Not exact matches
On the household - debt - to - disposable - income
ratio, some experts see it as just one number out of many and insist that consideration must be
given to the composition of the debt, such as how much of it is high
risk.
If you want to test my theory, have your spouse, or parent add you as an A.U. on a couple of their cards without even
giving you the physical card (to avoid
risk if they worry about abuse) watch your scores go through the statosphere if the balances are low because it increases your presumed available amount of credit and expands your
ratio of credit vs balances
This
gives us a
risk to reward
ratio of greater than 1:2.
Presently, we remain long IYR with a profit that is two times greater than our initial
risk,
giving us our intended 2 to 1 reward -
risk ratio.
Going back to your post a couple days ago where Bob Brown
gave his forecast for equity returns of about 6 % (3.2 % after tax and inflation), if you
give up another 2 % + in expense
ratio, an investor might as well put their money in long term certificates of deposit and eliminate
risk.
It showed an 89 percent
risk increase (odds
ratio = 1.89), although statistical confidence intervals were not
given.
Give us some odds
ratios, relative
risks, some actual numerical metric that
gives us a sense of the relative
risk, absolute
risk, or both.
Risk figures are always
given as
ratios or percents.
Other factors, including family history and whether and when a woman has
given birth, also change a woman's
risk / benefit
ratio.
Give that Cox
risk adjustment for those 3 confounders back to the 40 km runners in the ACLS study and their all - cause mortality hazard
ratio would still be 0.84 or 0.89 (depending on which near - 40 km cohort is chosen), vs the 0.73 for the 20 km runners.
A high compression
ratio gives greater efficiency, but in certain applications poses the
risk of premature combustion (knocking).
Metrics such as the standard deviation of returns and value at
risk are more absolute -
risk measures, while beta and the Sharpe
ratio give a sense of
risk / return versus a
given benchmark.
I like it because you
give yourself a better
risk to reward
ratio when it happens.
we have to take decision at the end of 6 months when
risk reward
ratio as per our analysis say it can not
give more than 20 % annualized return from there onward and on the other hand some other cheap stock are waiting for us... Even if one stock which we just sold after earlier will become multi baggar does not mean law of probability say us to hold it..
The specific balance of stocks and bonds in a
given portfolio is designed to create a specific
risk - reward
ratio that offers the opportunity to achieve a certain rate of return on your investment in exchange for your willingness to accept a certain amount of
risk.
Looking into the payout
ratio, discussed below, will
give you an idea if that high yield is at
risk.
Among other things they want the limitations to reflect the value at
risk, relax requirements to post cash, and
give greater leeway if a fund temporarily exceeds the
ratio.
We view National Retail as conservatively financed compared to most REITs
given its leverage
ratios and debt maturity schedule, but this is an important
risk to remain aware of for all of your REIT holdings.
I always strive to ensure the potential reward from a
given trade setup outweighs the
risk by a minimum
ratio of three to one.
The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation have been
given the task of insuring these high
ratio mortgages so that the
risk is minimized for the lenders and the borrowers.
There's also an academic Modern Portfolio Theory explanation for why you should diversify among risky assets (aka stocks), something like: for a
given desired
risk / return
ratio, it's better to leverage up a diverse portfolio than to use a non-diverse portfolio, because
risk that can be eliminated through diversification is not compensated by increased returns.
Figure 1 shows how strategies that attempt to manage volatility or
risk gave a higher Sharpe
ratio, with a lower drawdown and volatility — but, in many cases, also deliver a lower return.
If you want to test my theory, have your spouse, or parent add you as an A.U. on a couple of their cards without even
giving you the physical card (to avoid
risk if they worry about abuse) watch your scores go through the statosphere if the balances are low because it increases your presumed available amount of credit and expands your
ratio of credit vs balances
For TAVF, the
risk - reward
ratio trade - off is non-existent; the lower the price in a
given situation, the less the
risk and the greater potential for reward.
The lower the Loan - to - Value
ratio the better because it
gives some protection against the
risk of a decline in property or home values (prices) which can adversely affect the MIE if it has to pay for expenses associated to selling the property that has been used as collateral such as legal fees, realtor commissionsCommissions What you pay to a broker or agent for their services.
Viewing projected alpha and relative
risk together
gives us an insight into the likely information
ratios currently available in these factors.
The rating I try to
give stocks is my perceived ranking of the
risk / reward
ratio of the various ideas, so the highest rated stocks should provide the best
risk adjusted returns.
Risking 1 % to 2 % of your capital in any one trade usually
gives you a zero percent
risk of ruin but it also depends on your systems win / loss
ratio.
SPLS and GRMN, however, do
give reason to pause and do additional research because of their high
ratios (their dividends could be at
risk of reduction if earnings do not improve).
We recommend not to excede a loan to value
ratio of 75 % since this a reasonable amount of
risk for a lender and will therefore
give the borrower a lower rate of interest.
These rules should be ingrained in our minds thoroughly for applying these in practical situations without
giving importance to the emotional pressures, so that we will patiently wait to see for ONLY the solid set ups with good
risk - reward
ratio.
This
ratio can decrease the likelihood that a bank will
give you a mortgage or it will decrease the size of the mortgage that they're willing to
give you since they see your debt as a
risk.
The Treynor
Ratio relates the difference between the portfolio return and the
risk - free rate to the portfolio beta for a
given time period.
An earnings yield of 6 % to 7 % (P / E
ratio 15) would be the minimum that a rational investor should expect
given the
risk associated with investing in common stocks.
The Ladies also look at timeliness (a prediction of how fast a stock's price will grow compared to other stocks - stocks are
given a number of 1 to 5, with one being the highest and the best); safety (the volatility of a stock's price around its own long term trend); beta (the volatility of a stock's price relative to the total market) and upside - down
ratios (the
ratio between the projected potential gain per share divided by the
risk of loss per share).
In such cases, the Sharpe
ratio would not
give an accurate representation of the investment's
risk / return profile (see Figure 6).
So why don't lenders offer a true reverse mortage which would compute and lend a stream of payments (at interest of course, but hopefully a rate reflective of the low
risk given the high property value / loan
ratio) rather than a useless lump sum which has seniors paying pretty high mortgage interest rates on a large amount of loan, rather than a interest on the (rising) amount of loan as the stream of payments accumulated.
Given that stocks with high - dividend - to - price
ratios have low
risk, the authors suggest this outcome is a result of the volatility of the difference portfolio.
Most importantly, in the NS & ME case (Case C - 411 / 10 and C - 493 / 10), decided in December 2011, the CJEU followed the
ratio of MSS, holding that «Dublin» transfers must be suspended where the transferring State can not be unaware of systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the responsible State which
give rise to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker will face a real
risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 4 of the Charter.
The rates are for borrower - paid annual premiums for non fixed rate mortgages and based on LTV
ratios, the coverages offered within each
ratio, and the cost of the premiums for each PMI policy
given the
risk pool (the FICO score of the borrower).
Given the huge upside price potential of a Bitcoin ETF approval and limited downside as the price of bitcoin has been stabilizing, it is not surprising that more traders are buying bitcoin and, thereby, pushing up the price as bitcoin's current
risk / return
ratio is positively skewed toward the upside.
A poor performance on a test of visuospatial reasoning predicted higher
risks of schizophrenia, but arithmetic reasoning and verbal reasoning do not appear to have predicted schizophrenia from the data presented; none of the performance categories differed significantly from the reference category, but the odds
ratios for trend were not
given.