Sentences with phrase «risky assets paying»

Not exact matches

More specifically, investors have sought the potential for higher returns from riskier assets like private company stocks, as safer investments like T - bills and bonds pay out next to nothing.

While issuing warnings or trying to educate the public against what regulators fear are risky investments are not uncommon around the world, in this case they tried to sway public opinion against crypto assets by paying social media influencers to attack them.

Unfortunately, in a world in which cash pays next to nothing and even riskier assets, like stocks and bonds, have a lower long - term expected return than they once did (according to a BlackRock analysis using Bloomberg data), holding a sizeable portion of one's retirement savings in cash could prevent many from reaching their financial goals.

When reading «The Intelligent Investor» they claim that you can increase you position to 100 % stocks (risky) if you meet a number of criteria, one of which is liquid assets to pay for living expenses for 1 year.

So investors may be reconsidering what to pay for risky assets.

In 2014 only very risky assets are paying 8 % interest.

It's true that some see peer - to - peer lending as a risky asset class because you are relying on strangers to pay the loan back.

J.P. Morgan has agreed to pay $ 75 million to settle litigation alleging it invested its stable value funds in risky assets, causing losses to retirement plan participants.

They are willing to pay remarkably higher prices for risky assets.

It also means you draw down your risky assets (investments) while preserving your risk - free assets (your government - paid, inflation - protected pensions).

When you implicitly and explicitly suggest that rates will remain lower for longer, people begin to count on risky assets being safer than they are; similarly, the size of debts can become so large that those who trusted the policy makers lose the ability to service the debt (let alone pay it back) when borrowing costs go up.

The RORO environment meant investors either felt they were, or were not getting paid for taking the risk to invest in risky assets.

All of this has a way of reducing risk, too, because it's naturally less risky (in terms of capital risked) to pay less than more for the same asset.

The far more risky asset class was paying the far lower return.

But to get that better interest rate (or sometimes any loan at all) can be risky; if you are unable to pay off your loan as scheduled, the assets you used as collateral will be seized and sold, and the money raised by selling the assets will be used to repay the loan.

While issuing warnings or trying to educate the public against what regulators fear are risky investments are not uncommon around the world, in this case they tried to sway public opinion against crypto assets by paying social media influencers to attack them.

While it's not unusual for governments or agencies to issue warnings or try to educate the public on what regulators may consider risky investments, Polish financial authorities have taken it a step further, spending taxpayers» money on a smear campaign — trying to sway public opinion against crypto assets by paying social media influencers to attack them.

I find it interesting that people that are risk adverse always want to pay off their mortgages when in reality, paying off assets that are not liquid is much more risky.

Also NSAM has the ability to earn incentive fees each quarter based on NRF's cash available for distribution (or CAD) which may create an incentive for NSAM to invest in assets with higher yield potential, which are generally riskier or more speculative, or sell an asset prematurely for a gain and pay down borrowings, in an effort to increase its short - term net income and thereby increase the incentive fees to which it is entitled.