Sentences with phrase «risk on any given trade»

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

«Depending on the pace Amazon would seek to enter the market, an acquisition such as Rite Aid could accelerate the pace and be a relatively low - risk acquisition given that it currently trades at an enterprise value of only about $ 5 billion.»

But given Trump's unwillingness to stake out clear positions on taxes and spending, and his enthusiasm for threatening trade wars with China and Mexico, supporting Trump could risk elevating the populist, protectionist wing of the Republican party over the significant chunk of Republicans who believe in cutting spending and promoting free trade.

As the calendar turned, a risk environment that was going strong on tax cuts, deregulation and free - market capitalism quickly gave way to 2018 themes of interventionism, trade wars and rising fiscal deficits.

Buffett has said he would do so as long as he could see a good chance to make money on a given deal — and on the condition Berkshire gets paid upfront by its trading partner, eliminating any of the counterparty risk that nearly helped bring down the financial system in 2008.

Digital tokens traded on a secondary market may give rise to risks of insufficient liquidity or volatile and opaque pricing.

We always have to justify the risk we are taking on any one trade, that's how you should think about every trade you take; justify the money you are laying on the line, and if you can't make a good case for risking that money given the setup and market structure, then don't take the trade.

This stop placement gives you a tighter stop distance which increases the potential risk reward on the trade.

Trading can be volatile and investors risk losing their investment on any given transaction.

Veronica Rubio from the Foreign Trade Association will outline the social risks in food supply chains, as well as give guidance on how to mitigate such risks.

Wallace admits that the resulting five - player trade, which brought underachieving Vin Baker to Boston, was «a calculated risk,» because the four years and $ 32 million left on Baker's contract gives the team a third player at maximum salary and restricts its ability to make a major trade until at least the 2005 - 06 season.

This gives them a far worse risk reward potential on the trade which makes it a lot harder to turn a profit on the trade, chasing trades is not how a skilled and patient trader behaves.

You need to define the 1R dollar risk per trade that you are comfortable with potentially losing on any given trade, and never exceed that amount.

Traders who vary their risk a lot from trade to trade inevitably end up on an emotional roller coaster of trading that typically results in them giving back all their trading profits and blowing out their accounts.

Stop - loss levels based on price action allows us to limit our risk while giving breathing space for our trades to wiggle.

As a trader, that's what we do too; we first consider the risk on the trade and then we consider the potential reward, how we can obtain the reward, and if it's realistically possible to obtain it given the surrounding market structure, and then we make our final decision about the trade.

For instance, a swing trading system will give you more pips because trading moves on the daily chart means you risk more pips and target more as well.

For proof that you should not worry about being right or wrong on any given trade, let's discuss the topic of risk reward...

(A scalp or intra-day trade may only yield 10 pips before it reverses; a swing may give 100) It is also really important to know how much capital you can risk on a trade, or even in a day of trading if you are planning multiple trades.

Back to our example... you have found a great looking pin bar strategy on the daily chart, now you must find the safest place to put your stop loss so that the probability of it getting hit is as low as possible, you want to give the trade as much room as possible to work out while still maximizing your risk to reward scenario.

If you're looking to give your portfolio just that little extra oomph without the taking on too much risk or the headache of tracking your investments, consider exchange - traded funds or ETFs.

If you truly manage your risk effectively on every trade, you aren't going to make a lot of money really fast, and if you don't manage your risk effectively on every trade, you might get lucky and hit some big winners, but ultimately you will give it all back in an emotional tailspin of trading mistakes.

Part of trading successfully involves giving the market room to breathe, you are going to be the LEAST emotional BEFORE you enter the market, and so it only makes sense to do all your «thinking» and analysis BEFORE you risk your money, not WHILE your money is on the line.

Because I trade with such patience and precision, the winning trades I have typically double or triple the 1R risk I gave up on any of my losers.

Risking 1 % to 2 % of your capital in any one trade usually gives you a zero percent risk of ruin but it also depends on your systems win / loss ratio.

Traders often make one or two mistakes when it comes to determining risk; they either define the reward first, which is a mistake born out of greed, or they put a stop loss on the setup that is much too close to the entry to give the trade a chance at working out.

The first thing that all traders should do upon spotting a price action setup, or any trade setup, is calculate the risk they will have to take on in order to give the setup a realistic chance at working out.

The traders, investors, and hedge funds that blew up generally made the error of having «all in» big bets that did not work out, letting an ego keep them on the wrong side of a trade, or went into a position without an exit strategy giving themselves unlimited risk.

Trading can be volatile and investors risk losing their investment on any given transaction.

There is much discussion in the media these days about risk and whether market participants are embracing either a «risk on» or a «risk off» trading mentality on any given day.

Keeping stop losses in at night can manage catastrophic risk but gives up some profit over time since we would miss profiting from the big overnight gaps in the direction of the trade that would be capture if only traded on 24 hour session data.

The exact number of companies that an investor owns is ultimately a subjective decision based on the balance between risk, trading costs, emotional stress, and the time and effort costs of watching a given number of companies.

For these providers, they feel better not having to take on so much assumed risk, and as a trade - off, they are willing to give better prices to drivers with a demonstrable record of safety.

Digital tokens traded on a secondary market may give rise to risks of insufficient liquidity or volatile and opaque pricing