Sentences with phrase «risk of her baby dying»

If a mother is not receiving prenatal care, she has a much greater risk of her baby dying than if she is being managed by a physician.

Every labor and delivery carries the risk of the baby dying, especially if the mother is attended by an incompetent practitioner without adequate backup in case something goes wrong.

Your midwives saw to it that was maintained as well by not warning you that all of the data on homebirth in the US show a 3 - 8x higher risk of the baby dying in homebirth than in hospital birth.

And it's not like the risk of a baby dying at homebirth is greater than the risk of a baby dying in a car accident.

Again, it may be a woman's free right to have her baby at home... but you SHOULD care on some level if exercising HER rights increases the risk of her baby dying.

When parents place their sweet infant next to them in their bed, with all the pillows, sheets, and blankets, they are really raising the risk of their baby dying from SIDS.

«Our study highlights the importance of discussing weight loss with obese women prior to pregnancy because losing weight during pregnancy may increase the risk of her baby dying.

Achieving a healthy weight before becoming pregnant and gaining an appropriate amount of weight during pregnancy significantly reduce the risk of the baby dying in his or her first year of life, according to new research from the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.

Not exact matches

Putting many MANY studies together has been done, and going in for a repeat c - section with my fourth baby knowing that I had a more than 3-fold increased risk of dying on the table than if I was attempting a vaginal birth after 3 previous c - sections was hard to deal with.

An analysis of a nationally representative sample of about 9,000 U.S. babies found that breastfeeding decreased the risk of dying from any cause by about 20 percent, the researchers reported.

The risk of dying in the first six months of life for babies who receive infant formula is 14 times higher.

The babies that die outside of a hospital are almost always healthy, low risk babies.

This woman had the courage to accept that her decision to refuse induction resulted in the death of her baby, and she made a point of countering the «babies know when to be born / some babies just bake longer / babies aren't library books» with «My son died because he was postdates and I didn't understand the risks.»

In Oregon, babies die at the hands of CPMs at a much higher rate than they do in hospital, comparing low - risk women.

How many babies have to die before homebirth advocates understand that homebirth increases the risk of perinatal death?

Your Baby's Risk of SIDS May Be Linked to the Brain's Serotonin Levels Babies who die from sudden infant death syndrome make low amounts of the message - carrying brain chemical serotonin, needed to regulate sleep, breathing, and heart rate.

Test Leads to Needless C - Sections A 2006 analysis found that fetal heart monitoring failed to reduce the risk of a baby's dying late in pregnancy, during birth, or shortly after birth — and increased cesarean section rates and forceps deliveries, compared with listening to a baby's heart rate intermittently.

«NCT's own detailed review of home birth concluded that, although the quality of comparative evidence on the safety of home birth is poor, there is no evidence that for women with a low risk of complications the likelihood of a baby dying is any higher if they plan for a home birth compared with planning for a hospital birth.»

TERESA PITMAN: So the Triple Risk Model has been suggested by a bunch of researchers and what they think is that a baby dies of SIDS when three risk factors come togetRisk Model has been suggested by a bunch of researchers and what they think is that a baby dies of SIDS when three risk factors come togetrisk factors come together.

«Babies in the United States have a higher risk of dying during their first month of life than do babies born in 40 other countries, according to a new rBabies in the United States have a higher risk of dying during their first month of life than do babies born in 40 other countries, according to a new rbabies born in 40 other countries, according to a new report.

«Often the babies who died have overheated, because at that high risk age their thermal regulation system hasn't fully developed and the baby can't cool down, and they have either been between two adults or even on the end of the bed with the mother's arm around them.»

But it wasn't safer than a hospital birth, at least not if the definition of safety is was your baby more at risk of dying because she was born at home.

What hardly ever gets pointed out, in the «babies die in hospitals» [faux] argument is that, while, yes, babies do die in hospitals, it is after everything possible has been done to save them, whereas in homebirth babies are put at the utmost risk of death by not having proper staff / equipment / conditions, etc. to save them.

Guess what else still born babies are born all the time at hospitasl and babies, (often born to low risk mothers) die all the time, often BECAUSE of obstetrics interventions not despite them.

No one is claiming that 100 % of homebirth will end in disaster (if it was the case, humanity would have died long ago) But you had a higher risk of dying or losing you baby.

Women and their babies are at risk of dying in hospitals as well.

If I thought there was that big of a risk of dying or having my baby die, I wouldn't get pregnant.

Babies die all the time at homebirth, and the biggest risk factors lead to the greatest number of deaths.

If someone believes that their doctors think their baby will die, understands the risks of refusing treatment and still refuses - fine.

If someone if truly informed of this increased risk of their baby or themselves dying and they feel it is worth it, that is their choice to make.

Healthy, term babies of low risk mothers who were alive and well at the start of labour and died due to unnecessary interventions during labour, which means a normal labour, progressing without delay or signs of foetal distress and an OB intervened «just because».

What irritates me most about these people is that it never sinks in that there's a far greater risk of infant mortality in non-hospital births; they only seem to realize that there's a chance period that the baby could die, in the same way that a baby can die in any birth.

One of the big reasons is that it goes along with a failing placenta that puts a baby at a high risk of dying of stillbirth before labor even begins.

«as homebirthers we do have to consider the possibility of baby or mom dying at home, but the risk is very low»

Please point us toward the stories about term babies who were born to low risk women who had no known problems before birth that all of a sudden died in a hospital.

«Yes, as homebirthers we do have to consider the possibility of baby or mom dying at home, but the risk is very low, and much lower than dying from a staph infection from a hospital.»

Unattended birth and total lack of prenatal care, on the other hand, quite dramatically increase the risk that your baby will die.

Most low risk babies that are stillborn or die at birth, die as a result of congenital defects incompatible with life or unexplained stillbirths and would die no matter where the birth takes place.

Michelle — if you're not scare by a 3 — 4X chance of your baby dying (and who knows how many more times risk of hypoxic brain damage), what made you choose hospital birth?

According to the Harvard Medical School Family Health Guide, breastfeeding your newborn baby reduces her risk of a number of health problems, from diarrhea to bacterial meningitis, and it can reduce your baby's chances of dying from sudden infant death syndrome.

It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of infant mortality, if massive, high tech, emergency, intervention, which is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies at some later date (and it will be higher risk for the rest of infancy, at least, due to prematurity).

All of these studies profess to count how many babies supposedly die at planned attended low risk homebirth, but none of them do.

The probability of a baby dying from a home birth is approximately twice the probability of a child dying in a car accident at any point from birth to age 25, and ten times as high as the risk of dying in a car accident between birth and age 10.

Part of the comforting myth that says all «normal» women are low risk and only those who shouldn't be having children anyway should pay attention to risk, babies who die weren't meant to live and so on and so forth.

We know from the UK Birthplace study that, with fully trained MWs cooperating within the health system, tight risk - out and 40 % transfer rate, the babies of first - time mothers still die at 3X the rate of similar hospital births (quite aside from hypoxic and physical injury).

I would still take my c - section babies being actually born alive with a higher risk of diabetes / obesity / asthma than I would them dying during birth all day every day.

So continuing to smoke even if you don't breastfeed will increase your baby's risk of dying, and breastfeeding itself actually reduces the risk of SIDS.

Culturally being straight forward for safety is not always accepted but the risk of a baby getting hurt or even dying outweighs all the consequences for me and I will always be found teaching safest and best practice.

Meaning, for every 10,000 births of low risk women, there are 6 - 7 babies that die in the USA during planned, midwife - attended home births that would have lived if the mothers were giving birth at home in the Netherlands.

Maybe we shouldn't put our babies in cars since they are at a high risk of dying each time.