British Columbia's automatic
roadside prohibition regime has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada after its rulings on Goodwin v. British Columbia and Wilson v. British Columbia today.
Background: The petitioners were motorists who had received 90 - day roadside driving prohibitions -LRB-» IRP») under provisions in the Motor Vehicle Act («MVA») establishing an automatic
roadside prohibition regime («ARP») after they had either refused to supply a sample of breath, or having... [more]
- Provisions in Motor Vehicle Act establishing automatic
roadside prohibition regime for motorists registering a failure on an approved screening device infringing s. 8 of Charter (unreasonable search and seizure) and not salvageable under s. 1
Not exact matches
Charter of rights: In September 2010, the B.C. legislature enacted amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act that introduced an «automatic
roadside prohibition»
regime.
Mr. Duncan also maintains a busy practice assisting Clients who receive
roadside prohibitions under the Province of British Columbia's relatively new administrative drinking and driving
regime.
215.41 to 215.51, referenced to as the «automatic
roadside prohibition»
regime («ARP») and sometimes referred to as the «immediate
roadside prohibition»
regime («IRP»).
Since September 20, 2010, the Immediate
Roadside Prohibition (IRP)
regime largely replaced the judicial process in the field of drinking and driving offences.