Of course, stock market investing comes with more
risk than a safe, low - yield savings account does.
Of course, stock market investing comes with more
risk than a safe, low - yield savings account.
Not exact matches
Risk - takers tend to be more successful
than those who like to play it
safe.
LUSARDI: Question three has to do about
risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a
safer return
than a stock mutual fund.»
The company isn't afraid to take
risks, which means that it's going to sometimes strike out, but it's also much more likely to hit an occasional home run
than companies that are less innovative and play it too
safe.
Again, when
risk - aversion kicks in during the completion of a market cycle, central bank liquidity does not reliably support stocks, because
safe liquidity is seen as a desirable asset rather
than an inferior one.
Using cryptocurrency, is also extremely
safer than real currency, as cryptocurrency, is 100 percent digital, so it eliminates the
risks of being stolen in robberies or other relating crime that occurs in these countries.
Elsewhere the Japanese Yen slipped 0.06 % to ¥ 109.11 against the Dollar at the time of writing, easing geo - political
risk and better
than expected PMI numbers out of China supporting market
risk appetite through the session, leading to a pullback in demand for the
safe havens.
You're doubling down on the
risks like that, as currently there are no
safe investments that are guaranteed to return more
than the mortgage rate for 25 years.
As was recently communicated by more
than 80 prominent Canadian business leaders, organizations and communities, the global reputation of our country as a
safe and secure place to invest and do business is at serious
risk.
The reason is that when investors are inclined toward
risk - aversion,
safe liquidity is a desirable asset rather
than an inferior one, so creating more of the stuff doesn't provoke speculation.
Churches would rather do something
safe like a barn dance or a pie - and - pea supper or another barn dance because the first one went so well, rather
than risk something as socially volatile as a comedy night as part of their outreach.
Why should they question whether a person who wishes to have an undesired fetus that will feed off the host body and cause pain, distension, and medical
risk be removed through a process that is known to be fully effective and
safer than waiting until it reaches a stage where it is expelled.
Being «
safe rather
than sorry» is a completely selfish motivation then, and I'd rather live my life unselfishly and
risk the remote chance of hell
than choose to accept beliefs that I can't justify in our modern society, some of which actually hurt others, just to save my butt.
Too many players being paid more
than they are worth and this rebuild should aim to resolve that, cut out some now and force the rest to step up, without a rebuild then they are
safer as they do not see any
risk to not giving 110 % each day like Alexis does.
New Jaguars general manager David Caldwell may opt for the
safe pick in Fisher rather
than gambling on a high
risk game - changer.
I realise the own goal got people talking, but I prefer to play with courage and throw myself in there with the
risk of getting an unlucky own goal rather
than just playing it
safe.
But, as a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse and field hockey players to wear helmets will make the sports
safer, or, as a result of the phenomenon called
risk compensation, actually result in more, rather
than fewer, head injuries.
Several studies have shown that planned homebirth attended by a qualified experienced caregiver is as
safe or
safer than hospital birth for low -
risk women.
I have always believed in my gut that it is
safer to have a CNM attend a homebirth in a low
risk pregnancy
than give birth in a hospital.
Rather
than placing additional soft materials into a crib that can pose a suffocation
risk, baby stays nice and warm as well as
safe.
You wrote, «Every study I found said homebirth is
safer for low
risk woman
than hospital birth.
I'm sorry, but the OliverB bumpers still look dangerous: all those ties and the width of the bumper is greater
than the width of the space from the tip of a baby's nose to the span of her mouth, which is how you would mesure
risk of suffocation and that would mean suffocation could still occur, so they are not that much
safer: -LRB-
The Canadian study has an unusual way of calculating perinatal mortality, and the Dutch study points out that homebirth is as
safe as hospital birth in the Netherlands without addressing the fact that the homebirth population is much lower
risk than the hospital population.
As a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, and a member of ASTM International's subcommittee on standards for headgear and helmets, which is working with US Lacrosse on developing a new standard for headgear in women's lacrosse, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse players to wear helmets will make the sports
safer, or, as a result of the phenomenon called
risk compensation (also called the «gladiator effect»), will actually result in more, rather
than fewer, head injuries.
But, as a former college lacrosse and high school field hockey player, I have reservations about whether requiring female lacrosse and field hockey players to wear helmets will make the sports
safer, or, as a result of
risk compensation, actually result in more, rather
than fewer, head injuries.
This may seem a little on the cool side, but babies are far
safer being slightly cool
than being at the
risk of overheating.
Even if circumcision is proven to slightly lower the
risk of acquiring an STD in the future,
safe sexual practices (abstinence, fidelity and condoms) are more important and has more to do with preventing STDs
than circumcision.
Homebirth is recognised as
safe for low
risk women, particularly if it is not the first time they are giving birth (i.e. slightly higher
risk for primiparous women
than multiparous) as per «Birth Place Study» — British Medical Journal 2011 — amongst other studies.
But it wasn't
safer than a hospital birth, at least not if the definition of safety is was your baby more at
risk of dying because she was born at home.
How can you trust that homebirth is
safe when the most comprehensive study ever done of homebirth (and analyzed by a midwife) found that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED midwife has a death rate approximately 800 % higher
than comparable
risk hospital birth, and even MANA can't figure out how to criticize it?
The research in fact shows that in some cases home is
safer for low
risk mothers
than hospital.
10) In a low -
risk pregnancy attended by an experienced practitioner a home birth is just as
safe (or
safer)
than the alternatives, and can be a really beautiful experience!
The results offer support to the concept that home birth for low -
risk pregnancies is not necessarily less
safe than conventional, hospital - based deliveries.
They didn't want to publish the results, but they were pressured into it, and are now trying to convince people that a death rate more
than 5.5 X higher
than comparable
risk hospital birth is «
safe.»
Lower estimations of how many people safely bedsharing in our population significantly makes crib sleeping look much, much
safer than bedsharing because parents are not afraid to say that their babies sleep in cribs; but many who bedshare and their babies live, and are not therefore counted in relative
risks of crib vs. bedsharing statistics.
Indeed, the rhetoric is nothing less
than threatening, of any and all bedsharing parents even when
risks are minimized; and the zeal and imprecise language which is being used by many technicians involved in what is considered «
safe infant sleep» campaigns is over simplified to the point that it is inaccurate, misleading, and inappropriate, and is itself dangerous on many different levels, both politically and scientifically (see Gettler and McKenna 2010 available on this website).
But I think pumping and dumping is much
safer than taking any
risks with medications.
When the breastfeeding mother is under - nourished, it is
safer, easier, and less expensive to give her more food
than to expose an infant under six months of age to the
risks associated with feeding breastmilk substitutes or other foods.2 Can breastmilk production be increased by giving the mother additional food?
Why is the
risk of death (even though it may be small if done correctly, it is MUCH greater
than crib sleeping) acceptable when a completely
safe alternative exists?
It still has yet to be shown that
safe co-sleeping is a greater
risk to infants
than crib sleeping.
Especially when the research we have is very clear that, when set up properly, this option is even
safer for low -
risk pregnancies
than a planned hospital birth.
Most people don't realize that the consensus from the research shows that homebirth is as
safe as or
safer than hospital birth for low -
risk women with a skilled birth attendant.
Electric pads are considered
safer than electric blankets, but there are some people who should not
risk using an electric pad due to possible health
risks.
It's better to be
safe than sorry, especially when it's at the
risk of your baby's health.
Also, I can think of several mechanisms by which a baby sleeping in an adult bed might come to harm, but I can't think of any obvious reason why a baby in a
safe sleep space in its own bedroom (assuming that it has parents who are able to hear and responsive to its cries) should be at much greater
risk than if it were on the other side of a wall in the parents» room?
Admitting that homebirth isn't as
safe as you thought it was isn't the same as wishing you hadn't had the experience you had; it's just realizing that the
risk was greater
than you knew, and you didn't know because you weren't given the facts.
Baby shots do have some very rare
risks and side effects, but they are
safer than the diseases would be.
The studies do not lie, it is just as
safe to birth at home
than it is in the hospital for a low -
risk healthy pregnancy / mother.
The effect of fan use on reduction in SIDS
risk was also greater for infants who slept in the prone or side position (less
safe)(AOR, 0.14; 95 % CI, 0.03 - 0.55)
than for infants who slept on their backs (0.84; 0.21 - 3.39)(Table 3).