Not exact matches
Accessing these comes with huge environmental
risks and often even greater greenhouse penalties
than conventional oil.
Environmental groups say that's one of several reasons why dilbit corrodes pipelines more easily
than conventional crude
oil, although the
oil industry says dilbit poses no more
risk than other oils.
We have two main concerns: the
risk of
oil spills along the pipeline, which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, and the fact that the extraction of petroleum from the tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions
than conventional production does.
Diluted bitumen, a controversial form of heavy Canadian
oil, poses no more
risks to pipelines
than conventional oil, according to a long - awaited report released Tuesday by the National Academy of Sciences.
If the
oil industry wants to pipe these dangerous tar sands oils over our water sheds and aquifers, putting our drinking supply and neighborhoods at
risk, they should not only be required to pay into the cleanup fund, they should be paying far more
than the 8 cents per barrel they pay for
conventional oil since these tar sands oils are not just worse for the environment, but potentially pose a greater
risk of spills and are even harder to clean up.
A new study by the National Academy of Sciences found that «pipelines carrying heavy Canadian
oil sands fuel are at no greater
risk of a spill
than those running
conventional crude.»