Sentences with phrase «risk out of publishing»

In essence, a traditional publisher takes the financial risk out of publishing a book for the author by assuming the entire burden of production and distribution.

Not exact matches

The SRF sponsored its first CHD research project in 1965, a literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which singled out fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes of CHD and downplayed evidence that sucrose consumption was also a risk factor.
Even just a cursory Internet search shows that breastfeeding promotion materials framed in terms of «the risks of formula feeding» are currently being used by some state breastfeeding coalitions, two hospitals, two private corporations, the Departments of Public Health in California and New York, the City of New York, as well as The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) programs in at least five states... The United States Department of Health and Human Services» Office on Women's Health publishes a 50 - page guide to breastfeeding that points out that «among formula - fed babies, ear infections and diarrhea are more common».
«Raising the stakes on tax avoidance», a consultation document published by HM Revenue and Customs, sets out a number of proposals relating to the promotion and use of so - called high - risk avoidance schemes, aimed at reducing the use of such schemes.1 Commenting, CIOT President Stephen Coleclough said: «Those members of the public who become end users of high risk avoidance schemes are sometimes misled by the promoters of such schemes and are not fully made aware of the risks or consequences of their decisions.
They identified the total number of cases in the US in 2015 and worked out how many of these cases were likely due to the use of tanning devices, by using data on prevalence of use of tanning devices and previously published estimates of relative risk — the likelihood of having the disease for people who use tanning devices compared to people who don't.
Lundberg once published an anonymous letter whose author, a citizen of a dictatorial country, «was risking his life» by speaking out, but Lundberg also believes that risk of career damage, not just a death threat, can justify anonymity.
In a letter published by British newspaper The Guardian today, Owen Paterson, the United Kingdom's secretary of state for the environment and rural affairs, wrote to Syngenta that his government is «extremely disappointed that the Commission decided to propose significant restrictions on neonicotinoids on the basis of the partial risk assessment carried out by EFSA using unfinished and unagreed guidance.»
The latest negative findings mentioned by Time come out of a $ 24 - million research project published in the International Journal of Epidemiology («Brain Tumour Risk in Relation to Mobile Telephone Use»).
Call for concern Mindful of both the potential and the risks, Esvelt, a bioengineer at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, brought together a group of scientists to write a Comment in Science, published last week, laying out the need for multiple containment strategies for gene - drive research that is done in the laboratory.
Her research, published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association, changed all that, laying out a specific weightlifting regimen that has proven to not only improve symptoms in women who already have the dreaded limb - swelling condition called lymphedema, but also to stave it off altogether among those at risk.
Flavonoids are natural phytochemicals that flush out toxins in your body, and in addition a study published in WebMD suggests that these also reduce your risk of developing a heart condition, aside from improving your general sense of wellbeing.
All the same I sincerely hope you decide to check out some of the published, peer - reviewed journal articles in the link below that provide a more sober and realistic assessment of the potential benefits and risks of low - carb eating.
Following the uncovering of certain government secrets that had been kept hidden for many years, Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) leads the Washington Post, as Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), the editor in chief of the paper, sets out to do whatever is necessary in order to be the first newspaper to publish this article, even if it means risking their empire altogether.
However having professionals willing to risk money on publishing my book — something they selected out of thousands of competitors — means I won't look back and wish I did something better.
The point is that James Patterson's publishing deal isn't working for James Patterson, so why on earth would someone starting out today sign up for that kind of risk?
To get their book in print or just get their name out there despite the risks of being labled «self - published».
And if the reader fans are also any indication of the willingness of consumers to branch out and take a risk on self - published authors, the shift may go even further than a handful of spots peppered throughout the list.
The problem with publishing today, though, is that its driven by greed, and that's driving debut writers to self - publish rather than risk getting rejected because a) they didn't walk into the toilet stall of their favorite author and politely ask for a blurb, or b) they discovered they'd rather spend what free time they have writing, and not marketing or frequenting social venues to make connections that may or may not pan out.
These are all questions a self - publishing author needs to know and now writers can realistically find out the answers before the actual publication of their book, minimizing the risk factor of self - publishing.
«Outs has become a risk - adverse industry that more and more puts all of its eggs in the same baskets year in, year out: a few brand - name authors, yet there are more than one thousand traditionally published every month.
Indie self - publishers who feel shut out should consider the cost of entry that big publishing houses pay — and consider the risk you ask them to take on your first novel.
Due diligence tends to be expensive and when it comes to cryptocurrency economies and ICOs, the market is beginning to see the presence of rating agencies, who conduct the due diligence, carrying out the necessary analysis of the information at hand, with the rating agencies publishing their research reducing some of the risks associated with investing in ICOs, self - policing coming in ahead of any more formal regulatory oversight.
I'd asked Pierrrehumbert to reflect on the time - scale conundrum laid out in the Nature Climate Change paper in the context of another important and provocative proposal by Princeton's Robert Socolow, published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in December, proposing a new field of inquiry — Destiny Studies — to examine the tough intersection of ethics, risk perception and science.
The scientific community has convened conferences, published reports, spoken out at forums and proclaimed, through statements by virtually every national scientific academy and relevant major scientific organization — including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)-- that climate change puts the well - being of people of all nations at risk.
And a third study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, spells out the importance of the Paris Agreement when it comes to global risk.
The BSB recently set out its risk based approach to regulation in a series of documents published in April.
PRA has published a policy and supervisory statement setting out its expectation of the model risk management practices firms should adopt when using stress test models.
The international NGO Human Rights Watch recently published a report on the upcoming Beijing Summer Olympics that states that the «corporate sponsors of the Olympics risk lasting damage to their brands if they do not live up to their professed standards of corporate social responsibility by speaking out about the deteriorating human rights situation in China.»
As pointed out elsewhere, contracting authorities and review courts should be particularly careful in not imposing excessive disclosure when there are actual risks of strategic use of challenge procedures or the market structure is such that the increased degree of transparency could (inadvertently) facilitate or reinforce collusion [Sanchez Graells, A. Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2011) 358 - 9].
My suggestion would be to adopt the kind of approach laid out by John F. Brown Jr. in a law.com article about risk - sharing fee arrangements published last New Year's Eve.
(vii) You understand agree that (section 41 of Insurance Act): a) No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take out or renew or continue an insurance in respect of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a Policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insurers.
No person shall allow or offer to allow, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take, renew or continue insurance in respect of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except for such a rebate that is allowed in accordance with the published prospectus or tables of the insurer
Sections Of The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act 2015 Section 41 No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take or renew or continue an insurance in respect of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureOf The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act 2015 Section 41 No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take or renew or continue an insurance in respect of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insureof the insurer.
Zimperium, the mobile security firm that discovered an Android security bug that can potentially put hundreds of millions of devices at risk, has published the Stagefright security code, as Google and its partners scramble to roll out a fix.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z