Sentences with phrase «risk than for women»

That amounts to a 27 and 46 times higher risk than for women who didn't experience depression during their first pregnancy, the researchers said.

Not exact matches

According to the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, the benefits of using an IUD are «greater than any of the risks for women who haven't had children.»

When it comes to preparing for the long term, women face a «perfect storm» financially: They are paid less than men are on average, typically have more gaps in employment, engage in more part - time employment and are often more risk - averse investors.

Unlike a similar study last year that found that women chiefs make more than men, this one had a far larger sample and controlled for «chief executives» tenure, characteristics of the firms (size, performance and risk), and the size and independence of the boards.»

How they empower women: For more than ten years, Sudara has advocated on behalf of and empowered women who have escaped from, or at the highest risk of, human trafficking by providing dignified employment opportunities.

He says those who make arguments for God's existence are like people who point a flashlight at the sun and run the risk of ending up like the women who went to Jesus» tomb — with a living God on their hands rather than a dead one.

I am sure you did not mean to assume that women who are in shelters need formula more than you do, in fact, poor and minority women «need» it less; they are at greater risk for negative health consequences associated with formula like diabetes, obesity, heart disease, etc..

Until then, they all possess risks, and I will not throw stones at any woman for making a different choice than I did.

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology reports a three-fold increased risk of uterine rupture for women who attempt to have a VBAC with a pregnancy that began fewer than six months after the end of the last one.

reports a three-fold increased risk of uterine rupture for women who attempt to have a VBAC with a pregnancy that began fewer than six months after the end of the last one.

Several studies have shown that planned homebirth attended by a qualified experienced caregiver is as safe or safer than hospital birth for low - risk women.

Someone can deliver a live baby after two days of labour and look back and think that they didn't need a c - section and be glad they didn't get one, but if a woman has been actlively labouring for 12 hours, chances are that the risks of augmentation or a c - section are lower than the risks of waiting.

You wrote, «Every study I found said homebirth is safer for low risk woman than hospital birth.

We know it's higher than in hospital, but that is at least partly due to inadequate midwifery education and to some high risk women being considered as suitable candidates for homebirth, so it's a foregone conclusion that the stats will be bad.

As a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, and a member of ASTM International's subcommittee on standards for headgear and helmets, which is working with US Lacrosse on developing a new standard for headgear in women's lacrosse, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse players to wear helmets will make the sports safer, or, as a result of the phenomenon called risk compensation (also called the «gladiator effect»), will actually result in more, rather than fewer, head injuries.

Especially for women who have sensitive skin, or mothers with children of the same who may be a little too curious for their own good, it's easier to keep some products off the vanity altogether than risk damaging skin further.

If an early ultrasound confirms a heartbeat, the risk of miscarriage is reduced to less than 5 % for women who are 35 or under, during the first trimester.

The higher risk obstetric wards were also really lovely, with communal sitting rooms for post-partum women and the offer of iPod players, electric tealight «candles», electric oil burners, etc. the ob wards were definitely more «sterile» than the FBCs, but at the end of the day you're staying in a hospital, not a five star hotel.

Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal births of 77 %, with 35 % of women having a home birth.23 A review of care for women at low risk of complications has shown that continuity of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27 Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.

Homebirth is recognised as safe for low risk women, particularly if it is not the first time they are giving birth (i.e. slightly higher risk for primiparous women than multiparous) as per «Birth Place Study» — British Medical Journal 2011 — amongst other studies.

Obviously, that is 9 times higher than the hospital death rate for low risk women.

For healthy nulliparous women with a low risk pregnancy, the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome seems to be higher for planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric uFor healthy nulliparous women with a low risk pregnancy, the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome seems to be higher for planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric ufor planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric unit

Some breastfeeding advocates believe that the benefits of breastfeeding outweigh the risks of drinking and breastfeeding, and that women should focus on combining breastfeeding and alcohol safely, rather than aiming for abstinence, which could be unrealistic.

18 deaths in 3 years, that's 6 per year and based on the fact that homebirth rates have been rising in the past 3 years and nearly 30 % of women are opting for homebirth I'd say those stats are pretty good and far better than your risks when walking through the doors of any hospital.

Given questions about how long the vaccine is effective for, she questioned the efficacy of giving shots to girls as young as 11 years old in parts of the world (such as the U.S.) where women regularly undergo safety Pap screening repeatedly over their lifetimes, saying that the chances of their contracting cervical cancer may be less than the «small» risks associated with the vaccine.

I'm no fitness / health expert (and I can't speak to the issue of having to go on bed - rest or having a high - risk pregnancy), but here's an idea for bouncing back quickly (for us regular women): Don't gain more baby weight than medically suggested.

It seems that the rates reported in this database for low - risk pregnancies (excluding malpresentation and other factors) are all as good as or better in every category other than intrapartum death rate of babies, which I am having a hard time finding in the other literature on hospital births in the U.S. for low - risk, white women.

For low - risk women who had never given birth before, home birth led to bad outcomes (such as encephalopathy or stillbirth) slightly less than 1 % of the time.

The risk of recurrence is low, but higher than the risk for women with no previous history of molar pregnancy.

It seems there were fewer low - risk women with a preference for obstetrician - led care than we initially assumed, indicating that obstetrician - led care for low - risk women is uncommon in the Netherlands.

For the baby, instrumental delivery can increase the short - term risks of bruising, facial injury, displacement of the skull bones, and cephalohematoma (blood clot under the scalp).24 The risk of intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain) was increased in one study by more than four times for babies born by forceps compared to spontaneous birth, 25 although two studies showed no detectable developmental differences for forceps - born children at five years old.26, 27 Another study showed that when women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the force used by the clinician to deliver the baby was almost twice the force used when an epidural was not in placeFor the baby, instrumental delivery can increase the short - term risks of bruising, facial injury, displacement of the skull bones, and cephalohematoma (blood clot under the scalp).24 The risk of intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain) was increased in one study by more than four times for babies born by forceps compared to spontaneous birth, 25 although two studies showed no detectable developmental differences for forceps - born children at five years old.26, 27 Another study showed that when women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the force used by the clinician to deliver the baby was almost twice the force used when an epidural was not in placefor babies born by forceps compared to spontaneous birth, 25 although two studies showed no detectable developmental differences for forceps - born children at five years old.26, 27 Another study showed that when women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the force used by the clinician to deliver the baby was almost twice the force used when an epidural was not in placefor forceps - born children at five years old.26, 27 Another study showed that when women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the force used by the clinician to deliver the baby was almost twice the force used when an epidural was not in place.28

In this trial, which involved only women at low risk of bleeding, active management was associated with a post partum hemorrhage (blood loss greater than 500 ml) rate of 6.8 %, compared with 16.5 % for expectant (non-active) management.

On top of the risks listed above, the c - section rate for women over 40 is significantly higher than that of younger moms.

For all low risk women, bootstrapped estimates showed that planned birth in settings other than an obstetric unit was associated with cost savings and considerable stochastic uncertainty surrounding adverse perinatal outcomes.

It seems as if women are trading their low - risk status in for a nonhospital birth, and thereby actually becoming higher in risk than the general population.

The overall mortality rate for all - risk term pregnancies across the board ought to be significantly higher than the mortality rate for the «low - risk» women who decide on nonhospital birth.

For both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, women who were breastfed as children, even if only for a short time, had a 25 % lower risk of developing breast cancer than women who were bottle - fed as infanFor both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, women who were breastfed as children, even if only for a short time, had a 25 % lower risk of developing breast cancer than women who were bottle - fed as infanfor a short time, had a 25 % lower risk of developing breast cancer than women who were bottle - fed as infants.

The study did not compare the relative safety of home births against low - risk women who opted for doctor rather than midwife - led care.

Most people don't realize that the consensus from the research shows that homebirth is as safe as or safer than hospital birth for low - risk women with a skilled birth attendant.

Attempting a home birth also is not advised for women who are post-term (greater than 42 weeks gestation), carrying twins, or have a breech presentation because all carry a greater risk of perinatal death.

Postpartum affective disorder (AD), including postpartum depression (PPD), affects more than one in two hundred women with no history of prior psychiatric episodes, and raises the risk of later affective disorder for those women, according to a new study published in PLOS Medicine by Marie - Louise Rasmussen from Statens Serum Institut, Denmark, and colleagues.

It is acknowledged that hospitals tend to be optimised for high - risk women — with technology and staffing for close monitoring and quick access to interventions, and for low - risk women — staff monitor and tend to intervene more than is necessary [33].

One paper in Britain claims that for a select group of very low risk women who have had at least one successful vaginal delivery home birth is no more dangerous than hospital birth.

The perinatal mortality rate for low risk women cared for by midwives is higher than the perinatal mortality rate for high risk women care for by obstetricians!

To refute this obvious mistruth, she is pointing out what the science actually says — that the perinatal mortality rate for low risk women cared for by midwives, whether at home or at hospital, is higher than the perinatal mortality rate for high risk women cared for by obstetricians in the hospital.

Therefore, the restriction of white women only makes the input population closer to that of the MANA data, even though it is not exactly the same, i.e. the survival for a group that is 92 % low risk is going to look more like the survival for a group that is 100 % low risk than for a group that is 50 - 75 % low risk.

The truly shocking thing about homebirth is that even when you include malpractice and negligence in the hospital statistics, homebirth STILL has a death rate that is 450 % higher than hospital birth for comparable risk women.

All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low - risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to high - risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low - risk healthy white women), the infant death rate is actually 6.14 per 1000, which is «300 % higher death rate than at - home births!»

Once pregnant, you will have a higher risk for hypertension and high blood pressure, and developing gestational diabetes is more common for women in your age range than younger moms - to - be.

Women who are expecting or are within two years postpartum are at higher risk for a behavioral health issue than any other time in their life.