Sentences with phrase «risks of a given case»

Not exact matches

In my personal opinion, the emphasis upon taking out insurance against downside risks lies in conflict with the shift to data dependency given long and variable lags of monetary policy impacts on the broader economy which could have counselled front - loading insurance cuts rather than scattering them (if delivering any more at all) in which case precious little insurance has been taken out.

In my case, Real Estate is my biggest risk given it accounts for 52 % of my total passive income.

Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal framework must «level the balance of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)

In the best case scenario, he will be out for a month and a half — giving him a slight chance of representing France at Euro 2016 [according to MD]-- while he also risks being ruled out for the rest of the season, which would end his hopes of featuring for Didier Deschamps» selection on home soil this summer.

1) offload the deadwood at the risk of breaking even at least before the end of July to reduce the squad # and lighten the wage bill (2 things more important than making # # #) 2) make the proper acquisition to not only lift the squad but also to protect in the case you still have to sell players like Sanchez or Ox It was a summer where the fans gave Wenger one last chance to tweak his approach sell who needed to go and make proper big signings... he failed in both.

West Bromwich Albion have made an official complaint to the Premier League about the fixture scheduling that gives West Ham United five days» extra rest before Tuesday's meeting between the two clubs and also submitted medical evidence to support their case that playing twice in the space of 48 hours severely increases the risk of players picking up injuries.

Available free of charge on MomsTEAM's new SmartTeams concussion website, the #TeamUp4ConcussionSafetyTM program, developed by MomsTEAM Institute as part of its SmartTeams Play SafeTM initiative with a Mind Matters Educational Challenge Grant from the National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense, is designed to do just that: to increase reporting by athletes of concussion symptoms by engaging coaches, athletes, parents, and health care providers in a season - long, indeed career - long program which emphasizes that immediate reporting of concussion symptoms - not just by athletes themselves but by their teammate «buddies» - not only reduces the risk the athlete will suffer a more serious brain injury - or, in rare cases, even death - but is actually helps the team's chances of winning, not just in that game, but, by giving athletes the best chance to return as quickly as possible from concussion, the rest of the season, and by teaching that honest reporting is a valued team behavior and a hallmark of a good teammate.

Bettina — this reminds me of Alton Brown and «Good Eats» where the food safety version of the MiB shows up and give him all sorts of grief, probably in cases where risk - averse regulatory types and litigation - nervous lawyers, about things he wants to do (like making hollandaise or even carpaccio.)

In my case my not having to get out of bed, my husband continuing to sleep, the security I feel I am giving to my baby, the fact that I respond to the baby before s / he cries, shorter feedings, more sleep, the pleasure of having the baby near me all night, and an increased period of infertility, are not enough to counter a possible increased risk of SIDS that is unlikely to be backed up by future studies.

And of course, in case of a high risk pregnancy you're not allowed to give birth at home.

Actually there are other kinds of foreign policy risks they may be managing, and that they are given strategic powers to deal with — economic risk, threats to our national economy which in practise may mean something more akin to industrial espionage, as certainly seems to be the case in the USA.

Given the possibility of a worst - case analysis by the defender, privateering magnifies the risk of unintentionally setting off an escalatory spiral.

That value may dwindle to nothing or less if the Brexit process is badly mishandled or if the economic consequences become severe and the government takes the blame but those are risks that May presumably feels she has to run — and which are in any case no more than the risks of a soft (or «fake») Brexit given the intense scrutiny many Tory MPs will give the choices made.

The fund prides itself on presenting less risk than is often the case when approaching other venture capitalists given that most of UCF's funds do not have to be repaid.

In the few cases where there are many skeletons, one can construct mortality tables like the ones life insurance companies use to calculate expected life span and risk of death at any given age.

Some participants read a «low - risk» message that highlighted the low likelihood of contracting the disease in the US, with about one recorded case for every 100,000 individuals in a given year.

Influenza remains a major health problem in the United States, resulting each year in an estimated 36,000 deaths and 200,000 hospitalizations.4 Those who have been shown to be at high risk for the complications of influenza infection are children 6 to 23 months of age; healthy persons 65 years of age or older; adults and children with chronic diseases, including asthma, heart and lung disease, and diabetes; residents of nursing homes and other long - term care facilities; and pregnant women.4 It is for this reason that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that these groups, together with health care workers and others with direct patient - care responsibilities, should be given priority for influenza vaccination this season in the face of the current shortage.1 Other high - priority groups include children and teenagers 6 months to 18 years of age whose underlying medical condition requires the daily use of aspirin and household members and out - of - home caregivers of infants less than 6 months old.1 Hence, in the case of vaccine shortages resulting either from the unanticipated loss of expected supplies or from the emergence of greater - than - expected global influenza activity — such as pandemic influenza, which would prompt a greater demand for vaccination5 — the capability of extending existing vaccine supplies by using alternative routes of vaccination that would require smaller doses could have important public health implications.

Given the information we have, potentially over a million cases of Zika caused by mosquito transmission versus two cases of sexual transmission, the additional risk appears small.

Given the 50 people identified as at high - risk «we should not be surprised if we see new cases coming out,» from the new case identified in the village of Sella Kafta in the northern district of Kambia, he said.»

X-rays give off radiation and have, in some cases, been associated with an increased risk of cancer.

«We had a good idea of what the prevalence of vulvodynia was but this data gives us a better understanding of how often new cases develop and the potential risk factors that may be involved,» says lead author Barbara D. Reed, M.D., M.S.P.H., professor of family medicine at the U-M Medical School.

Given the description of your husband's bowels and food intolerances, depending on what his doctor says, it may be that he will need to continue to be careful with coarse / fibrous foods in order to reduced risk of blockage, in which case some nourishing pureed soups and smoothies will hopefully appeal.

«Given that the effect of social connections on risk for heart disease and stroke and death is equivalent and, in many cases, exceeds that of other factors such as light smoking, obesity, high blood pressure and air quality, we need to start taking social connection seriously for our health,» she said.

In IDP camps, there are cases where the perpetrator is allowed to remain in the community through a community settlement out of fear that the perpetrator would be given a lengthy service in the formal justice system, putting survivors at risk of reprisals and further sexual violence.

Resources provide opportunities to: - explore how adverts play on our fears and dreams - explore persuasive language in advertising - explore presentational features - analyse adverts across 3 mediums (TV, radio and web)- explore synergy - study advertising across a range of mediums - plan own advertising campaign - conduct risk assessments and planning document as would be the case in the industry - give a pitch for the campaign created - explore legal and ethical - investigate the ASA (advertising standards agency)- consider budgets - conduct primary and secondary research - gather qualitative and quantitative data A work book is also included for students to complete as they study the course.

* Nikkei reverses morning gains * Ebola - related shares boosted on suspected Ebola case * Test results expected by Tuesday morning By Thomas Wilson TOKYO, Dec 29 (Reuters)- Japan's Nikkei gave up early gains on Monday after the health ministry announced a suspected case of the deadly Ebola virus, dampening investor risk appetite but boosting health - related shares.

Using historical data is often simple but may be hard in cases where the amount of data you have on a given event is low (e.g. risk of bust by investing in a cryptocurrency).

However, in many cases a full contribution amount may not be available early in the year, the investor may be averse to taking the risk of a lump - sum investment in given market conditions, or may not have a complete view of his / her income and tax situation until later in the contribution time frame.

But is there a chance that given the extreme lack of risk taking and lending by banks that even healthy companies may cut dividends simply as a risk management mechanism to save capital in case their banks / debt holders are so risk averse that they do not roll over existing debt?

Banks take more of a risk by giving out such loans with no asset or property to recover in - case a borrower defaults, which is the main reason why their interests rates a significantly higher.

Given that the average is much nearer the best case scenario than the worst case, I am happy to take the risk of comparatively losing $ 25k compared to the possibility of gaining $ 8 million...

Finding a caretaker and allocating a reasonable amount of money to them in case of you die or become incapacitated at an early age will minimize the risk of the pet becoming abandoned or given to a shelter, Di Vito said, adding that a pet can not be named as a direct beneficiary in a will.

In such cases, the Sharpe ratio would not give an accurate representation of the investment's risk / return profile (see Figure 6).

The lower risk part is not exactly desirable in the case of covered calls because an investor is giving up the upside volatility but at least some studies showed covered call strategies performing as well as passive strategies.

If one thinks that given a worst case scenario an investment could be worth $ 90 an investor would risk $ 100 if the investor made this a 10 % position (and holds the rest in t - bills for the sake of an example).

Given that California is a best - case scenario * compared to other states (and, of course, countries) far more dependent on coal, Long's piece and the underlying report pose a strong challenge to those calling for a «deploy, deploy, deploy» approach to cutting climate risks.

Even if we are careful students of the historical record, it is not enough in this case to give us a proper sense of the risk.

It's not too difficult to construct a skeletal case explaining why and how Gleick may justifiably have felt morally compelled to lie to Heartland, given his state of information about risks we face and the role of Heartland with regard to those risks.

But in this case, given the risk - management challenges we face and the policy alternatives under consideration, it is our judgment that a carbon tax is a preferred course of public policy action versus cap and trade approaches.»

Weinstein found a clip of Gruber suggesting that states that did not create health insurance exchanges risked giving up the ACA's subsidies; it went straight into the King v. Burwell brief, and into a case that's currently headed to the Supreme Court.

At the risk of appearing to defend cherry picking which is so self - evidently contrary to the scientific method I wonder if it doesn't smell so bad in the case of dendrochronology given its origins in archaeology and dating wooden artifacts like church pews or picture frames.In that application one has a shortish snippet of a tree ring width series which is an absolute fact and then slides under it a set of candidate tree ring width time series of known date to identify a best match to the snippet.

Given that a case can be made that current levels atmospheric ghg concentrations are already harming or putting people and ecosystems at risk, it is difficult to make an ethically acceptable case that atmospheric ghg concentration targets higher than current levels are justified unless consent is given by those who are already being harmed by warming or full compensation is made to those who through no fault of their own are harmed by climate chGiven that a case can be made that current levels atmospheric ghg concentrations are already harming or putting people and ecosystems at risk, it is difficult to make an ethically acceptable case that atmospheric ghg concentration targets higher than current levels are justified unless consent is given by those who are already being harmed by warming or full compensation is made to those who through no fault of their own are harmed by climate chgiven by those who are already being harmed by warming or full compensation is made to those who through no fault of their own are harmed by climate change.

Given the serious risks of climate change and the human rights implications of not dealing with it, judges interpreting climate cases around the world are increasingly making decisions that will place them on the right side of history.

Given that many (not all) highly regarded climatologists regard the «catastrophic» case as the most likely case and that much of the research literature, including the IPCC report devotes substantial space to quantifying the uncertainties, I tend to conclude that the current state of knowledge regards the risk of catastrophic climate change as significant and that the precautionary principle applies.

And given the current state of the manufactured «paradigm» in climate science, a case could certainly be made that the management of any corporation at risk from a scientific change, such as the collapse of the current paradigm, has a fiduciary duty to investigate plausible potential challenges to that «paradigm».

Most importantly, in the NS & ME case (Case C - 411 / 10 and C - 493 / 10), decided in December 2011, the CJEU followed the ratio of MSS, holding that «Dublin» transfers must be suspended where the transferring State can not be unaware of systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the responsible State which give rise to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker will face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 4 of the Charcase (Case C - 411 / 10 and C - 493 / 10), decided in December 2011, the CJEU followed the ratio of MSS, holding that «Dublin» transfers must be suspended where the transferring State can not be unaware of systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the responsible State which give rise to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker will face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 4 of the CharCase C - 411 / 10 and C - 493 / 10), decided in December 2011, the CJEU followed the ratio of MSS, holding that «Dublin» transfers must be suspended where the transferring State can not be unaware of systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the responsible State which give rise to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker will face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 4 of the Charter.

given the ethics rules and the risk of being sued, lawyers would naturally assure their paralegals were properly trained and supervised in whatever tasks and responsibilities were assigned to them (as is currently the case), and

Even a very incomplete list gives an impression of the large number of significant opinions he has written: seminal administrative law cases such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, the intellectual property case Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios (which made clear that making individual videotapes of television programs did not constitute copyright infringement), important war on terror precedents such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, important criminal law cases such as Padilla v. Kentucky (holding that defense counsel must inform the defendant if a guilty plea carries a risk of deportation) and Atkins v. Virginia (which reversed precedent to hold it was unconstitutional to impose capital punishment on the mentally retarded), and of course Apprendi v. New Jersey (which revolutionized criminal sentencing by holding that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based on facts other than those decided by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).

Given that recovery can either be barred or offset based on a plaintiff's assumption of risk, defendants in negligence cases will often try to assert the theory's applicability when confronted with allegations of negligence.

But, if a guy with a gun intrudes and puts some innocent person at genuine risk, it would be justified to defend yourself - and Section 33 gives you the benefit of the doubt in close cases.