Sentences with phrase «risk of death when»

OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science Q Do deliberate self - harm patients have a greater risk of death when compared with the general population?

A pedestrian faces a 10 percent risk of death when hit by a vehicle that is traveling at just 23 mph, a 25 percent risk at a speed of 32 mph, a 50 percent risk of death at 42 mph, a 75 percent risk at 50 mph and a 90 percent risk when a vehicle strikes at 58 mph.

Younger animals with less developed immune systems are at a much higher risk of death when contracting leptospirosis.

Skinny thighs in the past were a serious liability, serving only to increase the risk of death when food supplies became scarce.

Government researchers halted part of a 2008 study when patients with type 2 diabetes and a high risk of heart attack and stroke were found to have a higher risk of death when they tried to achieve a hemoglobin A1C of less than 6 % compared with those who aimed for less than 8 %.

«Opioids increase risk of death when compared to other pain treatments.»

Long - acting opioids are associated with a significantly increased risk of death when compared with alternative medications for moderate - to - severe chronic pain, according to a Vanderbilt study released today in JAMA.

The analysis found that statins were more likely to reduce the risk of death when LDL cholesterol levels were 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg / dl) or greater, whether or not they were used with other LDL - lowering drugs.

After more than a decade (ending in 2011) of working with the Alaska Division of Public Health tracking local SIDS and sleep - related death cases, we were unable to find evidence that co-sleeping increased the risk of death when controlling for other factors.

Not exact matches

One reason workers are willing to take on risky jobs is because they are paid a compensating wage differential when the risk of death is high.

One 20 - year study of workplace environments found that those cultures that lacked supportive relationships increased the risk of mortality by 240 percent, which makes sense when you consider that chronic stress is a leading contributor to premature death.

It is deeply unjust to use religion to legitimate your own authority, an authority which extends to commanding others to kill or risk death, and then, when it suits you, limit appeals to that source of authority from which you sought recognition and blessing.

(As anyone who has been visiting MomsTEAM's Concussion Safety Center for the past twelve years knows, science and technology have yet to come up with a way to prevent concussions; the most we can realistically hope to do at this point is a better job of identifying concussions when they occur and managing them in such a way as to keep the recovery time to a minimum and to keep kids from returning before their brains have fully healed so as to minimize the risk of serious, long - term effects, or even, in rare cases, death).

When we have another baby — my risk of DEATH on the operating table is increased again if I chose a c - section.

When considering not just death but also morbidity, much morbidity is caused by hospital induction of low risk women.

Especially when you consider that pretty much every one of the co-sleeping deaths is easily attributable to parents» intoxication or other known risk factors, co-sleeping comes in as statistically pretty darned safe.

Specifically, they should be informed that although the absolute risk may be low, planned home birth is associated with a twofold to threefold increased risk of neonatal death when compared with planned hospital birth» (ACOG, 2011).

This woman had the courage to accept that her decision to refuse induction resulted in the death of her baby, and she made a point of countering the «babies know when to be born / some babies just bake longer / babies aren't library books» with «My son died because he was postdates and I didn't understand the risks.»

Homebirth increases the risk of perinatal death and brain damage even when, at the start of labor, breech, twins, VBAC.

When I finally had a chance to speak, we were already running over the 2 1/2 hours allotted for the roundtable, so I was only able to briefly touch on two of my many message points: one, that the game can be and is being made safer, and two, that, based on my experience following a high school football team in Oklahoma this past season - which will be the subject of a MomsTEAM documentary to be released in early 2013 called The Smartest Team - I saw the use of hit sensors in football helmets as offering an exciting technological «end around» the problem of chronic under - reporting of concussions that continues to plague the sport and remains a major impediment, in my view, to keeping kids safe (the reasons: if an athlete is allowed to keep playing with a concussion, studies show that their recovery is likely to take longer, and they are at increased risk of long - term problems (e.g. early dementia, depression, more rapid aging of the brain, and in rare cases, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and in extremely rare instances, catastrophic injury or death.)

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - When it comes to the potential risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome from a mother sharing her bed with her baby, there is a push to change the message from «just don't do it» to «here is how it's done most safely...» (Read More)

When infants are not optimally breastfed they are at risk for increased illness such as higher rates of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections, allergies, cancer, obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes and even death.

A baby's risk of death from being placed in an unsafe sleeping position or location is higher when they're under the care of a baby sitter, relative or friend, a new study found.

When a baby is in the beginning stages of life, it's important to keep him or her from becoming overheated or overly chilled to avoid an increased risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

But when you're searching the web for answers about sleep safety - you need to know what the SAFEST sleep options are - those which decrease your baby's risks of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID).

You would want to be cautious to avoid risks to of SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) when keeping your young one asleep.

This risk is overlooked when considering safe outcomes for birth based on birth site, which is an incredible oversight considering the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services» has recently concluded that 9.5 % of all deaths each year in the U.S. stems from a medical error.

When this twin passes away, the other twin is at risk for death or birth defects because of the connecting vessels.

When will we see Ina May Gaskin acknowledge that homebirth increases the risk of perinatal death?

However, the American Academy of Pediatrics revised its safe sleep recommendations in October 2016, which clearly outline instances that have been shown to increase the risk of SIDS, unintentional death, or injury when sharing a bed with an infant or small child.

How can you tout the safety of homebirth when the statistics from your own state show that homebirth increases the risk of neonatal death?

How can you trust that homebirth is safe when the most comprehensive study ever done of homebirth (and analyzed by a midwife) found that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED midwife has a death rate approximately 800 % higher than comparable risk hospital birth, and even MANA can't figure out how to criticize it?

18 deaths in 3 years, that's 6 per year and based on the fact that homebirth rates have been rising in the past 3 years and nearly 30 % of women are opting for homebirth I'd say those stats are pretty good and far better than your risks when walking through the doors of any hospital.

When midwives are obliged to provide prospective homebirth parents with informed consent and to tell them that their choice increases the risk of death and / or disability to their child.

Because they still have poor head control and often experience flexion of the head while in a sitting position, infants younger than 1 month in sitting devices might be at increased risk of upper airway obstruction and oxygen desaturation.128, — , 132 In addition, there is increasing concern about injuries from falls resulting from car seats being placed on elevated surfaces.133, — , 137 An analysis of CPSC data revealed 15 suffocation deaths between 1990 and 1997 resulting from car seats overturning after being placed on a bed, mattress, or couch.136 The CPSC also warns about the suffocation hazard to infants, particularly those who are younger than 4 months, who are carried in infant sling carriers.138 When infant slings are used for carrying, it is important to ensure that the infant's head is up and above the fabric, the face is visible, and that the nose and mouth are clear of obstructions.

Although it appears that the preventable newborn deaths at home and hospital birth balance out, homebirth is clearly safer when you take into consideration the risk of maternal death that 20 % of low risk U.S. women face as a result of avoidable cesareans which became necessary because they went to hospital.

High risk births such as premature, breech and twins ARE at high risk of perinatal death and overall have superior outcomes when delivered in hospital.

When this 20 % risk of death is compared to the 0.02 % rate of cord prolapse during labor at homebirth that might have a better outcome if it happened in hospital, this means that a low risk woman has a 1000 times higher chance of having a life threatening complication either to her life or her fetus / newborns life at planned hospital birth, than if she plans to have an attended homebirth with a well - trained practitioner.

In this way there is reduced the risk of the infant death syndrome called cot death or SIDS that can happen because of the accidental suffocation when parents...

Swaddling also helps to reduce the risk of cot death and can be comforting when babies wake up suddenly in the night; when they realise that they are safe and comfortable, they will usually nod back off without waking the other baby up.

I think parents overestimate certain risks, such as the idea of this subway trip, and underestimate others, such as the idea that your kids are safer being constantly chauffeured around in your car, when vehicular accidents are the leading cause of child death!

The risk of death due to diarrhea and other infections increases when babies are either partially breastfed or not breastfed at all.

The increase in risk remained high even when overlying deaths were discounted (32 times higher) or the estimate of rates of bedsharing among living infants doubled (20 times higher).

Why is the risk of death (even though it may be small if done correctly, it is MUCH greater than crib sleeping) acceptable when a completely safe alternative exists?

A firm mattress is key when it comes to bed - sharing with kids younger than 1 year old due to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

To reduce the risk of Sudden Baby Death Syndrome (SIDS), your baby should be placed on her back when it's time to sleep.

This monitor is very useful in the first six months when there is a risk of sleep related deaths.

The reasons for this disapproval are manifold: that co sleeping increases the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) due to a parent rolling over on to or otherwise inadvertently smothering the child, that it increases a child's dependence on the parents for falling asleep, that it may interfere with the intimacy of a couple, and that process of separation when the child eventually sleeps apart from the parents may be difficult.

It is however a little misleading to promote the relative risks, when the absolute risk of neonatal death is low in both cases.

If you look at the death rate when high - risk pregnancies falsely classified as low - risk are included (midwives claim to only attend low - risk births), you've gotten up to 2.0 per thousand deaths and about 40 per thousand permanently injured for a total of 42 per thousand dead or permanently injured.