Sentences with phrase «risking higher interest payments»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

Those federal rules, which double down on restrictions adopted in 2014 and stern warnings to lenders issued by OSFI earlier this summer, require banks to qualify borrowers at higher interest rates, impose additional limits on mortgages for buyers with small down payments, and compel financial institutions to share the risk by taking out insurance policies on low - ratio mortgages.

Students who rack up a large amount of debt and begin their careers in an entry - level position can be particularly at risk, especially if they owe larger monthly payments on high - interest debt, such as private student loans.

Equity correlation risk The perception that high yield issuers may have trouble generating sufficient cash flow to make interest payments could make them behave like equities.

The higher the risk of a default or late payment, the higher the interest rate will be.

In exchange for their credit risk, these loans offer high interest payments that typically float above a common short - term benchmark such as the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR.

By loaning money to a company with lower credit quality, investors face a higher risk of not receiving all of the promised interest and principal payments.

For younger students, who do not have sufficient credit history, monthly payments on private student loans could be hardly bearable, as the interest rate set by lenders is typically very high to offset potential risk of default.

Borrowers who fail to cease using their high interest cards after consolidation run the risk of falling even deeper in debt - because they now have both a loan consolidation payment and a credit card balance to pay on each month.

The lower tranches will carry a greater risk, maybe even a risk greater than the typical MBS, and thus, will get a higher but less secure interest payment.

You may also risk a higher interest rate of 29.49 % as a penalty rate if you make a late or returned payment.

Generally speaking, a better credit history will result in a lower interest rate on the loan, whereas a credit history with past due payments, previous defaults, and collections will often lead to a higher interest rat, to offset the lender's increased risk in offering credit to a borrower with poor credit.

At the other end, high - yield bonds pay a higher interest rate than Treasury securities, but there's a substantial risk that the issuer won't be able to keep up with payments or pay back your principal.

Obviously, the interest rates and payments are often higher to cover the risk.

Other risks include rising interest rates, which could mean higher mortgage payments, and, if you're paying down the mortgage on the new home out of current earnings, job loss or disability.

Against the advantage of the lower payment at the beginning of the loan, you should weigh the risk that an increase in interest rates will lead to higher monthly payments in the future.

This high risk comes at a cost, usually in the form of a higher interest rate and a higher monthly payment.

On the other hand, there is a risk that if interest rates go up, the price of homes will go down as people won't be able to afford as much because their monthly payments will be higher.

While delinquencies incur late payment fees, cardholders who go into default may find that they're unable to get credit cards, and if they can, the interest rate on them is usually very high, since card issuers will deem them a risk.

As with any other investment decisions, deciding to risk a potentially higher future interest rate in order to get a lower rate (and payment) today is risky considering the current financial climate.

There are inevitably some high - risk lenders who exist and are willing to take a chance on what is considered a risky mortgage loan, but the interest rates will reflect this by being much higher; therefore the monthly payment may be more than what is realistically affordable.

These risks largely center on affordability: a person must be able to stop making new credit card purchases, and must be able to pay more than the minimum payment on the new card, or else they risk many years of very high interest rates.

Factors that put you at risk are making an occasional late payment, living in a high foreclosure area, and / or carrying risky debts such as an interest - only mortgage.

You run the risk of high - interest rates, high down payment requirements, and shorter terms.

These borrowers are associated with a higher risk of defaulting on their loan payments or on the loan as a whole, and to offset that risk they will be charged much higher interest rates than traditional mortgages.

You have to weigh the risk that an increase in interest rates could lead to higher monthly payments in the future against the disadvantages.

By the way, these were the high - risk loans given to «subprime» borrowers who did not qualify for the best interest rates (because of bad credit, no down payment, etc.).

And in arguing for risk free income they're essentially asking for a handout from the US government in the form of higher interest payments from Uncle Sam.

The reasoning behind this is that a loan with a 5 % down payment is considered high - risk, and they'll cover that risk by raising the interest rate accordingly.

Lenders generally want larger down payments and charge higher interest for these loans since they are considered risker than conventional loans.

There is a risk of a higher interest rate, up to 29.99 percent, when you miss a payment or have a returned payment.

If you are late with your payments several times over the course of the payment period, you run the risk of having an interest rate that is much higher than what was originally computed for you.

It is important to understand that these products carry very high interest rates and thus, if you pay only the minimum payments on your balances, not only you will spend a lot of money on interests but you will risk accumulating too much debt and endangering your finances.

In fact, with a housing crisis still rampant many homeowners with high cost monthly mortgage payments that don't have credit or mortgage life insurance protection may be putting their families at risk for bankruptcy or years of interest payments on a home loan they can't afford.

Against these advantages, you have to weigh the risk that an increase in interest rates would lead to higher monthly payments in the future.

Refinancing your ARM may increase your monthly payments, but at least you can eliminate the risk of high interest rates in the future.

In addition, compared to short - term debt, an intermediate - term debt carries greater risk that higher inflation could erode the value of expected interest payments.

As with other investments, higher risk means higher return in the form of higher interest payments during the life of the bond.

Higher Interest Rates - Down payment helps lenders to determine risk.

By not refinancing your loans, you risk throwing significant amounts of money away on interest and higher monthly payments.

So why don't lenders offer a true reverse mortage which would compute and lend a stream of payments (at interest of course, but hopefully a rate reflective of the low risk given the high property value / loan ratio) rather than a useless lump sum which has seniors paying pretty high mortgage interest rates on a large amount of loan, rather than a interest on the (rising) amount of loan as the stream of payments accumulated.

A lower risk alternative to the HELOC approach would be to look for a high - yield checking account so that you can be earning interest on your checking balance (and use other methods to make extra principal payments).

Because there is almost no risk of default by the government, the return on Treasury bonds is relatively low, and a high inflation rate can erase most of the gains by reducing the value of the principal and interest payments.

The QRM rule encourages borrowers to make down payments greater than the current average in order to avoid risk retention requirements that amount to significantly higher interest rates.

Fluctuating rates pose a significant risk to your monthly expenses after the initial period expires and you will incur higher payments not necessarily towards the principal but interest itself.