A value stock is considered
riskier than a growth stock.
Very less
risky than a growth stock for sure and even though I am invested in a couple of growth stocks, dividend producing securities take up the majority.
Not exact matches
I think this is considerably less
risky than buying an S&P 500 index fund, much less a
growth stock index fund.
For a value
stock to turn profitable, the market must alter its perception of the company, which is considered
riskier than a
growth entity developing.
Dividend
growth stocks are something I would like to include in my portfolio, if for no other reason
than to mitigate the damage from dividend cuts my more
riskier stocks experience.
If you own value companies one by one, they can be
riskier than more popular
growth companies, although I have argued many times that owning any individual
stock is unnecessarily
risky.
In general, although volatility can change on any asset (i.e., TLT is a good example), fixed income assets are less
risky than higher - yielding income; large cap dividend
stocks are not as
risky / volatile as large cap
growth or small caps, which are not as
risky as foreign and emerging equity and so forth.
Emerging economies might offer greater
growth potential
than advanced economies, but the
stocks of companies located in emerging markets could be substantially more volatile,
risky, and less liquid
than the
stocks of companies located in more developed foreign markets.