Sentences with phrase «risk ratio needs»

Your reward to risk ratio needs to be determined by what kind of setup and follow through your trading system actually provides you.

Not exact matches

«As growth slows and risk of deflation heightens, we reiterate that China needs to cut reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by another 50bps in Q4,» ANZ economists Li - gang Liu and Louis Lam, said in a note.

By placing the increasingly complex buyers journey in a visual context, sales teams gain the clarity they need to identify critical knowledge gaps, potential risks, and common delay indicators so they can take the best next step to increase win ratios and reduce deal slippage.

To be fair to the angel investors, and provide them with a reasonable risk - reward ratio, the percentage discounts need to be much higher.

You must devise a trading strategy that exhibits a minimum risk - to - reward ratio of 1 to 2 because you need to cater for inescapable losses as a basic component of your trading plans.

NTU assesses equities based on their risk / reward ratio as upside potential needs to always be measured against the downside risk.

To conclude, considering all the links to obesity, diabetes, high bp, heart risks and altered brain functioning - the need for sleep is far more than seeing results from your diet and exercise, while all three of them in the right ratio work wonders as a combo.

Because of the efficient cooling and the decreased risk of detonation, the Vortec 4200 was able to run its high compression ratio without the need for premium fuel.

If we aim for a risk reward ratio of 1:2 on every trade we take, we only need to be right about 35 to 40 % of the time to make a decent profit.

As you can see from the graphic above, the higher your reward to risk ratio is, the fewer trades you need to win to be profitable.

You need a high trading probability to even out the low risk vs reward ratio.

We need to be sure a decent risk reward ratio is possible on a trade; otherwise it's really not worth taking.

only one thing I don't understand: If you need 50 % of wins to BE on a 1:1 risk: reward ratio, 33 % on a 1:2 r: r and 25 % on a 1:3 r: r shouldn't you need just over those figures to make profit??

Need 40 lakh for Girl child education and marriage in span of 15 - 20 years Risk ability: Moderate Investment horizon: 20 years Debt - Equity ratio: 30 - 70 % (investing last 6 months) Emergency fund: Keeping 3 - 4 months of monthly income Medical coverage: Have term plan of 50L, will need to take for my pareNeed 40 lakh for Girl child education and marriage in span of 15 - 20 years Risk ability: Moderate Investment horizon: 20 years Debt - Equity ratio: 30 - 70 % (investing last 6 months) Emergency fund: Keeping 3 - 4 months of monthly income Medical coverage: Have term plan of 50L, will need to take for my pareneed to take for my parents.

However, you might use this technique if you needed a price improvement to achieve your minimum reward to risk ratio before running into a possible area of support.

You need to decide if the tradeoff for lower risk and potential higher returns is worth paying a higher expense ratio.

I believe that companies most at risk of cutting their dividends emit a number of warning signs well before a reduction is announced — sales and earnings are usually falling, the balance sheet is overleveraged, payout ratios are unsustainable, management hasn't shown to be overly committed to maintaining the dividend, and the company needs to preserve cash.

To get a better Reward / Risk ratio, i ve wait for a retracement and place a buy order at $ 416 and my take profit at $ 467 By aiming for a 4.31 Reward to risk ratio i only need to bRisk ratio, i ve wait for a retracement and place a buy order at $ 416 and my take profit at $ 467 By aiming for a 4.31 Reward to risk ratio i only need to brisk ratio i only need to be...

Their (un)- recognized bad debts, their risk aversion, their need for higher capital ratios, and their increased regulatory burden have all pushed them inevitably into de-leveraging mode also.

We need well - defined support - resistance levels, a defined reward / risk ratio on both sides of the equation, clean price triggers and a big picture that lets us execute in either direction.

The benefit / risk ratio of a need or task is assessed continuously, in order to measure known or newly identified adverse effects.

Consuming sufficient omega - 3 in the right EFA ratio has impressive benefits, including: reducing cholesterol, reducing the risk of atherosclerosis and sudden cardiac death, reducing the need for insulin among diabetics, decreasing the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, promoting mood improvement in bipolar disorders, and optimizing development in infants.

Of the covariates, only income / needs ratio was significant and did not alter the relationship between parenting style and overweight risk.