Sentences with phrase «risk than a safe»

Of course, stock market investing comes with more risk than a safe, low - yield savings account.

Of course, stock market investing comes with more risk than a safe, low - yield savings account does.

Not exact matches

Risk - takers tend to be more successful than those who like to play it safe.

LUSARDI: Question three has to do about risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.»

The company isn't afraid to take risks, which means that it's going to sometimes strike out, but it's also much more likely to hit an occasional home run than companies that are less innovative and play it too safe.

Again, when risk - aversion kicks in during the completion of a market cycle, central bank liquidity does not reliably support stocks, because safe liquidity is seen as a desirable asset rather than an inferior one.

Using cryptocurrency, is also extremely safer than real currency, as cryptocurrency, is 100 percent digital, so it eliminates the risks of being stolen in robberies or other relating crime that occurs in these countries.

Elsewhere the Japanese Yen slipped 0.06 % to ¥ 109.11 against the Dollar at the time of writing, easing geo - political risk and better than expected PMI numbers out of China supporting market risk appetite through the session, leading to a pullback in demand for the safe havens.

You're doubling down on the risks like that, as currently there are no safe investments that are guaranteed to return more than the mortgage rate for 25 years.

As was recently communicated by more than 80 prominent Canadian business leaders, organizations and communities, the global reputation of our country as a safe and secure place to invest and do business is at serious risk.

The reason is that when investors are inclined toward risk - aversion, safe liquidity is a desirable asset rather than an inferior one, so creating more of the stuff doesn't provoke speculation.

Churches would rather do something safe like a barn dance or a pie - and - pea supper or another barn dance because the first one went so well, rather than risk something as socially volatile as a comedy night as part of their outreach.

Why should they question whether a person who wishes to have an undesired fetus that will feed off the host body and cause pain, distension, and medical risk be removed through a process that is known to be fully effective and safer than waiting until it reaches a stage where it is expelled.

Being «safe rather than sorry» is a completely selfish motivation then, and I'd rather live my life unselfishly and risk the remote chance of hell than choose to accept beliefs that I can't justify in our modern society, some of which actually hurt others, just to save my butt.

Too many players being paid more than they are worth and this rebuild should aim to resolve that, cut out some now and force the rest to step up, without a rebuild then they are safer as they do not see any risk to not giving 110 % each day like Alexis does.

New Jaguars general manager David Caldwell may opt for the safe pick in Fisher rather than gambling on a high risk game - changer.

I realise the own goal got people talking, but I prefer to play with courage and throw myself in there with the risk of getting an unlucky own goal rather than just playing it safe.

But, as a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse and field hockey players to wear helmets will make the sports safer, or, as a result of the phenomenon called risk compensation, actually result in more, rather than fewer, head injuries.

Several studies have shown that planned homebirth attended by a qualified experienced caregiver is as safe or safer than hospital birth for low - risk women.

I have always believed in my gut that it is safer to have a CNM attend a homebirth in a low risk pregnancy than give birth in a hospital.

Rather than placing additional soft materials into a crib that can pose a suffocation risk, baby stays nice and warm as well as safe.

You wrote, «Every study I found said homebirth is safer for low risk woman than hospital birth.

I'm sorry, but the OliverB bumpers still look dangerous: all those ties and the width of the bumper is greater than the width of the space from the tip of a baby's nose to the span of her mouth, which is how you would mesure risk of suffocation and that would mean suffocation could still occur, so they are not that much safer: -LRB-

The Canadian study has an unusual way of calculating perinatal mortality, and the Dutch study points out that homebirth is as safe as hospital birth in the Netherlands without addressing the fact that the homebirth population is much lower risk than the hospital population.

As a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, and a member of ASTM International's subcommittee on standards for headgear and helmets, which is working with US Lacrosse on developing a new standard for headgear in women's lacrosse, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse players to wear helmets will make the sports safer, or, as a result of the phenomenon called risk compensation (also called the «gladiator effect»), will actually result in more, rather than fewer, head injuries.

But, as a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse and field hockey players to wear helmets will make the sports safer, or, as a result of risk compensation, actually result in more, rather than fewer, head injuries.

This may seem a little on the cool side, but babies are far safer being slightly cool than being at the risk of overheating.

Even if circumcision is proven to slightly lower the risk of acquiring an STD in the future, safe sexual practices (abstinence, fidelity and condoms) are more important and has more to do with preventing STDs than circumcision.

Homebirth is recognised as safe for low risk women, particularly if it is not the first time they are giving birth (i.e. slightly higher risk for primiparous women than multiparous) as per «Birth Place Study» — British Medical Journal 2011 — amongst other studies.

But it wasn't safer than a hospital birth, at least not if the definition of safety is was your baby more at risk of dying because she was born at home.

How can you trust that homebirth is safe when the most comprehensive study ever done of homebirth (and analyzed by a midwife) found that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED midwife has a death rate approximately 800 % higher than comparable risk hospital birth, and even MANA can't figure out how to criticize it?

The research in fact shows that in some cases home is safer for low risk mothers than hospital.

10) In a low - risk pregnancy attended by an experienced practitioner a home birth is just as safe (or safer) than the alternatives, and can be a really beautiful experience!

The results offer support to the concept that home birth for low - risk pregnancies is not necessarily less safe than conventional, hospital - based deliveries.

They didn't want to publish the results, but they were pressured into it, and are now trying to convince people that a death rate more than 5.5 X higher than comparable risk hospital birth is «safe.»

Lower estimations of how many people safely bedsharing in our population significantly makes crib sleeping look much, much safer than bedsharing because parents are not afraid to say that their babies sleep in cribs; but many who bedshare and their babies live, and are not therefore counted in relative risks of crib vs. bedsharing statistics.

Indeed, the rhetoric is nothing less than threatening, of any and all bedsharing parents even when risks are minimized; and the zeal and imprecise language which is being used by many technicians involved in what is considered «safe infant sleep» campaigns is over simplified to the point that it is inaccurate, misleading, and inappropriate, and is itself dangerous on many different levels, both politically and scientifically (see Gettler and McKenna 2010 available on this website).

But I think pumping and dumping is much safer than taking any risks with medications.

When the breastfeeding mother is under - nourished, it is safer, easier, and less expensive to give her more food than to expose an infant under six months of age to the risks associated with feeding breastmilk substitutes or other foods.2 Can breastmilk production be increased by giving the mother additional food?

Why is the risk of death (even though it may be small if done correctly, it is MUCH greater than crib sleeping) acceptable when a completely safe alternative exists?

It still has yet to be shown that safe co-sleeping is a greater risk to infants than crib sleeping.

Especially when the research we have is very clear that, when set up properly, this option is even safer for low - risk pregnancies than a planned hospital birth.

Most people don't realize that the consensus from the research shows that homebirth is as safe as or safer than hospital birth for low - risk women with a skilled birth attendant.

Electric pads are considered safer than electric blankets, but there are some people who should not risk using an electric pad due to possible health risks.

It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when it's at the risk of your baby's health.

Also, I can think of several mechanisms by which a baby sleeping in an adult bed might come to harm, but I can't think of any obvious reason why a baby in a safe sleep space in its own bedroom (assuming that it has parents who are able to hear and responsive to its cries) should be at much greater risk than if it were on the other side of a wall in the parents» room?

Admitting that homebirth isn't as safe as you thought it was isn't the same as wishing you hadn't had the experience you had; it's just realizing that the risk was greater than you knew, and you didn't know because you weren't given the facts.

Baby shots do have some very rare risks and side effects, but they are safer than the diseases would be.

The studies do not lie, it is just as safe to birth at home than it is in the hospital for a low - risk healthy pregnancy / mother.

The effect of fan use on reduction in SIDS risk was also greater for infants who slept in the prone or side position (less safe)(AOR, 0.14; 95 % CI, 0.03 - 0.55) than for infants who slept on their backs (0.84; 0.21 - 3.39)(Table 3).