Sentences with phrase «roadside screening»

The public therefore accepts the use of breath samples both for roadside screening and ultimately for the determination of blood alcohol levels.

Subsequent police investigation suggested signs and symptoms of impairment as well as a failed roadside screening test.

A combination of roadside screening, subsequent breath samples and expert extrapolation suggested that she was well above the legal limit for alcohol consumption at the time of the accident.

The Criminal Code provides strict requirements for roadside screening device and Breathalyzer demands.

The saliva samples were analyzed using two roadside screening devices, the Draeger DrugTest 5000 (DT5000) and Alere DDS2 (DDS2); these devices use THC cutoff points of 5 µg / L and 25 µg / L, respectively, to determine if someone is positive or negative for marijuana use.

By the end of 2011 all of us will get a taste of what it feels like to be branded a criminal as police gain the power to stop anyone, anytime, anywhere without cause and require them to undergo a roadside screening for alcohol.

In this case, the appellant had failed a roadside screening device test after being stopped by police; he provided samples of his breath at the police station, which registered readings significantly over the legal limit, and was charged with driving «over 80,» contrary to s. 253 of the Criminal Code.

As a result, the police demanded that Laura blow into a roadside screening device, which she failed.

He was arrested at the roadside for impaired driving, without the use of a roadside screening device test.

It is not against the law to fail a roadside screening device test, but failing this test will give the officer reasonable and probable grounds to detain the person and demand a formal breath or blood sample as soon as possible.

If someone refuses to comply with a valid demand for a roadside screening test, a breathalyser test, or a blood sample, he or she can be charged with refusal under section 254 (5) of the Criminal Code.

A roadside screening device is a portable instrument that is kept in many police cars.

An officer may have reasonable and probable grounds by taking into consideration any physicial signs of impairment or through the use of a «roadside screening device».

If someone is driving or has care and control of a motor vehicle and a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that he or she has alcohol in their body, the officer may demand that the person use a roadside screening device.

The Traffic Safety Act allows the provincial government to automatically suspend a person's licence if the person blows over».05» into the roadside screening device or refuses to blow.

A person does NOT have the right to contact a lawyer before taking the roadside screening test.

Sometimes, for instance at a roadblock the police request a driver to provide a sample of breath into a handheld device commonly referred to as a «roadside screening device».

The client was asked to blow into a roadside screening device.

Basically, a Roadside Suspension can not be disputed unless you ask the police officer to administer a roadside screening device and he refused to do so.

Those errors can can mean that the roadside screening device and / or the breath machine can be wrong and the driver innocent.

As part of its decision, the board noted «a number of unorthodox aspects» to A.B.'s arrest, including the fact Woodburn didn't administer a roadside screening device and didn't end up having the lawyer undergo a breathalyzer test at the police station.

There is a reason why the roadside screening results are not even admissible in court.

When Client drove out, despite showing no difficulties with either his driving or any of his behaviour, the Police demanded, and the Client gave, a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as the «ASD», the «RSD» or the Roadside Screening Device).

The police, not without their own failings, would determine the fate of any individual pulled over, or otherwise detained, to blow into a roadside screening device.

Upon police arrival he is required to give a sample of his breath into a roadside screening device (also known as an «Approved Screening Device» or an ASD).

Although he denied consuming any alcohol, the police officer detected an odour of liquor from Client's breath and administered a roadside screening test (also known an Approved Screening Device, or «ASD») and arrested the Client for driving with a blood alcohol content (or «BAC») of over 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of blood.

After the police officer detected an odour of liquor on Client's breath, Client was required to take a roadside screening test (also known as an Approved Screening Device or «ASD»).

A roadside screening test was performed with a «fail» result.

Client stopped by police officer who demands Client supply a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as an ASD, Roadside Screening Device or RSD).

Police officer required Client to take a roadside screening test (also known as an Approved Screening Device or «ASD»).

Client gave samples of breath into an «Approved Screening Device» (or «ASD» or «RSD» or «Roadside Screening Device» which registered a FAIL.

Client failed a roadside screening test (also called an Approved Screening Device or «ASD» or a Roadside Screening Device or «RSD») and was arrested for impaired driving.

Client required to take a roadside screening test (also known as an Approved Screening Device or «ASD»).

Roadside license suspensions for drivers who get a «warn» on a roadside screening test, or whose breath test shows a blood alcohol level between.05 and.08 (50 to 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of blood) are: • 7 days for a first suspension within 10 years; • 15 days for a second suspension within 10 years; • 30 days for a third or subsequent suspension within 10 years.