Sentences with phrase «risk score compare»

Not exact matches

They found that of those participants who had a bachelor's degree or higher that scored high in resilience, 8 percent were at risk for depression compared to 33 percent of college - educated individuals who scored low on the resilience scale.
A Return Score of 1 means the returns are horrible compared to the risk - free rate.
In general, a borrower with a higher number will be viewed as a lower risk (a «safer bet,» if you will) compared to someone with a lower score.
For the subscale «performance IQ», children breast fed for less than three months had a higher risk, compared to children breast fed for at least six months, of having a low IQ score (OR = 2.2; 95 % CI: 1.1 to 1.4).
Estimates of the risk (odds ratio) of getting a «low» WPPSI - R score at age 5 years among children breast fed for less than 3 months compared to children breast fed for six months or more, adjusted for maternal age, education, smoking, and Raven score
A single, small, retrospective case - control study examined the use of newborn transient evoked otoacoustic emission hearing screening tests as a tool for identifying infants at subsequent risk of SIDS.343 Infants who subsequently died from SIDS did not fail their hearing tests but, compared with controls, showed a decreased signal - to - noise ratio score in the right ear only (at frequencies of 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz).
RESULTS Children breast fed for less than 3 months had an increased risk, compared to children breast fed for at least 6 months, of a test score below the median value of MDI at 13 months and of WPPSI - R at 5 years.
Estimates of the risk (odds ratio) of getting a «low» Bayley score at 13 months of age among children breast fed for less than 3 months compared to children who were breast fed for 6 months or more
Odds ratio (OR) was calculated and used as an estimate of the relative risk of getting a low test score among children who had been breast fed less than three months, compared to children who had been breast fed at least six months.
Women with the highest antioxidant scores had a reduction in diabetes risk of 27 % compared with those with the lowest scores.
Compared to patients with low - risk disease, those with intermediate - risk cancer (PSA > 10ng / ml or Gleason score 7 or clinical stage T2b / 2c) had a nearly four-fold higher chance of dying from prostate cancer within 15 years.
Higher scores were associated with an almost 50 percent larger risk of hip fracture in Caucasian women younger than 63, compared with the risk for women in the group with the lowest inflammatory scores.
Comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of dietary diabetes risk reduction score, healthy diet was associated with a 48 % lower risk of diabetes in white, 42 % in Asian, 55 % in Hispanic, and 32 % in black women.
When all the minority women were combined into one group, those in the highest quartile of dietary score had a 36 % lower risk of diabetes compared with women in the lowest quartile.
A higher risk of epilepsy was also observed in babies who scored a full 10 points at five minutes and then 9 at ten minutes compared to babies that had top scores at both times.
In the study, researchers compared polygenic risk scores between study participants with and without early - onset heart disease.
In external validation analyses, a genetic score consisting of variants with naturally occurring discordance between levels of LDL - C and apoB was associated with a similar risk of CHD per unit change in apoB level (OR, 0.782 [95 % CI, 0.720 - 0.845] vs 0.793 [95 % CI, 0.774 - 0.812]; P =.79 for difference), but a significantly attenuated risk of CHD per unit change in LDL - C level (OR, 0.916 [95 % CI, 0.890 - 0.943] vs 0.831 [95 % CI, 0.816 - 0.847]; P <.001) compared with a genetic score associated with concordant changes in levels of LDL - C and apoB.
By comparing grade cohorts who faced different degrees of accountability pressure, we can ascertain how much their level of risk affects not only 10th - grade exam scores but also how much schooling they completed and their earnings later in life.
Students who attend middle schools at risk of dropping out of high school As compared to students in K - 8 elementary schools, middle school students also score lower on achievement tests.
If value - added scores are sensitive to these factors, we can revise the analysis to ensure that the classrooms being compared are similar on measures of student background and school composition, thus reducing the risk of bias.
The Overall Vehicle Score combines the results of a frontal crash test, side crash tests and rollover resistance tests and compares those results to the average risk of injury and potential for vehicle rollover of other vehicles to give vehicles an indexed single score that consumers can use for comparison when vehicle shopScore combines the results of a frontal crash test, side crash tests and rollover resistance tests and compares those results to the average risk of injury and potential for vehicle rollover of other vehicles to give vehicles an indexed single score that consumers can use for comparison when vehicle shopscore that consumers can use for comparison when vehicle shopping.
Borrowers with credit scores under 740 or 720 may want to compare their options for conventional and FHA refinancing, because while FHA loans require mortgage insurance, they do not have risk - based interest rates as conventional mortgages do.
In general, a borrower with a higher number will be viewed as a lower risk (a «safer bet,» if you will) compared to someone with a lower score.
Lenders assign the highest scores to consumers who pose the lowest risks — that is, consumers who consistently pay their bills on time and carry small amounts of debt compared to their overall borrowing capacities.
It does this by comparing the default rate from a given lender to the average default rate for all FHA loans, regardless of credit score or other risk factors.
As the strongest predictors of future credit risk, missed payments are the hardest mistakes for your score to overcome, particularly when compared to the damage from high card balances, new accounts, inquiries and other red flags to future trouble.
In order to encourage lenders to loosen credit score requirements, some would like to see the Neighborhood Watch program altered so that default rates are not compared to the general FHA default rate, but are adjusted to account for risk factors such as lower credit scores.
By comparing this information to the patterns in hundreds of thousands of past credit reports, FICO ® Scores estimate your level of future credit risk.
By comparing this information to the patterns in hundreds of thousands of past credit reports, FICO ® Scores estimate your level of future credit risk.
Four a priori analyses were undertaken comparing outcomes for the hypothesised subgroups using 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA to assess main (intervention vs comparison group) effects and interaction (intervention by subgroup effects for mothers who were Australian - born vs overseas - born, first - time vs multiparous, had one vs multiple risk factors, and scored EDS ≥ 10 (antenatal psychosocial distress) vs EDS < 10), while maintaining the power of the whole sample.
Although the presence of these two risk factors was associated with markedly elevated depression scores within the maltreated cohort, maltreated children with only one of these risk factors had only modest increases in their depression scores compared with CCs.
The OR contrasts a high to a low score on the wave 1 risk factor (95th compared to 5th percentile).
Compared to an ACE score of zero, having four adverse childhood experiences was associated with a 700 % increase in alcoholism, twice the risk of being diagnosed with cancer, and a 400 % increase in emphysema; an ACE score above six was associated with a 3000 % increase in attempted suicide.
Analyses of CBCL and YSR were combined into one dichotomous outcome (CBCL or YSR T - score of 64 or higher) that revealed a significantly decreased risk for problems in the intervention group compared with the control group [RR = 0.11 (0.01 to 0.82)-RSB-.48 At the 15 - year follow - up, Aronen and Arajärvi found significant positive effects on YASR Total [0.37 (0.03 to 0.71)-RSB- and Internalising 0.36 [0.02 to 0.70)-RSB-.
In the case of limiting long - term illness, there was no clear increase in prevalence with higher family adversity score, although any score above zero was associated with a greater risk of limiting long - term illness compared to children with no family adversity.
Two hundred ninety - nine women and 299 men with a similar... clinical risk factor profile were matched on the propensity score and were compared with respect to their HRQoL.
To reduce the risk of chance findings, we began with omnibus tests comparing the 3 treatment groups on overall BPC total score and on TPA score, applying a familywise Bonferroni adjustment to correct for the 2 tests.
Subgroup effects were found for high - risk mothers in the TG, who reported more social support over time and, generally, had children with higher developmental scores compared to their CG counterparts.
Subjects in optimal glycemic control presented with significantly lower scores in most of YSR scales compared to subjects at high risk.
In general, a borrower with a higher number will be viewed as a lower risk (a «safer bet,» if you will) compared to someone with a lower score.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z