Sentences with phrase «risky than stock market»

Bond market returns were also more volatile than single - family rental returns, but less risky than stock market returns on an annual basis.

Not exact matches

In many ways, the private student loan market operates much differently than the traditional stock market and might be even riskier.

Many investors feel stock markets are more volatile and that investing is riskier today than ever before.

And, although I agree that lenders should consider the investment on the high - risk side, I'm not convinced that it is much riskier than the stock and bond market - AT THIS TIME.

Another option, though may be not as safe as CDs or money market accounts, is high quality dividend paying stocks (always understand that investing in the stock market is riskier than putting money in bank accounts), some with more than 5 % dividend yield at the end of 2010.

If our model predicts a higher loss potential than you have specified for your portfolio, we will execute a reallocation from a riskier asset class (such as stocks) into a lower risk asset class (such as government bonds or money market funds).

A fund that invests in just one type of stock or bond such as one industry sector, world region, country, or market capitalization will be less diversified and more risky than a broad based fund that invests in many companies across multiple industries, countries, and market caps.

Let's say the risk - free rate of return is 1 %, the market itself is expected to return 4 percentage points more than the risk - free rate (so the market's risk premium is 4 %), and a stock has a beta of 1.5, which makes it more risky than the market.

Stocks of companies in emerging markets are generally more risky than stocks of companies in developed counStocks of companies in emerging markets are generally more risky than stocks of companies in developed counstocks of companies in developed countries.

In addition, small - cap and value stocks are riskier than the overall market, and therefore also have higher expected returns.

For a value stock to turn profitable, the market must alter its perception of the company, which is considered riskier than a growth entity developing.

I found this part of the article interesting:... he says, long - term investors must hold stocks, because risky as the market may be, it is still likely to produce better returns than the alternatives.

REIT — reasonable returns, but riskier than the broad market; with a relatively low correlation with stocks you can profit from rebalancing.

People have believed that stocks are more risky than bonds for as far back as there have been stock markets.

Most of the time, they say to make it so as soon as they see you have a system using more than a few asset classes, the returns are good compared to the markets, there's a healthy amount of bonds, you're recommending small amounts of risky asset classes, you're not trading stocks / ETFs, not trying to predict the future, and you're using mutual funds in a mostly «buy and hold» fashion.

Many investors feel stock markets are more volatile and that investing is riskier today than ever before.

Global stock market investing still remains riskier in many ways than investing in North America.

One school of thought is that value stocks are riskier than the market as a whole and investors are compensated with higher expected returns for the additional risk.

Stocks Better than Bonds in the Long Run Bonds, which are often seen as «safe» by investors who have never invested in the stock market, or those who have lost a lot of money in stocks, are «risky» in the long run owing to the inability of their returns (interest) to beat inflStocks Better than Bonds in the Long Run Bonds, which are often seen as «safe» by investors who have never invested in the stock market, or those who have lost a lot of money in stocks, are «risky» in the long run owing to the inability of their returns (interest) to beat inflstocks, are «risky» in the long run owing to the inability of their returns (interest) to beat inflation.

And I further suggest that, once you have retired, investing more than 20 % of your nest egg in stocks is a highly risky strategy, given modern stock market behavior.

While stocks are riskier than bonds or CDs because there's no guarantee individual companies will succeed, the stock market outperforms safer options over the long - term.

This portfolio allows the investor to be aggressive, but improve the odds of reducing their risk to permanent loss by better shielding the portfolio from stock market declines during periods when the equity markets are riskier than normal.

The only way an investor can possibly obtain a higher return than the market is by investing in riskier stocks.

«In the long run, dividend - paying stocks are slightly less risky — and more rewarding — than the equity market as a whole,» he says.

Stocks Gain on Increased Demand for Risky Assets U.S. equity markets erased earlier losses triggered by the weaker than expected U.S. Non-Farm Payrolls Report to close higher for the day.

This opened up the arena to privately held companies to help fill the void.In many ways, the private student loan market operates much differently than the traditional stock market and might be even riskier.

Am I wrong to think that international funds (especially emerging markets) are riskier than US stocks and should therefore have higher returns over the long term?

Given that dividend stocks are value stocks, and value stocks have higher expected returns and therefore higher risk than the market, why is that dividend stocks are less risky than the market - at least XDV and CDZ?

Having all your shares in one company is very risky — far more risky than owning a broad stock market investment.

Market - linked or equity - linked GICs are a bit riskier than traditional GICs, because it is essentially part GIC, part stock market invesMarket - linked or equity - linked GICs are a bit riskier than traditional GICs, because it is essentially part GIC, part stock market invesmarket investment.

Just as is the case in developed markets, riskier small and value stocks produce higher returns than large - cap stocks over the long term.

Traditionally, this has been brushed aside by asserting that small cap stocks and value stocks are riskier than the market so it is not surprising that the returns are higher.

Investing in the stock and bond markets, even through diversified mutual funds, is risky; investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when sold.

For this reason, while emerging - markets investments can produce some pretty impressive returns when things are going well, it's important to understand that they are inherently riskier than U.S. stocks and should be just one part of a well - diversified portfolio.

Funds that hold stock from many emerging markets are clearly less risky than single - country or regional emerging market funds.

Thus in normal markets if bond yields rise they become more attractive than risky stocks, so money shifts.

Emerging economies might offer greater growth potential than advanced economies, but the stocks of companies located in emerging markets could be substantially more volatile, risky, and less liquid than the stocks of companies located in more developed foreign markets.

I think stock investing is far riskier than most small investors believe, mainly because most small investors have been duped by clever Wall Street marketing.

In addition, research reveals that a «tilt» toward small - cap and value stocks (which can be riskier than the broad market) can increase expected returns over the very long term.

«These products are riskier than term because you're hitching your death benefit to the performance of the stock market.»

Since the level of volatility in the cryptocurrency market is orders of magnitude greater than even the riskiest stock, it just makes sense that investors would hedge their bets and that they would take some of their Bitcoin profits and put it into Litecoin.