Over the long term, companies that can consistently and reliably increase dividends paid to investors offer higher returns with less
risk than companies that do not pay a dividend, or which do not consistently increase dividends paid to investors.
It's something that presents more
risk than the company is willing to take on for a particular type of policy.
It's something that presents more
risk than the company is willing to take on for a particular type of policy.
Not exact matches
The thing is, our
companies are
risk - averse — 13 % more so
than American ones, according to a recent Deloitte study.
«We found that entrepreneurs who quit their jobs to found
companies did have higher
risk tolerance
than those who remained employed.
With space ventures typically defined as high
risk, high reward investments, Space Angels found the
companies attract valuations many times greater
than a typical technology start - up.
These
risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways
than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the
company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the
company's products or an increase in the
company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the
company's products; the
company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those
risks and uncertainties described under the heading «
Risk Factors» in the
company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the
company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
But the
risk is more
than worth it for early - stage
companies seeking to build an agile business and infrastructure.
Connor says that smaller
companies could draft a code themselves, especially if they are in a low -
risk, low - liability field, and Fraedrich similarly advises that if you have more
than 20 employees, it's time to consult an ethicist or human resources specialist.
More
than a quarter (27.3 percent) of council members responding to a quarterly poll say U.S. trade policy is now the biggest
risk their
company faces.
Although European investors have, historically, been more
risk - averse
than Americans, that perception may be changing as more high - profile
companies see successful exits, and their founders reinvest in the local startup ecosystem.
She has more
than 20 years of experience advising Fortune 500
companies on significant corporate transactions, governance matters, securities, compliance,
risk management, audit, and litigation matters.
Investors without private market exposure are also running meaningful concentration
risk, not just in terms of the number of public
companies (less
than 4,000) relative to private
companies (more
than 6 million), but because publicly traded
companies are now more highly concentrated within certain industries as a result of strategic M&A.
This means that as a franchisor, not only do you need far less capital with which to expand, but your
risk is largely limited to the capital you invest in developing your franchise
company — an amount that is often less
than the cost of opening one additional
company - owned location.
One reason is that small
companies are leaner
than large
companies, so huge cost curtailment
risks cutting beyond fat and into muscle.
TriLinc looks for established social enterprises in stable emerging markets that are ripe for growth capital and represent a lower
risk than early - stage
companies.
Just 5 % cited foreign - exchange fluctuations as a
risk inherent in operating outside Canada, he notes, yet among the 500
companies engaged with foreign customers and suppliers, this was the largest single concern, mentioned by more
than a third of respondents.
We believe the Statoil acquisition strengthens the
company's business
risk profile by adding an established, profitable c - store and fuel retailer with a strong market share of more
than 30 % in the mature markets of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark with good growth prospects in riskier, more fragmented Eastern Europe.
Beyond then, we expect the
company to sustain credit measures that are consistent with its intermediate financial
risk profile, characterized by fully adjusted debt to EBITDA of 2.5x - 3.0 x, funds from operations to debt of more
than 25 %, and EBITDA interest coverage of more
than 5.0 x.
«I found it to be a bigger challenge to deal with the constraints of a holding
company than having some
risk and knowing we can deliver on it,» he says.
With Fox selling ad space at more
than $ 5 million for each 30 - second spot,
companies seeking brand visibility on the world's largest stage are
risking an expensive disappointment if their commercials fall flat.
Cramer argues that United Rentals, a largely domestic construction equipment
company, has better end markets and lower investment
risk than Caterpillar.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the
Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the
Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the
Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements
than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the
Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market
risks that may affect the
Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Moreover, the possibility that the
Company might sell Wynn Boston Harbor for less
than its full long - term value in an attempt to «mitigate
risk» by limiting the investigation is of even greater concern.
Tyler Lessard also quit last year as RIM's vice-president of BlackBerry Global Alliances and is now the chief marketing officer at Fixmo Inc. in Toronto, a mobile
risk management
company that attracted more
than $ 23 million in funding last year.
The inherent
risk with such acquisitions is that the parent
company swallows up the scrappy upstart into what food industry veteran Alan Murray calls «the machine» — a hidebound, groupthink corporate enterprise — rather
than learning from its entrepreneurial culture.
A California
company called Dexcom connected a continuous glucose monitor (a device that had been around for more
than a decade) wirelessly to a smartphone (or smart watch), allowing the user to read, plot, and share blood sugar levels with anyone, at five - minute intervals, all day long — and sending an alert when patients were at
risk.
It is not in the best interest of a
company to pay their employees less
than fair value and
risk creating high turnover.
«Show me a
company with more
than 10 percent of its business with one customer or more
than half of its business in one industry and I'll show you a
company at
risk of being impacted by one
company or one industry,» says Paul Weber, CEO of Entrepreneur Advertising Group in Kansas City, Missouri.
But here's a caveat: if you're the owner of a growing
company that has unpredictable cash - flow patterns and sometimes - insatiable capital needs, the
risks of a volatile stock market may be more
than you can handle right now.
Mr. Janashvili brings to Rose &
Company more
than 20 years of experience helping
companies develop their brands, manage reputational
risk and respond to crises.
Courageous
companies invest in R&D and offer incentives to employees who take chances, rather
than punishing calculated
risks that lead to failure.
LUSARDI: Question three has to do about
risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single
company stock usually provides a safer return
than a stock mutual fund.»
For instance, a Windows desktop exploit presents a higher
risk than an FTP server exploit for most
companies just because the FTP server may be used infrequently.
As I will discuss, the
risk of distortion and inaccuracy is amplified because start - up
companies, even quite mature ones, often have far less robust internal controls and governance procedures
than most public
companies.
For example, the expected timing and likelihood of completion of the proposed merger, including the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any required governmental and regulatory approvals of the proposed merger that could reduce anticipated benefits or cause the parties to abandon the transaction, the ability to successfully integrate the businesses, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement, the possibility that Kraft shareholders may not approve the merger agreement, the
risk that the parties may not be able to satisfy the conditions to the proposed transaction in a timely manner or at all,
risks related to disruption of management time from ongoing business operations due to the proposed transaction, the
risk that any announcements relating to the proposed transaction could have adverse effects on the market price of Kraft's common stock, and the
risk that the proposed transaction and its announcement could have an adverse effect on the ability of Kraft and Heinz to retain customers and retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with their suppliers and customers and on their operating results and businesses generally, problems may arise in successfully integrating the businesses of the
companies, which may result in the combined
company not operating as effectively and efficiently as expected, the combined
company may be unable to achieve cost - cutting synergies or it may take longer
than expected to achieve those synergies, and other factors.
The logic being that the current investors and founders have more inside knowledge of the
company performance and dynamics
than a brand new investor and thus if the new investor is going to «pay up» they shouldn't take all of the pricing
risk in the deal.
Research suggests businesswomen are not only more wary of
risk than men but that
companies with women at the top are more successful and in tune with their customers because their boards have a wider range of views.
Two issues with them: they are more micro
than macro and they have more
company - specific
risk than the wood block ETFs.
Because the Fund may invest its assets in
companies in a specific region, including Europe, it is subject to greater
risks of adverse developments in that region and / or the surrounding regions
than a fund that is more broadly diversified geographically.
But Gleb Polyakov and Igor Zamlinsky, two young entrepreneurs from Atlanta who are trying to create a full - blown
company around a $ 400 barista - grade home espresso machine, say that
risk is no different
than for traditional small businesses.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment
companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment
companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance
companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more
than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other
risk reduction strategy.
If pre-product, pre-revenue
companies (i.e. loss making, just idea stage) can be valued for $ 10 — $ 20 million, why can't Financial Samurai, which is highly profitable, has six years of existence, can pay a nice dividend if it wants to, has way less
risk than all these new startups, and can grow revenue by triple digits every year with promotion, be worth a similar range?
Similar to D&B, Experian captures information about your business» background,
company financial information, credit score and
risk factors, banking, trade, and collection history, liens judgments, bankruptcies, and your industry to create a 100 - point ranking for your business (but the data is weighted and scored differently
than the PAYDEX score).
A
company with negative working capital (more liabilities
than assets) is generally seen as being in financial
risk for increased debt (which may lead to bankruptcy).
It's tough to overstate how much analysts turned on the
company, and Xiaomi ran its operations on loans rather
than seek more venture capital, which might have
risked cutting its value.
Investments in smaller
companies may involve greater
risks than those in larger, more well - known
companies.
It, however, did include the requirement for
companies to use boilerplate consumer protection and transaction receipt clauses as well as the ability for low or no
risk companies operating with less
than $ 1,000,000 in outstanding obligations to pay a $ 500 application fee for a two - year provisional license that can then be renewed.
And, since the process began,
companies have cut investment spending each quarter by more
than we expected, so this has been framed as a downside
risk.
«It's a very unusual thing to do, because the insurance
company would have deeper pockets
than Gawker,»
risk management consultant Larry Geneen told the Times.