Sentences with phrase «roadside screening device»

The Criminal Code provides strict requirements for roadside screening device and Breathalyzer demands.

The saliva samples were analyzed using two roadside screening devices, the Draeger DrugTest 5000 (DT5000) and Alere DDS2 (DDS2); these devices use THC cutoff points of 5 µg / L and 25 µg / L, respectively, to determine if someone is positive or negative for marijuana use.

In this case, the appellant had failed a roadside screening device test after being stopped by police; he provided samples of his breath at the police station, which registered readings significantly over the legal limit, and was charged with driving «over 80,» contrary to s. 253 of the Criminal Code.

As a result, the police demanded that Laura blow into a roadside screening device, which she failed.

He was arrested at the roadside for impaired driving, without the use of a roadside screening device test.

It is not against the law to fail a roadside screening device test, but failing this test will give the officer reasonable and probable grounds to detain the person and demand a formal breath or blood sample as soon as possible.

A roadside screening device is a portable instrument that is kept in many police cars.

An officer may have reasonable and probable grounds by taking into consideration any physicial signs of impairment or through the use of a «roadside screening device».

If someone is driving or has care and control of a motor vehicle and a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that he or she has alcohol in their body, the officer may demand that the person use a roadside screening device.

The Traffic Safety Act allows the provincial government to automatically suspend a person's licence if the person blows over».05» into the roadside screening device or refuses to blow.

Sometimes, for instance at a roadblock the police request a driver to provide a sample of breath into a handheld device commonly referred to as a «roadside screening device».

The client was asked to blow into a roadside screening device.

Basically, a Roadside Suspension can not be disputed unless you ask the police officer to administer a roadside screening device and he refused to do so.

Those errors can can mean that the roadside screening device and / or the breath machine can be wrong and the driver innocent.

As part of its decision, the board noted «a number of unorthodox aspects» to A.B.'s arrest, including the fact Woodburn didn't administer a roadside screening device and didn't end up having the lawyer undergo a breathalyzer test at the police station.

When Client drove out, despite showing no difficulties with either his driving or any of his behaviour, the Police demanded, and the Client gave, a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as the «ASD», the «RSD» or the Roadside Screening Device).

The police, not without their own failings, would determine the fate of any individual pulled over, or otherwise detained, to blow into a roadside screening device.

Upon police arrival he is required to give a sample of his breath into a roadside screening device (also known as an «Approved Screening Device» or an ASD).

Client stopped by police officer who demands Client supply a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as an ASD, Roadside Screening Device or RSD).

Client gave samples of breath into an «Approved Screening Device» (or «ASD» or «RSD» or «Roadside Screening Device» which registered a FAIL.

Client failed a roadside screening test (also called an Approved Screening Device or «ASD» or a Roadside Screening Device or «RSD») and was arrested for impaired driving.