained practitioner.

And so, a recent German Study of about over 300 infants who had died from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, they were compared with 1000 age - matched controls and found that breastfeeding reduced the risk of SIDS by 50 percent.

However, opponents feel that these benefits are negligible compared with the risk of sleep related deaths of infants caused by suffocation and / or strangulation.

A study in 2013 involving 106 participating centers in 25 countries came to the conclusion that, in a twin pregnancy of a gestational age between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days, and the first twin is in cephalic presentation, planned Cesarean section does not significantly decrease or increase the risk of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal disability, as compared with planned vaginal delivery.

A 2001 study in Kenya comparing breastfeeding with artifical feeding reported that HIV - positive mothers who breastfed were at greater risk of death than those who used infant formula.

«Health outcomes differ substantially for mothers and infants who formula feed compared to those that breastfeed... For infants, not being breastfed [and being formula fed instead,] is associated with an increased incidence of infectious morbidity, including otitis media [ear infections], gastroenteritis, and pneumonia, as well as elevated risks of childhood obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, leukemia and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).»

➡ Compared to usual care, providing additional social support during an at - risk pregnancy probably has little or no effect on the incidence of low birth weight, preterm births, or perinatal deaths.

According to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, while home birth is associated with fewer maternal interventions compared to a planned hospital birth (such as labor induction and c - sections), it holds more than twice the risk for perinatal death — or death within the first week of life.

Without having looked into it, I am just wondering how the death rate of ONLY the higher risk women compares to similar risks at the hospital.

So it makes no sense whatsoever to try and compare the two groups as you are attempting to, since you have no way of knowing whether the difference in death rate is due to the place of birth or due to the underlying conditions which make the women in question high risk.

What I seem to gather is this: 1) The absolute risk of death from home birth is LOW, which is why homebirth advocates say that this study proves homebirth is «safe», however: 2) Compared to HOSPITAL births, the rate of death for homebirth is MUCH higher, and 3) The midwives reporting did so on a voluntary basis, so this isn't a study that is worth very much anyway.

All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low - risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to high - risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low - risk healthy white women), the infant death rate is actually 6.14 per 1000, which is «300 % higher death rate than at - home births!»

The relative risk of perinatal death comparing midwife - attended births at home with physician - attended, planned hospital births was 2.5 (95 % confidence intervals 0.27 — 24.5).

Compared with intermittent auscultation, continuous cardiotocography showed no significant improvement in overall perinatal death rate (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.23, n = 33,513, 11 trials), but was associated with a halving of neonatal seizures (RR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.31 to 0.80, n = 32,386, nine trials).

These data report intrapartum and early neonatal death rates in full term women who intended to deliver out of hospital (and subsequently deliver either out of hospital or in hospital) at the start of labor compared with women who intended a hospital birth (thus «higher risk» pregnancies are included in this group) in 2012.

When we compare the death rate at homebirth of 2.06 / 1000 with the CDC death rate for low risk white women, ages 20 - 44, at term, with babies that are not growth restricted of 0.38, we find that homebirth has a death rate 5.5 X higher than hospital birth.

Comparing intended home and hospital births in a cohort of 529688 low risk pregnancies in primary care in the Netherlands, de Jonge et al recently found low rates of perinatal mortality (intrapartum and neonatal death before 7 days) and admission to the NICU.11 They concluded that an intended home birth does not increase risks compared with an intended hospital birth in this population.

Maybe I'm wrong looking at the increased neonatal death rate in MANA's study, the increased risk of HIE in January 2014 ACOG, the increased risk of Apgars of 0 at 5 minutes (Grunebaum 2014) at homebirth as compared to hospital birth.

I'm looking at birth statistics in Canada (rough, rough numbers)-- and it looks like the risk of having a stillbirth (never mind early neonatal death or those who transferred to hospital and had a subsequent still birth)-- is nearly double with home birth (81/6247 =.01296) compared to hospital birth (2734 / 380454).

Maternal mortality is increasingly high, Nigeria has one of the poorest maternal and child health indices in the world with maternal 800-3000 deaths per 100,000 live births, life time risk of dying from pregnancy related complications of 1:8 compared to 1:10 in developing countries (Nigeria Demographic Health Survey 2004).

«We can see that those with the highest intake of fruit and vegetables have a 15 % lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and a 20 % lower risk of early death compared with those who very rarely eat fruit and vegetables.

Using data from a randomized trial of 206 men treated with either radiation or, radiation and six months of hormonal therapy, researchers compared early markers of prostate cancer death to identify men at risk of dying early.

In the new study, patients receiving angioplasty with the new stents had a 47 percent higher risk of one of the outcomes identified as a primary endpoint in the study: death, heart attack and subsequent procedure to clear blocked arteries, as compared to patients who received bypass.

Compared to population - based peers, youth who have gone to an emergency department to hospital with suicide - related behaviors had three to four times higher risk of death.

Over a median follow - up of nearly eight years, patients who were current smokers had a 40 % increased risk of cancer relapse, as well as more than 2 - times increased risks of cancer spread and cancer - related death, compared with patients who were never smokers.

Furthermore, the levels of Runx2 expression among a larger group of 351 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients were significantly higher in patients who had a high risk of early disease - related death, as compared with lower - risk patients.

Women using hormone replacement therapy to relieve the symptoms of menopause faced a lower risk of death and showed lower levels of atherosclerosis, or plaque buildup in the heart's arteries, compared to women not using hormone therapy, according to a single - center study scheduled for presentation at the American College of Cardiology's 66th Annual Scientific Session.

Compared with inactive adults, those who got the recommended amount of weekly exercise, or even substantially less, had about a one - third lower risk of death during the study period, researchers report online January 9 in JAMA Internal Medicine.