Robust teacher evaluation systems can only lead to improved teacher quality if schools use the resulting data effectively.
Currently, 33 states have received waivers from the NCLB mandates by promising to implement
robust teacher evaluation.
Districts strategically develop common school - level improvement plans, aligning the personnel and fiscal support they provide to schools to match the priorities in these plans — e.g., plans that prioritize
a robust teacher evaluation system require district - level support for the implementation of an evaluation and professional growth framework.
A robust teacher evaluation model helps teachers improve their instruction over time, leading students to ever - higher achievement.
Federal involvement also carries political risks for private school choice, as the Obama administration learned through its efforts to promote Common Core standards and more
robust teacher evaluation systems.
These goals were central to the 2009 Race to the Top challenge grants, where a key component was incentivizing states to create
robust teacher evaluation policies.
Not exact matches
In the upcoming session, Cuomo has already hinted at a
robust education agenda that includes further strengthening
teacher evaluations and boosting the charter school sector.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Chandra M. Hayslett, Communications Director
[email protected] 212-257-4350 New Yorkers Overwhelmingly Want Deal on New
Teacher Evaluation System New Poll Shows Robust and Resilient Support; No Excuse Seen for Losing $ 300 million New York (Nov. 29, 2012)-- A new teacher evaluation system that would ensure that New York City received $ 300 million in additional State education funding enjoys overwhelming support among City voters in general and parents in particular, according to a new poll released today by StudentsFirstNY, the education reform advocacy group, and conducted by Anzalone Liszt Re
Teacher Evaluation System New Poll Shows Robust and Resilient Support; No Excuse Seen for Losing $ 300 million New York (Nov. 29, 2012)-- A new teacher evaluation system that would ensure that New York City received $ 300 million in additional State education funding enjoys overwhelming support among City voters in general and parents in particular, according to a new poll released today by StudentsFirstNY, the education reform advocacy group, and conducted by Anzalone Liszt
Evaluation System New Poll Shows
Robust and Resilient Support; No Excuse Seen for Losing $ 300 million New York (Nov. 29, 2012)-- A new
teacher evaluation system that would ensure that New York City received $ 300 million in additional State education funding enjoys overwhelming support among City voters in general and parents in particular, according to a new poll released today by StudentsFirstNY, the education reform advocacy group, and conducted by Anzalone Liszt Re
teacher evaluation system that would ensure that New York City received $ 300 million in additional State education funding enjoys overwhelming support among City voters in general and parents in particular, according to a new poll released today by StudentsFirstNY, the education reform advocacy group, and conducted by Anzalone Liszt
evaluation system that would ensure that New York City received $ 300 million in additional State education funding enjoys overwhelming support among City voters in general and parents in particular, according to a new poll released today by StudentsFirstNY, the education reform advocacy group, and conducted by Anzalone Liszt Research.
«Support for the new
teacher evaluation system is
robust and resilient, which sends a clear message that New Yorkers want to see a deal and won't accept excuses for inaction,» said Glen Weiner, deputy executive director for StudentsFirstNY.
First off, we need to immediately implement the
robust and comprehensive
teacher evaluation system created by Governor Cuomo.
StudentsFirstNY made a number of policy recommendations to address the findings of the report, including the implementation of a
robust and comprehensive
teacher evaluation system in accordance with State law.
Effective leadership is a pre-requisite for a successful school; in successful schools head
teachers and senior leaders understand the changing needs of their schools and their staff, continually communicate their ideals, vision and expectations, use
robust monitoring and
evaluation, balance support with challenge and plan ahead to sustain excellence.
Regardless, our results indicate that, under a
robust system of performance
evaluation, the turnover of
teachers can generate meaningful gains in student outcomes, particularly for the most disadvantaged students.
Yet
robust evaluations of NMSI's program, conducted by the economist Kirabo Jackson, show how incentivizing outcomes can powerfully affect both short - and long - term student outcomes, particularly when coupled with
teacher support (see «Cash for Test Scores,» features, Fall 2008).
The paper tackles what we are calling «infrastructure» or the foundation needed for states to use information about
teachers, 3 such as
robust data systems, professional standards for teaching, and rigorous
evaluation systems.
The assurances underlying ARRA underscore the importance of improving the usefulness of information on
teacher effectiveness through
robust data systems and rigorous
evaluation systems.
The DOE states that, «by implementing
robust and meaningful
teacher and principal
evaluations, we aim to improve
teacher quality and thus student outcomes.
The whole goal is to have a
robust, effective
teacher -
evaluation system to make
teachers better, and I'm still hopeful that's going to happen from what we're seeing across the country.
States and school districts that adopted Obama's preferred policies — like designing
teacher evaluation systems and using «
robust» data systems to track student progress — were given cash grants as an award.
Federal law in postsecondary education must also be a
robust source of support for local innovation, research, and implementation of strategies designed to improve
teacher and principal effectiveness and include: Evidence - based preparation and professional development; Evidence - based
evaluation systems that include, in part, student performance; Alternative certification programs that meet workforce needs; State and school district flexibility regarding credentials for small and / or rural schools, special education programs, English learners and specialized programs such as science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics; and Locally - determined compensation and
teacher and principal assignment policies.
In the still - prevalent one -
teacher - one - classroom model, few districts have provided a
robust, sustainably funded way to connect
teacher evaluation with career opportunities, and they continue to bump up against questions of fairness in
evaluation.
Because they have spent little on developing
robust data systems that can monitor student achievement and
teacher performance means (and thanks to state laws that had banned the use of student test score data in
teacher evaluations), districts haven't been able to help those aspiring
teachers by pairing them with good - to - great instructors who can show them the ropes.
Whatever
teacher evaluation model you use, embracing a
robust approach to instructional design provides
teachers and supervisors guidance for success.
Beginning in 2008, CPS piloted the Excellence in Teaching Project, a more
robust evaluation system that was the first step in moving beyond the rudimentary checkboxes that failed to delineate great teaching or to provide meaningful feedback to
teachers and administrators.
First off, we need to immediately implement the
robust and comprehensive
teacher evaluation system created by Governor Cuomo.
The amended version of AB 934 allows local districts and
teachers unions to negotiate an alternative dismissal system, eliminating the bill's previous language whereby an ineffective
teacher could be dismissed with due process after two negative
evaluations and a
robust professional development program.
The good news is that districts such as Long Beach and Garden Grove are successfully using student performance data as part of
robust and multifaceted
evaluations of their
teachers.
More
robust evaluations may soon be coming.To maintain accreditation by the Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation,
teacher training programs may soon have to issue regular reports on their graduates: Do they pass licensing tests?
Nevertheless, creating more
robust teacher and principal
evaluation systems will not, in isolation, lead to significant improvements in educator quality.
Teacher evaluation is undergoing a change in this country from perfunctory to more robust systems that attempt to accurately assess performance and provide feedback to support teacher
Teacher evaluation is undergoing a change in this country from perfunctory to more
robust systems that attempt to accurately assess performance and provide feedback to support
teacher teacher growth.
Districts must commit to implement an educator
evaluation system by the 2014 — 15 school year, use college - and career - ready standards and assessments, and establish
robust data systems that provide timely feedback to
teachers.
As will be discussed later, many states and districts use
teacher evaluation systems, particularly
teacher observation, to try to determine which instructional moves lead to increased student learning, but research has yet to definitively identify a consistent and
robust catalogue of specific practices that constitute effective teaching.
Robust models of
teacher accountability exist, and they emphasize the role of
teachers as professionals capable of engaging in substantive understanding of their own work and the role of
evaluation in supporting
teachers as its primary goal.
Aligned to The Interstate
Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC), the Marzano
Teacher Evaluation Model is
robust and thorough enough to help educators identify the «thin slices» of teaching behaviors that help them focus on specific areas for improvement.
«our results indicate that, under a
robust system of performance
evaluation, the turnover of
teachers can generate meaningful gains in student outcomes, particularly for the most disadvantaged students.
He hopes the ruling doesn't stifle efforts underway in some cities exploring creative approaches to tenure and
teacher evaluation, including adding more
robust peer and student reviews.
The authors conclude, ««our results indicate that, under a
robust system of performance
evaluation, the turnover of
teachers can generate meaningful gains in student outcomes, particularly for the most disadvantaged students.