In essence, a traditional publisher takes the financial
risk out of publishing a book for the author by assuming the entire burden of production and distribution.
Not exact matches
The SRF sponsored its first CHD research project in 1965, a literature review
published in the New England Journal
of Medicine, which singled
out fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes
of CHD and downplayed evidence that sucrose consumption was also a
risk factor.
Even just a cursory Internet search shows that breastfeeding promotion materials framed in terms
of «the
risks of formula feeding» are currently being used by some state breastfeeding coalitions, two hospitals, two private corporations, the Departments
of Public Health in California and New York, the City
of New York, as well as The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) programs in at least five states... The United States Department
of Health and Human Services» Office on Women's Health
publishes a 50 - page guide to breastfeeding that points
out that «among formula - fed babies, ear infections and diarrhea are more common».
«Raising the stakes on tax avoidance», a consultation document
published by HM Revenue and Customs, sets
out a number
of proposals relating to the promotion and use
of so - called high -
risk avoidance schemes, aimed at reducing the use
of such schemes.1 Commenting, CIOT President Stephen Coleclough said: «Those members
of the public who become end users
of high
risk avoidance schemes are sometimes misled by the promoters
of such schemes and are not fully made aware
of the
risks or consequences
of their decisions.
They identified the total number
of cases in the US in 2015 and worked
out how many
of these cases were likely due to the use
of tanning devices, by using data on prevalence
of use
of tanning devices and previously
published estimates
of relative
risk — the likelihood
of having the disease for people who use tanning devices compared to people who don't.
Lundberg once
published an anonymous letter whose author, a citizen
of a dictatorial country, «was
risking his life» by speaking
out, but Lundberg also believes that
risk of career damage, not just a death threat, can justify anonymity.
In a letter
published by British newspaper The Guardian today, Owen Paterson, the United Kingdom's secretary
of state for the environment and rural affairs, wrote to Syngenta that his government is «extremely disappointed that the Commission decided to propose significant restrictions on neonicotinoids on the basis
of the partial
risk assessment carried
out by EFSA using unfinished and unagreed guidance.»
The latest negative findings mentioned by Time come
out of a $ 24 - million research project
published in the International Journal
of Epidemiology («Brain Tumour
Risk in Relation to Mobile Telephone Use»).
Call for concern Mindful
of both the potential and the
risks, Esvelt, a bioengineer at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, brought together a group
of scientists to write a Comment in Science,
published last week, laying
out the need for multiple containment strategies for gene - drive research that is done in the laboratory.
Her research,
published in the New England Journal
of Medicine and the Journal
of the American Medical Association, changed all that, laying
out a specific weightlifting regimen that has proven to not only improve symptoms in women who already have the dreaded limb - swelling condition called lymphedema, but also to stave it off altogether among those at
risk.
Flavonoids are natural phytochemicals that flush
out toxins in your body, and in addition a study
published in WebMD suggests that these also reduce your
risk of developing a heart condition, aside from improving your general sense
of wellbeing.
All the same I sincerely hope you decide to check
out some
of the
published, peer - reviewed journal articles in the link below that provide a more sober and realistic assessment
of the potential benefits and
risks of low - carb eating.
Following the uncovering
of certain government secrets that had been kept hidden for many years, Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) leads the Washington Post, as Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), the editor in chief
of the paper, sets
out to do whatever is necessary in order to be the first newspaper to
publish this article, even if it means
risking their empire altogether.
However having professionals willing to
risk money on
publishing my book — something they selected
out of thousands
of competitors — means I won't look back and wish I did something better.
The point is that James Patterson's
publishing deal isn't working for James Patterson, so why on earth would someone starting
out today sign up for that kind
of risk?
To get their book in print or just get their name
out there despite the
risks of being labled «self -
published».
And if the reader fans are also any indication
of the willingness
of consumers to branch
out and take a
risk on self -
published authors, the shift may go even further than a handful
of spots peppered throughout the list.
The problem with
publishing today, though, is that its driven by greed, and that's driving debut writers to self -
publish rather than
risk getting rejected because a) they didn't walk into the toilet stall
of their favorite author and politely ask for a blurb, or b) they discovered they'd rather spend what free time they have writing, and not marketing or frequenting social venues to make connections that may or may not pan
out.
These are all questions a self -
publishing author needs to know and now writers can realistically find
out the answers before the actual publication
of their book, minimizing the
risk factor
of self -
publishing.
«
Outs has become a
risk - adverse industry that more and more puts all
of its eggs in the same baskets year in, year
out: a few brand - name authors, yet there are more than one thousand traditionally
published every month.
Indie self - publishers who feel shut
out should consider the cost
of entry that big
publishing houses pay — and consider the
risk you ask them to take on your first novel.
Due diligence tends to be expensive and when it comes to cryptocurrency economies and ICOs, the market is beginning to see the presence
of rating agencies, who conduct the due diligence, carrying
out the necessary analysis
of the information at hand, with the rating agencies
publishing their research reducing some
of the
risks associated with investing in ICOs, self - policing coming in ahead
of any more formal regulatory oversight.
I'd asked Pierrrehumbert to reflect on the time - scale conundrum laid
out in the Nature Climate Change paper in the context
of another important and provocative proposal by Princeton's Robert Socolow,
published in the Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists in December, proposing a new field
of inquiry — Destiny Studies — to examine the tough intersection
of ethics,
risk perception and science.
The scientific community has convened conferences,
published reports, spoken
out at forums and proclaimed, through statements by virtually every national scientific academy and relevant major scientific organization — including the American Association for the Advancement
of Science (AAAS)-- that climate change puts the well - being
of people
of all nations at
risk.
And a third study,
published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences, spells
out the importance
of the Paris Agreement when it comes to global
risk.
The BSB recently set
out its
risk based approach to regulation in a series
of documents
published in April.
PRA has
published a policy and supervisory statement setting
out its expectation
of the model
risk management practices firms should adopt when using stress test models.
The international NGO Human Rights Watch recently
published a report on the upcoming Beijing Summer Olympics that states that the «corporate sponsors
of the Olympics
risk lasting damage to their brands if they do not live up to their professed standards
of corporate social responsibility by speaking
out about the deteriorating human rights situation in China.»
As pointed
out elsewhere, contracting authorities and review courts should be particularly careful in not imposing excessive disclosure when there are actual
risks of strategic use
of challenge procedures or the market structure is such that the increased degree
of transparency could (inadvertently) facilitate or reinforce collusion [Sanchez Graells, A. Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules (Oxford, Hart
Publishing, 2011) 358 - 9].
My suggestion would be to adopt the kind
of approach laid
out by John F. Brown Jr. in a law.com article about
risk - sharing fee arrangements
published last New Year's Eve.
(vii) You understand agree that (section 41
of Insurance Act): a) No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take
out or renew or continue an insurance in respect
of any kind
of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate
of the whole or part
of the commission payable or any rebate
of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking
out or renewing or continuing a Policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the
published prospectuses or tables
of the insurers.
No person shall allow or offer to allow, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take, renew or continue insurance in respect
of any kind
of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate
of the whole or part
of the commission payable or any rebate
of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking
out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except for such a rebate that is allowed in accordance with the
published prospectus or tables
of the insurer
Sections
Of The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act 2015 Section 41 No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take or renew or continue an insurance in respect of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
Of The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act 2015 Section 41 No person shall allow or offer to allow, either directly or indirectly, as an inducement to any person to take or renew or continue an insurance in respect
of any kind of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
of any kind
of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
of risk relating to lives or property in India, any rebate
of the whole or part of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
of the whole or part
of the commission payable or any rebate of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
of the commission payable or any rebate
of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the published prospectuses or tables of the insure
of the premium shown on the policy, nor shall any person taking
out or renewing or continuing a policy accept any rebate, except such rebate as may be allowed in accordance with the
published prospectuses or tables
of the insure
of the insurer.
Zimperium, the mobile security firm that discovered an Android security bug that can potentially put hundreds
of millions
of devices at
risk, has
published the Stagefright security code, as Google and its partners scramble to roll
out a fix.