Sentences with phrase «riskier than a money»

Frankly, if you will need the money in one year I wouldn't touch anything riskier than a money market account.

But under certain conditions, they may be riskier than money market accounts.

Not exact matches

Expansion is a risky business endeavor that requires more time, money, and energy than your current enterprise, but once a business reaches a certain capacity, there are only two options: grow or die.

Investing in companies whose core technology is open - source is definitely more risky than plowing money into a business with proprietary technology.

Start - ups won't be less risky because money is more available — quite the contrary — and so more than a few mom - and - pop investors are going to lose their shirts in crowdfunded start - ups.

While it's better to invest than keep money under a mattress, buying risk free securities, such as guaranteed income certificates or low - yielding government bonds, could actually be riskier than purchasing higher returning products, says Ted Rechtshaffen, president and CEO of Toronto's TriDelta Financial Partners.

Previously, only accredited investors — wealthy people with an annual income of more than $ 200,000 or a net worth of at least $ 1 million — were allowed to put money into such risky ventures.

If a home loan is more expensive than that limit, it is considered riskier for the lender as more money is at stake.

Mr. Buffett is a forensic analyst of companies rather than trends, and he usually opts for what he perceives to be strong, undervalued brands rather than putting his money into fast - growing, innovative — and risky — firms.

I have less than 5 % of my money in this; my wife wouldn't let me go in with any more (too risky she says).

Stein thinks the bank loan funds are more risky than people realize because a person might try to get money out of a fund and have difficulty.

We believe in long - term investing, but we don't want to put ourselves in a situation where we take more risk than necessary by having money slated for short - term goals in riskier investments.

Similarly important are the returns that bond investors are willing to accept in financing governments, which is generally seen as a less risky proposition than loaning money to commerce.

Losses in risky assets will dissipate investor confidence, undermine economic activity, and leave the Fed with little choice other than to step on the accelerator for more easy money.

Also, putting a large amount of your money into a single investment — like a house — could be riskier than spreading your savings out across a portfolio of investments.

Historically, over long periods of time, money invested in riskier assets such as stocks has generally rewarded investors with higher returns than funds invested in ultra safe and liquid assets.

It is also clearly less risky than everyone randomly investing their money.

That's less than the 12.2 percent the city could have earned — another $ 1.9 billion — if it invested the money in reliable, low - cost S&P 500 Index and Core Bond funds and avoided risky, expensive hedge funds, private equity and real - estate investments.

Investors aren't just investing more money than they were earlier in the year; they're investing a lot more money in riskier, earlier - stage companies.

Another option, though may be not as safe as CDs or money market accounts, is high quality dividend paying stocks (always understand that investing in the stock market is riskier than putting money in bank accounts), some with more than 5 % dividend yield at the end of 2010.

Callable bonds are more risky for investors than non-callable bonds because an investor whose bond has been called is often faced with reinvesting the money at a lower, less attractive rate.

If our model predicts a higher loss potential than you have specified for your portfolio, we will execute a reallocation from a riskier asset class (such as stocks) into a lower risk asset class (such as government bonds or money market funds).

Wary investors opened accounts to stash the money they pulled out of riskier products, while others decided the freedom of a TFSA was better than the uncertainty of a standard mutual fund investment.

Lending to you is less risky to some lenders than loaning money to someone with slightly damaged credit.

Although money market funds traditionally hold their value at a share price of $ 1, there's no guarantee that the principal value won't deviate from $ 1, which makes the MMF riskier than the comparable bank and brokerage account products.

With this on - going recession and low bank interest rates, I would rather pay my house which I have rented out than put my money in risky investments.

These DTI requirements often mean that low - income buyers don't qualify for enough money to purchase a home, or that DTIs are higher than the recommended limits, making their loans riskier.

At base, an absolute value discipline holds that you should not put money into risky assets unless you're being more than compensated for those risks.

Historically, over long periods of time, money invested in riskier assets such as stocks has generally rewarded investors with higher returns than funds invested in ultra safe and liquid assets.

And since they have been seen as only marginally riskier than insured money - market accounts, their popularity soared.

Is it risky to trade your money, do better than the market, and protect yourself during recessions?

@Roger, I argue that bonds are more risky than stocks today as they are almost guaranteed to lose you money over the next few years.

Stocks Better than Bonds in the Long Run Bonds, which are often seen as «safe» by investors who have never invested in the stock market, or those who have lost a lot of money in stocks, are «risky» in the long run owing to the inability of their returns (interest) to beat inflation.

Investing is more risky than just stashing your money in the bank, but it can pay off handsomely as well.

For a person who is very risk averse but wants to make a little more money than the risk - free rate, the solution is not to invest completely in slightly risky things.

This is on top of the problem that when high - quality long interest rates are so low, it is typically a bad time to try to make money in financial assets, because returns on risky assets are typically only 0 - 2 % percent higher than the yield on long BBB / Baa debt over the long run.

There is also good data about buying when the market is as low as it is (which could be negative as in example # 1), but if you're a newbie to that, I would still suggest paying off the CC first (a good 20 % return on the money, to your pocket and not to the CC company's) rather than entering into a volatile (read risky) market that you do not understand.

In a recent article in the online Wall Street Journal titled «Why Stocks Are Riskier Than You Think», by Drs. Zvi Bodie and Rachelle Taqqu, I found a welcome respite from the money managers» self - serving drumbeat.

Many people see them as less risky than some other investments, but you can still lose money.

Diversifying your assets is generally less risky than concentrating your money in one asset or asset class.

While debt consolidation might not save you as much money, it can keep your credit score in tact and is less risky than debt settlement or bankruptcy.

Here, the idea was to test whether people understood that a stock mutual fund contains many stocks and that investing in a large group of stocks is generally less risky than putting all one's money into a the stock of a single company.

The bottom line: If you have money that you will need to spend in the next five years, you probably shouldn't own anything riskier than short - term bonds.

This is your debt to credit ratio, and if you have used all of the credit available to you, lenders consider you riskier than someone who has managed their money better and kept their debt low in relation to how much they could be spending.

Putting too much money in «safe» assets such as bonds and cash equivalents may be riskier than you think.

While the benefit might give you peace of mind, it's not necessarily the best benefit if the money you're receiving ends up being less than what you could get from other, albeit riskier, investment.

Some investments are riskier than others — there's a greater chance you could lose some or all of your money.

Frankly, this is probably less risky than putting money into a stock index fund.

When you routinely make risky investments with the anticipation of a quick payoff, you may be gambling with your money, rather than investing for the long term.

The safest investment is probably a money market fund [originally I said a TIPS fund but they appear to be riskier than I had thought].