One of the foundational commitments motivating The Ethics of Interrogation was that
robust debate among professionals is central to democratic practice, and so I welcome Mukasey's highly critical assessment of my book.
Not exact matches
«I welcome the
robust debate that can emerge with this wide spectrum of viewpoints
among the new members,» he said.
But then goes on to say «there is indeed a
robust, healthy, and respectful
debate among scientists when it comes to interpreting data and testing hypotheses».