Cough suppressants are not recommended in more severe cases because there is
a risk of immunosuppression that will not allow extra fluid or mucous to drain out.
Not exact matches
The data suggest that this
immunosuppression - only approach could benefit patients with DC — and, perhaps, other bone marrow failure syndromes — who are at high
risk of poor transplant outcomes because they can not tolerate the toxicity
of conventional or even reduced - intensity conditioning.
The researchers are continuing to follow participants to determine whether the benefits
of restoring near - normal blood glucose control and protection from severe hypoglycemic events will outweigh the
risks associated with chronic
immunosuppression.
In addition, no
immunosuppression is required, so patients would avoid related side effects such as an increased
risk of infection.
This is a desirable feature for a helper drug as it would reduce the
risk of treatment failure due to factors other than antibiotic resistance (e.g. biofilms,
immunosuppression, etc.), allow dose reduction for toxic antibiotics such as colistin, and possibly even prevent selection
of resistant mutants» says Guardabassi.
As such, PEC - Direct will require
immunosuppression therapy, and is being developed for type 1 diabetes patients that are at a higher
risk of death due to complications, such as severe hypoglycemic episodes, extreme glycemic lability and hypoglycemia unawareness.
To date, they have shown that BiTEs are: (1) highly - specific molecules that greatly reduce the
risk of toxicity; (2) have the ability to penetrate the blood - brain barrier and accumulate in intracerebral tumors; and (3) may potentially overcome multiple mechanisms
of immunosuppression present in patients with glioblastoma.
It has been well documented, and I'm sure your listeners are aware
of this, that excessive exercise has been correlated with
immunosuppression and increased
risk of infection.»
And so this is where I think the problem occurs with exercise, it has been well - documented, and I'm sure your listeners are aware
of this, that excessive exercise has been correlated with
immunosuppression and increased
risk of infection.
Any factor or disease that causes
immunosuppression increases the
risk of tumors occurring in your pet.
This may be problematic in the case
of an illness like ehrlichiosis where there is some question over the ability to ever reliably cure a patient and therefore some
risk of recurrence
of the illness when
immunosuppression occurs for any reason.
In a cat persistently (permanently) infected with the virus, there is significant
risk of developing many severe illnesses such as anaemia,
immunosuppression and cancer.
Why do I keep reading so many other peoples lawsuits where they were «exposed» to toxic chemicals and have been «put at increased
risk of having future health problems» while the toxic Manganese and Lead water I ingested injured my brain and caused permanent disability and life threatening Severe
Immunosuppression with cell counts so low my teeth have fallen out and why have I not been able to get compensation for my toxic water injuries that I did not cause?