Sentences with phrase «risks against the costs»

Not exact matches

The ranking was based on five factors: Tier 1 capital compared with risk - weighted assets; nonperforming assets against total assets; loan - loss reserves to nonperforming assets; deposits to funding; and efficiency, a measure of costs to revenue.

Wearables thus have two big minuses working against them: they run the risk of being redundant devices and they cost extra.

If I am wrong in either exaggerating the risks of recession or understating the efficacy of policy, the costs of taking out insurance against a recession that can not be met with monetary policy are relatively low.

We live with considerable uncertainty about the sustainability of the pattern of relatively low risk premia and reduction in the cost of insurance against future macroeconomic and financial volatility.

«It all comes down to balancing your risk over your intellectual property against the cost of developing on your own.»

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

Its hard though when the owner is against winning titles because the risk and costs involved in mounting a serious campaign are seen to be too high.

«This bill is a targeted assault against our values, punishing New Yorkers because we support women's reproductive rights and including the Collins / Faso amendment which would devastate the state's health care industry, put millions of New Yorkers at risk, and increase the total cost of this bill on New York to $ 6.9 billion,» Cuomo said.

This bill is a targeted assault against our values, punishing New Yorkers because we support women's reproductive rights and including the Collins / Faso amendment which would devastate the state's health care industry, put millions of New Yorkers at risk, and increase the total cost of this bill on New York to $ 6.9 billion.»

«I'm not categorically against all human germ - line editing,» Doudna says, «but I think there would need to be a reason to do it that would justify the risks and costs.»

Individuals who successfully balance the benefits of risk avoidance against energy costs (missed opportunities to eat) have a greater chance of survival.

Many other animals make these sorts of judgements, balancing the risk of being eaten against the cost of having to run away, which might mean losing out on a food source or a chance to mate.

The authors of this new research paper analysed data and models from the USEPA's updated global non-CO2 GHG mitigation assessment to investigate the potential for GHG reductions from agricultural emissions from seven regions globally, offsetting costs against social benefit of GHG mitigation (e.g. human health, flood risk and energy costs).

But Illaris is a canakinumab drug injected every three months that would cost $ 64,000 per year with a potential risk of lowered immunity against infectious disease.

In summary, it is about striking the right balance by keeping risksunder control and judging the risk of doing something against the cost of not doing it.

Remember, good health and safety management is not about eliminating risks completely and banning activities, it is about striking the right balance — keeping risks within tolerable bounds, spending enough to make things safe enough, including judging the risk of doing something against the cost of not doing it.

This is where schools have to strike the right balance between keeping risks under control «so far as is reasonably practicable» and judging the risk of doing something against the cost of not doing it, while taking into account the health and safety of employees and anyone else affected by a school's actions.

Whenever any civil action has been brought against any officer of the Florida College System institution board of trustees, including a board member, or any person employed by or agent of the Florida College System institution board of trustees, of any Florida College System institution for any act or omission arising out of and in the course of the performance of his or her duties and responsibilities, the Florida College System institution board of trustees may defray all costs of defending such action, including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses together with costs of appeal, if any, and may save harmless and protect such person from any financial loss resulting therefrom; and the Florida College System institution board of trustees may be self - insured, to enter into risk management programs, or to purchase insurance for whatever coverage it may choose, or to have any combination thereof, to cover all such losses and expenses.

Traditional publishers assume all the risk; they pay the writer an advance against royalties and cover all the costs of marketing.

The risk of significant legal costs is quite substantial if a claim is brought against you, and having your policy cover the defense can be the difference between an easy fix and bankruptcy!

Your policy protects you from these risks, as well as from the costs of defending against a claim or lawsuit for something covered by the policy.

Boomers must find a strategy that best balances the risk of outliving their wealth against the cost of unnecessarily restricting their consumption.

With personal property coverage, you're protected against risks like fire, theft, and vandalism and you know you'll be able to replace the property if it suffers a loss because policies come standard with replacement cost coverage

Most families don't have a few thousand in extra cash lying around, especially after a significant loss, so this is one more way to indemnify yourself against risks that can cost you money.

In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it

This is a much more efficient, cost - effective way of Protecting a Portfolio Against Systematic Risk and is rather unique to Swan's DRS.

² Likewise, the investor who wanted to be protected against purchasing power risk would be 100 % stocks since corporations earn cash flows by selling goods and services at a mark - up over the cost of production.

Liability coverage on your renters insurance protects you against those risks and many others, as well as paying your defense costs.

You're paying to insure against a risk to your own wallet, namely the cost of medical treatment.

You must weigh the cost of the insurance against the default risk.

Of course, any advantage offered by an RRSP mortgage should be weighed against the costs and risks involved.

It would have been much better to focus reform on the high cost of health care than requiring everyone to indemnify against a risk for which they may not deem insurance necessary.

If you want an even safer alternative, splitting your retirement savings between an annuity and a low - cost balanced portfolio, such as the MoneySense Global Couch Potato strategy, can increase your protection against longevity risk.

Fair - value accounting assumes that broader market risks — like another recession or financial instability — carry a cost that counts against revenue.

It will almost certainly involve paying a fee and also has a small risk of having costs awarded against you.

Read the terms and conditions carefully, consider the fees, and weigh up the costs and risks of these products against the benefits they provide.

Just because you are with a claims handler, even a no win no fee, it is unlikely to mitigate the risks of claiming — in other words that you can lose your fee and if you're not in the small claims track there is a potential to have costs awarded against you.

I wonder if anyone has thoughts about using forex to put up a crude hedge against currency risk for a fairly low cost.

The debate, in a nutshell, goes something like this: Why pay higher fees for an actively managed fund that has a shot at posting much bigger returns than the index it's measured against but which also runs the risk of posting smaller returns, when you can buy a low - cost index fund, such as those that track the performance of the S&P 500 index, which pretty much guarantees that your returns will be in line with the index?

In this case, home ownership becomes (1) a type of investment diversification, (2) insurance against rising rental costs and (3) insurance against being forced to relocate during retirement years (stressful, uncomfortable, risk of lifestyle downgrade).

For investors looking to fine tune interest rate risk or plan against future liabilities, BSJI can be a cost - efficient and effective option.

Standard theory says that you want to invest in low - cost funds (like those provided by Vanguard), and you want to have enough variety to protect against risk.

Many European banks bought them because they didn't have to put much capital against them for risk purposes, and the added yield helped them meet earnings targets, at a cost of greater illiquidity.

Then, you must weigh the cost of the plan against the risk of voluntarily or involuntarily being unable to complete school.

You'll need to weigh up fees and costs against other important factors like risk, likely returns and services before you choose a super fund.

This essentially allows you to lock in the current cost of college, protecting you against the risk that tuition costs will continue to rise.

Considering the relatively low medical risk and financial cost of vaccination compared to the potential benefits for feline health, community cats undergoing TNR should always be vaccinated against these diseases.

If we can't get it right with tobacco, where there's no benefit to weigh against the toll in lives and costs, how can we get it right with fossil fuels, where the real - time benefits of affordable energy seem always to trump the long - term risks from climate change?

My question is, if we can't get it right with tobacco, where there's no benefit to weigh against the toll in lives and costs, how can we get it right with fossil fuels, where the real - time benefits of affordable energy seem always to trump the long - term risks from climate change?

that the precautionary principle has been recruited so politically and specifically to guard against environmentalists concerns, on such a grand scale, and so consistently and repeatedly in disregard of the real risks, costs and very dangers inherent in many of the proposed solutions (e.g. biofuels / ethanol), would seem to indicate that the precautionary principle should be applied with the greatest of caution.