The judge plays a critical
role in family court and how open they are to hearing from someone who has generally not been involved in the case up to the point of their testimony.
Not exact matches
Not only did they play a prominent
role in the imperial
court, they also rose to positions of high standing
in the church,
in the army,
in civil administration, and
in wealthy private
families.
Woozles: Their
Role in Custody Law Reform, Parenting Plans, and
Family Court.
Now Dr Linda Nielsen of Wake Forest University, North Carolina, enters the fray with Woozles: Their
role in custody law reform, parenting plans and
family court (3).
The Children and
Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the role of championing children's best interests in the family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the
Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the role of championing children's best interests in the family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the
Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the
role of championing children's best interests
in the
family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the
family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the
court system — so if you end up
in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the
court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the case.
Now, they're becoming insistent that their
role be respected
in family court and that the traditional stereotypes have to go,» says Joe Cordell, co-founder of a St. Louis - based law firm whose website notes its «dedication to leveling the playing field for men
in family law cases.»
Woozles: Their
role in custody law reform, parenting plans, and
family court.
In Iowa, if a couple (married or unmarried) has children in the family under the age of eighteen, the courts will play a role in making decisions related to child custod
In Iowa, if a couple (married or unmarried) has children
in the family under the age of eighteen, the courts will play a role in making decisions related to child custod
in the
family under the age of eighteen, the
courts will play a
role in making decisions related to child custod
in making decisions related to child custody.
In custody cases, most states» family courts allow a preference for the parent who can demonstrate that he or she was a child's primary caretaker during the course of marriage, or assumed that role in general if the parents are unmarrie
In custody cases, most states»
family courts allow a preference for the parent who can demonstrate that he or she was a child's primary caretaker during the course of marriage, or assumed that
role in general if the parents are unmarrie
in general if the parents are unmarried.
«We are talking about a two -
court structure, but we're still trying to figure out a way to balance the
role of judges
in these cases as well as the district attorneys»
role,» he said, adding, «There would be
family court for the less serious cases and a youth
court for the more serious cases.
That a significant number of troubled youths who pass through
Family Court are minorities suggests that a
role model
in what is now an all - white judiciary could be an asset.
Sprinkled around the crowd were Republicans, like onetime mayoral candidate Jean Jacobs, and Gallo's grass roots supporters, like the young men he'd represented
in his
role as a part - time
Family Court attorney.
«For the past half century,
Family Court has played a vital
role in resolving issues that so deeply affect children, parents and caregivers,» said New York State Bar Association President Seymour W. James, Jr. (The Legal Aid Society
in New York City).
However, counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, told the
court that «Bafarawa, his son and their
family company, Dalhatu Investment Limited, were properly joined with Dasuki, Bashiru Yuguda and Shuaibu Salisu for their joint
roles in the diversion of $ 2.1 billion arms funds»
«The task force is more than justified, more than earns its keep and plays a vital
role in keeping the system on its toes,» said former
Family Court Judge Gregory J. Blass, who chaired the task force until it ended
in 2011.
The paper published a piece yesterday about a domestic violence case
in Bronx
Family Court that involved one of Gov. David Paterson's top aides, and raised a number of questions about what
role the governor might have played
in the mess.
Malden is probably a little over the top
in his
role, but the movie gets a little more interesting as he
courts and then weds Colbert, bringing her and Donahue into the
family and hiring Donahue.
In one particular group, I have received a certain amount of kickback when I suggest that lawyers should play a larger role at the front end of family law disputes, in order to steer as many of those disputes away from court as possibl
In one particular group, I have received a certain amount of kickback when I suggest that lawyers should play a larger
role at the front end of
family law disputes,
in order to steer as many of those disputes away from court as possibl
in order to steer as many of those disputes away from
court as possible.
The
court's
role in family restructuring is to identify services and craft solutions that are appropriate for long - term stability and that minimize the need for subsequent
court action.
Kleinbard has represented the City of Philadelphia
in various matters, including
in connection with its
role in the development of the
Family Court Building.
That said, the
family courts do recognise the important
role that grandparents have to play
in their grandchildren's lives.
Part of the problem for participatory fathers, though, is that their
role in the
family is essentially a revocable parole,
in that
courts that have not adapted to the new realities: judges can — and all too frequently do — turn them into Mr. Every - Other - Weekend, no matter how extensive their former
role in the
family, results which seem to be coming from both the traditionalist and modern progressive sides of the bench.
For me, by far the most intriguing story
in the Review involved The Legal Reader's possible
role in the apprehension of Darren Mack, a
family court litigant accused of murdering his wife and shooting the judge assigned to his case.
The Ontario Superior
Court of Justice recently had the opportunity to review a lawyer's
role in the collaborative process when the husband
in a
family law matter (Mr. Elliott) brought a motion to have the lawyer acting for his ex removed as solicitor of record.
In Virginia, a court may consider any of the following factors, among others, in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatio
In Virginia, a
court may consider any of the following factors, among others,
in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatio
in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended
family members; the
role that each parent has played and will play
in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatio
in the future,
in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatio
in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate
in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatio
in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the
court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of
family abuse; and such other factors as the
court deems necessary and proper to the determination.
Those who've been following the recent legal news will have seen the remarkable disagreement between Dominic Grieve the Attorney General and the Home Secretary Theresa May on the
role of the Strasbourg
Court, with reference to a tabloid created fictitious story about a refugee claimant who established a claim by having a cat
in the
family.
Some lawyers are uncomfortable with the
role switcheroo, something they say the
Family Law Rules have rightly barred
in the
court system.
Westmoreland - Traoré also noted that as more people are now representing themselves
in court, «there may be a
role for graduates from law school
in assisting those who are unrepresented,» whether their cases are related to
family law, personal injury or other areas.
We'll hear about her
role in drafting the
court's opinions, as well as her current challenge: reentering law practice after taking time off for her
family.
This fact
in and of itself does not sit well with
family members because
in these type of claims the
family members, the insurance companies and the
courts really end up dissecting the
role of the deceased
in the
family unit.
Then came Edgerton v Edgerton and Shaikh [2012] EWCA Civ 181, [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Feb)
in which Lord Neuberger MR again —
in passing, only, on this occasion — consigned a
family lawyer's assumption to the same dustbin as «Hildebrand rules»: «[36][The judge below] thought that, as the
court in the ancillary relief proceedings had an inquisitorial, or quasi-inquisitorial (as Thorpe LJ put it
in Parra v Parra [2002] EWCA Civ 1886, para 22),
role, the normal rules as to issue estoppel did not apply.
«As needed» new courses, many developed with the NJI, included: the first course
in Canada designed to teach judges communication skills; a judgment writing course; the first child protection program; courses on managing domestic violence cases; special programs to teach leadership and management skills to judges assuming the administrative
roles within the
Court; and a «
family law primer» for Criminal Court judges who periodically sit in Family
family law primer» for Criminal
Court judges who periodically sit
in Family Family Court.
Perhaps this distinction is why some
courts might be tempted to try to re-cast a spouse's entitlement, to maximize the possibility that his or her valid
family law - related claim against the bankrupt spouse — essentially
in creditor / debtor
roles — will be more likely to be preserved and enforced after the bankruptcy.
To understand why it matters, it is important to appreciate the broad discretion
family court judges are afforded and the
role credibility plays
in shaping their decisions / rulings.
Eleanor played a significant
role, through legal research, and drafting,
in respect of responding to an application for permission to appeal to the
Court of Appeal
in Seddon v Oldham Council [2015] EWHC 2609 (Fam): a Human Rights Act claim
in which Mr Justice Peter Jackson declared that
family life between a birth mother and an adopted child is terminated upon the making of an adoption order.
The Judicial Studies Degree provides a formal academic setting
in which trial judges or juvenile and
family court judges can integrate technical studies of the judiciary with more academic ones
in an effort to provide an intellectual assessment of the
role of the American judiciary.
The
Court of Appeal further found that the trial judge made orders that went beyond the
role of a judge
in under the
Family Law Act.
In terms of openness, the media obviously has a critical
role to play and has argued that it should have unfettered access to the
family courts as a watchdog or «proxy for the public».
The focus here is on matters relating to children, but the consultation paper recognises the
family courts»
role in resolving financial issues and the far - reaching effects of their decisions.
This section explains the different
roles that social work professionals can take
in family court cases.
Instead, I recommend seriously redesigning
family court into a Family Transition Center, which provides structure and accountability in a non-adversarial manner to assist families and individuals seeking to change their relationships and / or their behavior, and a role for a non-adversarial family court judge for managing those few families for which it is nece
family court into a
Family Transition Center, which provides structure and accountability in a non-adversarial manner to assist families and individuals seeking to change their relationships and / or their behavior, and a role for a non-adversarial family court judge for managing those few families for which it is nece
Family Transition Center, which provides structure and accountability
in a non-adversarial manner to assist
families and individuals seeking to change their relationships and / or their behavior, and a
role for a non-adversarial
family court judge for managing those few families for which it is nece
family court judge for managing those few
families for which it is necessary.
Today's focus is on the
role of the
court, and what they generally look for
in family law cases involving PA..
Family and juvenile
courts play a key
role in out - of - home care practice, as they must approve all removals of children and case plans for children and
families.
The Ontario Superior
Court of Justice recently had the opportunity to review a lawyer's
role in the collaborative process when the husband
in a
family law matter (Mr. Elliott) brought a motion to have the lawyer acting for his ex removed as solicitor of record.
Role of Foster Parents
in Family Court (PDF - 275 KB) Children's Law Center of South Carolina (2014) Provides guidance to foster parents concerning their rights and responsibilities during protective custody and permanency planning hearings.
In the family court context, the consulting psychologists hired by parents or the guardians ad litem and custody evaluators assigned by the court play a pivotal role in protecting children's interest
In the
family court context, the consulting psychologists hired by parents or the guardians ad litem and custody evaluators assigned by the
court play a pivotal
role in protecting children's interest
in protecting children's interests.
In addition to her
role as mediator, she serves as custody conciliator for Montgomery County, PA
family court.
Following the birth, there remains a
role for
family courts to play
in setting legal parameters that protect the safety of unmarried mothers and their children through supervised visitation arrangements and legal enforcement services.
Those
courts are principally the Family Court of Australia, the Family Court of Western Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court («the Family Law Courts») although, particularly in rural areas, Local or Magistrates Courts also play a significant
courts are principally the
Family Court of Australia, the
Family Court of Western Australia and the Federal Magistrates
Court («the
Family Law
Courts») although, particularly in rural areas, Local or Magistrates Courts also play a significant
Courts») although, particularly
in rural areas, Local or Magistrates
Courts also play a significant
Courts also play a significant
role.
As the CCS is independent from the
Family Court and the Federal Magistrates» Court we do not have a role in enforcing court or
Court and the Federal Magistrates»
Court we do not have a role in enforcing court or
Court we do not have a
role in enforcing
court or
court orders.