Sentences with phrase «risks moving into»

In addition, the proven track record of those existing assets is especially attractive as lenders look to create solid loan portfolios and minimize risks moving into what many anticipate could be the later stage of the current growth cycle.

Only with another's watchful eye would I risk moving into deeper waters.

Not exact matches

As the company widens its market, it's increasingly possible that the larger digital imaging companies will move into the space and risk turning awesome little point - of - view cameras into a commodity.

Introducing nuclear weapons into this process forces a nation to move with caution because the risk of massive retaliation is great.

«Following the U.K. election, the relative risk investors saw in European bonds came back and as the situation in Greece develops, risks will hopefully unwind and as we move into a certain environment, we can expect bond markets to continue to normalize,» Thomas Buckingham, portfolio manager of the European Equity Group at JP Morgan Asset Management, told CNBC on Monday.

In some ways, hiding money from Canada Revenue Agency using offshore accounts is just another option on this continuum, but when you take the risk into account, it's not a wise move.

«In a strong market, people tend to take more risks and move into some riskier assets.»

And the president's move to replace H.R. McMaster with policy hawk Bolton, who Sherman described as «a man who has never seen a war he does not want to wage,» could add more risk into the mix, especially ahead of a historic summit under consideration for Trump and Kim.

Today a real - life game of Risk is unfolding on the world stage, with major players moving their pieces into place.

Data that is safely locked away on premise or at a hosting provider still carries a certain degree of risk, but data that is moving beyond the firewall introduces a whole new set of elements into the equation that can be difficult, if not impossible, to control.

As an aside, this would represent a pretty cowardly move on the part of Flaherty and the Harper Conservatives who very clearly recognize the risks baked into the housing market, want it to cool, but also want the blame to fall on someone else should the «soft landing» turn into a bust.

If dealer inventories take the hit, risk assets get crushed and people move into Treasuries.

For example, some investors may have taken on more risk in their portfolios in recent years by moving into lower - quality bonds or dividend stocks, in an attempt to generate additional yield.

Specifically, we expect $ TAN to come into support of its 10 - week moving average (teal line) before it could be considered a low - risk re-entry on the buy side.

Ideally, we were prepared to enter a short position if $ GLD bounced into key resistance of its 50 - day moving average, which would have provided us with a low - risk entry point with a very positive reward - risk ratio.

I would not exclude another LTCM style episode of systemic risk given the risk of unraveling of highly leveraged carry trades and the end of easy liquidity: triggers could be a disorderly move of the US dollar, perhaps following trade war threats to China, leading to a 1987 - style stock market crash; or MBSs interacting with a housing slump and the hedging activities of GSEs; or greater corporate distress or a Ford / GM entering into Chapter 11 triggering a massive sell - off in the murky, non-transparent and untested credit derivatives.

I moved into dividend centric investing and then discovered there were uses for options that both generated income and reduced risk.

Goldman Sachs wrote in a research note earlier this week that the «[p] rice risk is likely skewed to the upside heading into Wednesday,» adding that «even in the absence of a cut, we expect the oil market to move into deficit by the second half of 2017.»

Since I prefer to sell short stocks and ETFs as they are bouncing into resistance, rather than on their initial break of support, the stalling action of $ EEM as it bounces into resistance of its 50 - day moving average now presents me with an ideal, low - risk entry point on the short side (click here to learn more about my short selling entry strategy).

If that threshold is exceeded, DMRI will move assets into US Treasurys — specifically, the most recent 5 - year note — to control risk.

With interest rates on low - risk investments falling to low levels in many countries, investors have sought to maintain yields by moving into higher - risk assets such as corporate debt and emerging market debt.

But I am concerned that late - cycle entrants into risk assets like stocks and high - yield bonds are taking a leap of faith at a time when there is less room for markets to move up and growing risks of them falling back.

UNG is now setting up for an ideal re-entry point that is lower risk than last month's initial buy entry because the ETF has come into intermediate - term support of its 50 - day moving average.

One point that might be worth making is that life expectancy is increasing and so the traditional view of moving into lower risk, lower return investments as one approaches retirement is not necessarily as sensible as it once was.

Instead of keeping 20 % in cash, thereby reducing expected risk to 12 %, the investor could move into 10y government bonds with a higher return than cash and even a little bit of negative correlation with equities.

As we move further into 2018 without the economic acceleration and boom (hysteria aside, the inflation scenario never got very far in junk markets), and with liquidity risk rising again, it can't be surprising that junk markets struggle.

As a result of the likely move into negative real returns on cash, more cash savers will move into UK government bonds (gilts), more gilt owners will swap them for corporate bonds, some more will move into equities, and a sliver of risk - takers will use cheaper financing to start businesses or take out loans to build property.

Specifically, you simply move along the efficient frontier and into other risky assets with lower risk and more diversification, e.g. bonds.

The idea behind this theory is that, as big investors sense that smaller - cap, higher - beta stocks have reached a point of overvaluation and high risk, these investors move money from the overvalued stocks into the Dow stocks, which are traditionally considered more stable and more liquid.

This means investors who want higher returns must consider taking on greater risk — by increasing leverage or moving into riskier asset classes.

Nevertheless, when sector level (oil) and country level markets move into transitional periods, volatility takes over, risk capital tries to find cover, and retail investors bail.

For this reason, many retirees have been seeking higher yields with dividend - paying stocks and even moving into high - yield, high - risk corporate bonds.

With the increase in risks and the choppiness of the dollar, the oil prices have favorable conditions to move higher and into the $ 70 region.

The analysts noted that Monster's «sharp upward stock move on modest growth improvement has brought risk / reward back into balance.

The fundamental human polarity is between separation and union, between the risk of moving into the future to become one's potential self and the risk of returning to the womb of the past and of conformity.

A mere hunch, however, wasn't enough to take the risk and move into wider channels.

Moving past a recall crisis, the company should plan internally for reentry into the market by preparing its logistics and determining how its new risk management strategies will influence other business activities.

If you are concerned about potential impacts on your farm from GM crops in your region, or if you are considering moving into broadacre organic production (particularly canola), please email or call Australian Certified Organic 07 3350 5716 to find out how to manage these risks.

Roman says to crimp only around the lip of the pie dish — move any further into the pie and you risk tearing or puncturing the dough.

I get your point mate.But in truth Ramsey is the CM and Xhaka is the DM according to our formation anf tactic.It's even debatable if Xhaka is capable of playing DM.I think Ramsey's tactical awareness is poor but he has every right to take risks and move into the opposition box.He's a box to box player.The only problem is Ramsey overdoes it.If we had a proper CDM the team would be more balanced.Now it's like we have two CM's playing in midfield and due to their poor tactical awareness we're always left exposed.I conclude by reminding people that Wilshere is better footballer and is more intelligent than Xhaka.It'll be better playing Wilshere and pairing him with a CDM than having Xhaka play there.He just gets to play over him becausr we signed him for # 35.

It's a sensible move from Tottenham, as ultimately while they will be bitterly disappointed to be without Kane for this important trip to Manchester, they can't afford to risk losing him for a significant period of time by rushing him into action and risk aggravating the injury.

SEE MORE: Liverpool & Tottenham risk losing out on midfield target as rivals move for 25 - year - old Video: Marko Grujic opens Liverpool account 12 minutes into debut; Reds buzzing on Twitter Liverpool transfer news: Reds prepared to pay # 25m to land top left - back target

Excellent win now move onto basel, I think a couple of players ran themselves into the ground n should be rotated to not risk injury.

Beyond anxieties over deselection (or the threat of it), footballers are often at risk of culture shock, whether in the literal sense of having to acclimatise to a new and unfamiliar country or in the more metaphorical sense of having to adapt quickly to life at a new club or a new level: a Championship player moving to an established Premier League side, a youth - team star breaking into the first - team squad, a veteran making his way down the leagues.

Sandro can be effective moving up into the attack, but that can't be the only way you can change a game, and you run the risk of burning out the healthy forwards, much the way it looked last year.

The way I see it, the choice is: either maintain a crap status quo for fear of regression, or take a step into the unknown that carries with it some risk, but ultimately will be the better move.

It takes a lot of responsibility on the side of the parents and the caregivers to choose the product carefully, ensure it meets government requirements, make sure they are vigilant in watching the child as they use the toy and to remove any risk of the child moving into unsafe locations with baby gates.

You see, the Slumber Sleeper has what one might call a self - regulating quality that prevents babies in the five month range (the window when rolling starts but SIDS risks remain) from moving themselves into an unsafe position.

Babies who can roll themselves over are at a significantly decreased risk of SIDS, which experts believe is because babies with that ability have also developed the maturity to sense trouble during sleep and move into a safer position.

However, if they suspect a child may be at risk it would move over into welfare territory rather than home ed.