Sentences with phrase «risky than a growth»

For a value stock to turn profitable, the market must alter its perception of the company, which is considered riskier than a growth entity developing.

A value stock is considered riskier than a growth stock.

Very less risky than a growth stock for sure and even though I am invested in a couple of growth stocks, dividend producing securities take up the majority.

Hence, value firms are perceived as being riskier than their growth counterparts and, as such, should command a premium.

Companies that are small tend to be riskier than large companies while value - based companies tend to be riskier than growth - based companies, so it is important to diversify across all 9 style profiles, even if one part is weighted heavier than the others based on your risk tolerance.

Not exact matches

We believe the Statoil acquisition strengthens the company's business risk profile by adding an established, profitable c - store and fuel retailer with a strong market share of more than 30 % in the mature markets of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark with good growth prospects in riskier, more fragmented Eastern Europe.

This tendency to play it safe may lead managers to favor surefire cost reductions over risky growth, for instance, or to milk an existing business rather than experiment with a new business model.

Choosing the best compression shirts for breast growth in men is a cheaper and lot less risky solution than surgery or pills.

Countries with high projected growth rates are perceived as less risky than those with low projected growth, and lower risk usually means lower returns.

I think this is considerably less risky than buying an S&P 500 index fund, much less a growth stock index fund.

Emerging markets have higher long - term expected growth rates than developed markets, and they are more risky.

Dividend growth stocks are something I would like to include in my portfolio, if for no other reason than to mitigate the damage from dividend cuts my more riskier stocks experience.

They are less risky that pure equity or growth funds, which are likely to give greater returns, but more risky than pure debt plans.

If you own value companies one by one, they can be riskier than more popular growth companies, although I have argued many times that owning any individual stock is unnecessarily risky.

But arguably, my dependence on event - driven / deep value investments is (much) less risky than a portfolio reliant on over - priced / potential high - growth stories which may never materialise.

Since these funds are riskier than large caps, the scope for growth is much more with mid caps.

In general, although volatility can change on any asset (i.e., TLT is a good example), fixed income assets are less risky than higher - yielding income; large cap dividend stocks are not as risky / volatile as large cap growth or small caps, which are not as risky as foreign and emerging equity and so forth.

Emerging economies might offer greater growth potential than advanced economies, but the stocks of companies located in emerging markets could be substantially more volatile, risky, and less liquid than the stocks of companies located in more developed foreign markets.

This can make these policies more risky, however, they may also be able to obtain more growth than regular universal life or whole life policies.

While this can allow the opportunity for more growth than a whole or universal life insurance policy, it can also be more risky.