Sentences with phrase «risky than buying»

ETFs are just groups of stocks, commodities, or bonds, and they're less risky than buying individual assets because the group works to balance itself out; if one stock tanks, it's offset by other assets in the ETF.

This investment asset class is often considered less risky than buying stocks which isn't always true since some fixed income investments are very risky.

Like any ETF, bond ETFs fluctuate or change value in price over time, so these are more risky than buying the bond itself.

For example, if you're buying a bond from a company, that might be more risky than buying one from the Federal Government.

I think this is considerably less risky than buying an S&P 500 index fund, much less a growth stock index fund.

Generally seen as less risky than buying the stock, but it is important to remember that options expire and stocks do not.

Buying a franchise isn't less risky than buying a non-franchise business.

Because of this, covered calls are less risky than a buy - and - hold strategy.

These swap - based investments are called synthetic ETFs and they're usually riskier than buying a straight index - tracking product, says Shum.

Buying individual stocks is riskier than buying shares in a stock mutual fund because buying one or even several individual stocks offers little or no diversification.

Buying individual bonds generally is riskier than buying shares of a bond mutual fund or ETF because buying one or a few individual bonds offers little or no diversification.

Not exact matches

While it's better to invest than keep money under a mattress, buying risk free securities, such as guaranteed income certificates or low - yielding government bonds, could actually be riskier than purchasing higher returning products, says Ted Rechtshaffen, president and CEO of Toronto's TriDelta Financial Partners.

By creating that delusion, investors become prone to «carry trade» speculation — buying any risky security that offers a yield better than zero.

This very low market volatility can lead investors to take on more risk, and in a period of still relatively low interest rates, to «reach for yield» — that is, buy riskier assets than one would otherwise, in order to achieve a desired profit or savings goal.

This actually encouraged the more risky approach of employees buying the stock with their savings rather than the grants of stock on which ESOPs are based.

But buying used graphics cards can be a risky bargain — GPUs used for Ethereum mining are usually running around the clock, which wears them out far quicker than when they are just used for gaming.

If you're looking for an options strategy that provides the ability to produce income but may be less risky than simply buying dividend - paying stocks, you might want to consider selling covered calls.

Every action has risks including inaction, we know that our strike force at the moment is not up to EPL winning quality, inaction means, we are ok with that, we are also ok to take a chance of injuries, just like Welbeck went down Giroud could too, in any case all I am trying to say is that not buying is just as risky and can be even more so than buying.

Buying in to a Zenos now is still probably more risky than the Caterham and Ariel options outlined in the article but definitely worth considering for something more modern than a Caterham, more civilised than an Ariel and much more bang - for - the - buck than either.

That left bookstore buyers pretty blameless in their buying and they favored safe, steady sellers rather than risky new authors that might, but probably wouldn't, break out.

After the disappointment with the TouchPad and the dissolving of some other tablet lines, running out and buying the «hot new thing» has become a much riskier venture than in the past.

The same principle applies in reverse, however, making these leveraged buyouts potentially very risky; if the acquired company's ROA is lower than the cost of the debt used to buy it, then the private equity fund's ROE is less than if hadn't used debt.

This may or may not be the absolute best time to buy a home in the US but we can say with some confidence that it is less risky buying a home after prices have dropped sharply than it would have back in 2005 after years of strong home price increases.

If you're looking for an options strategy that provides the ability to produce income but may be less risky than simply buying dividend - paying stocks, you might want to consider selling covered calls.

Buying on margin is riskier than paying with just cash - sometimes much riskier.

After all, today's «must buy» may be significantly riskier than what you're comfortable with.

Most of the time, they say to make it so as soon as they see you have a system using more than a few asset classes, the returns are good compared to the markets, there's a healthy amount of bonds, you're recommending small amounts of risky asset classes, you're not trading stocks / ETFs, not trying to predict the future, and you're using mutual funds in a mostly «buy and hold» fashion.

For them, a diversified equity portfolio, bought over time, will prove far less risky than dollar - based securities.

There is also good data about buying when the market is as low as it is (which could be negative as in example # 1), but if you're a newbie to that, I would still suggest paying off the CC first (a good 20 % return on the money, to your pocket and not to the CC company's) rather than entering into a volatile (read risky) market that you do not understand.

Certainly less risky than a straight buy - and - hold strategy.

Not only did the buy - and - hold strategy outperform but it was also less risky than the strategy of chasing fund performance.

They also tend to be less risky because they're more diversified than just buying shares in one company.

Although the price has held up and I could have been receiving the 6 - 7 % yield for the last 2 years, it was a much riskier asset than when I bought it (some shares were bought with a 25 % + / - yield) and no margin of safety.

More literate households hold riskier positions when expected returns are higher, they more actively rebalance their portfolios and do so in a way that holds their risk exposure relatively constant over time, and they are more likely to buy assets that provide higher returns than the assets that they sell.

In fact, a recent Fidelity survey found that many investors think index funds, which attempt to match a market benchmark like the S&P 500 (before fees), are less risky than active funds, which attempt to outperform a benchmark.1 That may help explain why during 11 weeks of heightened market volatility in 2015, investors bought index funds but sold active funds at seven times the average rate during nonvolatile weeks.2

ETFs tracks the index very closely, but a wide bid - ask spread or deviations from fair value might make ordering «at market value» a bit risky — you could end up buying / selling your shares at a much higher / lower price than you expect.

No one makes this point better than Howard Marks who writes: «Superior investors know — and buy — when the price of something is lower than it should be... most investors think quality, as opposed to price, is the determinant of whether something's risky.

This Simple Guide describes why stock investing is riskier than you probably think, then explains how to take control of your money and build wealth, without buying stocks if you choose, to help assure the sort of retirement you want.

Buying on margin can be very risky — you can lose more money than you originally invested.

The beauty of these options strategies is that they are less risky than just «buying and holding» stock so most brokerage firms will allow you to trade them in an IRA.

Buying a fund of REITs, preferred shares or high - yield bonds is certainly less risky than trying to pick two or three individual winners.

Some examples include a contract dispute where less than the projected product sales were reaped on expensive, luxury medical machines because hospitals didn't want to buy them, environmental / bankruptcy claims alleging fraud where a spun - off company failed because of decreased housing demands, and fraud claims where investors made risky investments without protections and lost big.

Because the individuals that usually obtain rapid decision coverage are often considered to be more risky than those who buy traditional coverage, the premiums for this insurance can be higher than for policies of comparable coverage.

The interesting thing about your relative safeness or riskiness is: One insurance provider will sometimes perceive the exact same person buying the exact same policy as much more (or much less) risky than the next.

It only justifies our fears that buying content from Samsung — rather than, say, Google or Amazon — is risky, that the ecosystem Samsung is creating is spotty and only available on select devices.

For riskier ventures, such as building new homes and buying, renovating and selling existing ones, they're finding quick financing can be easier to get online than from banks.