Emerging markets tend to be
riskier than developed markets, but can also Read more -LSB-...]
Emerging markets tend to be
riskier than developed markets, but can also offer diversification opportunities.
Are emerging markets really very much more
risky than developed markets?
Not exact matches
Developing and
marketing custom products is a
riskier, more capital - intensive business
than simply importing and exporting produce.
For example, going the ETF route to invest in emerging
markets is still
riskier than investing in
developed markets.
It's far less
risky and expensive for to come up with new variations on Oreos
than develop and
market a wholly new cookie.
Stocks of companies in emerging
markets are generally more
risky than stocks of companies in
developed countries.
For a value stock to turn profitable, the
market must alter its perception of the company, which is considered
riskier than a growth entity
developing.
Emerging
markets have higher long - term expected growth rates
than developed markets, and they are more
risky.
In
markets for government debt, favoring the a priori safe bet of high - debt - issuer countries, such as the United States, Japan, and
developed European nations, can be far
riskier to an investor's wealth
than interest - rate volatility or credit ratings may suggest.
Just as is the case in
developed markets,
riskier small and value stocks produce higher returns
than large - cap stocks over the long term.
The iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF provides exposure to bond issues across several emerging
markets — a
riskier proposition on its face
than investing in
developed countries with better credit ratings, which helps explain the high yield.
Emerging economies might offer greater growth potential
than advanced economies, but the stocks of companies located in emerging
markets could be substantially more volatile,
risky, and less liquid
than the stocks of companies located in more
developed foreign
markets.