Sentences with phrase «role of co2»

VS, for me as a layman who has followed this compelling thread from the first to the last post, what you are saying is: yes the Earth is warming, but in 2008 not differently as to the period of 1880 - 1935 and the (anthropogenic) role of CO2 in the warming process is not (yet) defined?

The first has to do with climate science — the portion of the climate we understand the best is probably the role of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.

I didn't «admit» that I had never heard of the role of CO2 in tree growth.

I have two points that I think are worth making on your very clear «walk through» of the likely role of CO2 in increased OHC.

I'm far less interested in the role of CO2 than it may seem, because I'm fairly convinced that it is H2O that is in full control of the situation (specially clouds) so my interest in the details of CO2 is more curiosity than concern.

In fact, your text contains the same level of supposition as the texts written by some warmistas concerning the role of CO2.

Your own sublime ignorance on all this became clear when you admitted here you had never heard of the role of CO2 in tree growth.

The climate models and the role of CO2 are based on this assumption, ie that there has been no natural climate change since before the end of the last Little Ice Age.

Especially when those periods do nothing to diminish the level of certainty we have as to the role of CO2 in warming the planet.

However, if most of the warming of that period was the result of natural variability, it does not cast doubt on the role of CO2 in the current warming of the planet.

After all, you have embraced everyone and every position that might cause some question to the role of CO2 in climate without any critical thinking.

To find out more about the role of CO2 warming the atmosphere and its sources, visit the Climate Change Indicators page.

So what we have here is a real lack of consensus in science regarding the role of CO2 and «global warming» in weather disasters.

Carbon taxes are coming... The carbon tax [is] the single most powerful tool for encouraging conservation of the planet's finite coal, oil and natural gas resources, and for diminishing the role of CO2 emissions in destroying the earth.

I found the early chapters to be among the clearest explanations of the greenhouse effect and the role of CO2.

It made the point that if Monckton wanted to belittle the role of CO2 in mediating the observed warming, it would be to his interest to overstate rather than understate the rate of CO2 increase.

I think his views might strongly diverge with Malcolm Roberts, and presumably yours, regarding the role of CO2, with his comments such as «I consider the «no such thing as a greenhouse effect» people to be wrong, and once again I will try to explain the reasons» See the full discussion at — http://www.drroyspencer.com/2016/07/the-warm-earth-greenhouse-effect-or-atmospheric-pressure/ and also, http://www.drroyspencer.com/2016/08/suggested-backyard-experiment-to-measure-the-greenhouse-effect-of-more-carbon-dioxide/

Later in his paper (pages 27 to 28) he raises total misconception of the role of CO2 and other so - called «greenhouse gases» in the Atmospheric «greenhouse effect».

That is why we know the role of CO2 in the climate so well — a long - lived, well mixed greenhouse gas stands out like a sore thumb.

Some, I believe, important new and radical issues on the role of CO2 v H2O can be found on John Brignell's website < www.numberwatch.co.uk > Please go on to the Forum there and read my recent Posts: - «Exploding The Myth of AGW (Hard Science Thanks To Dalton) & (Isaac Azimov To The Rescue)».

«The Secondary Role of CO2 and CH4 Forcing in Climate Change.»

Gradual understanding that the role of CO2 was artifactually exaggerated may lessen the fervor for political activism, and increase the desire to actually figure out how the climate works.

It was interesting, because behind the open discussion about global warming and climate change, there was a growing discussion about the actual role of CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

The IPCC underplay the role of CO2 in plant growth, but there's less focus on water because it requires discussion of natural cycles and patterns.

It is now very clear that you are fundamentally concerned with bolstering your prior commitment to the denial of the dominant role of CO2 forcing in modern climate change.

Al Gore, Flannary, Rudd, Brown, Obama, and others have misrepresented the role of CO2.

Whether that's important or not depends on the role of CO2 in the climate system, not on whether «ppm is a really small number, dude».

The role of CO2 and other GHG's in causing global warming is accepted as a fact by 97 % of climate researchers.

However, the role of CO2 in the photosynthesis process is the most important issue of CO2.

Meyer doesn't make any contentions with respect to the «greenhouse gas» role of CO2 except to agree it exists and is reasonably well settled (as opposed to entirely settled, btw) science.

So, JohnnyB, if you wish to refute the role of CO2 on atmospheric temperature, you ought to try and refute the role of the force of gravity on the planet Earth.

What he argues is that the agreed impact from the «greenhouse gas» role of CO2 is completely insufficient to support the magnitude of change predicted by AGW.

Once climate researchers develop better theories, it will guide them toward the set of true explanatory variables and the role of CO2 in climate change theories will be greatly diminished.

I was criticized for participating in the book «Slaying the Sky Dragon» but did so because they were tackling a question that few, including most of the skeptics, ignore; the actual role of CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

How to attack the actual deceit and real science denial of the knowing fraud of climate change based renewable energy extortion, in such a way that the law has to consider the facts of the actual fraud, not the unprovable asssertions on the role of CO2 in climate change or the reputaions of the academic PR men for the rackets that justify them, and detach the debate from the climate to focus on the facts of what is done in its name that can only make energy supply expensively worse in fact, FOR PROFIT.

If you were conversant on the subject, you would know that the ice core data support the role of CO2 in global warming.

R Gates, «No Capt., I simply read the latest research, which increasingly confirms the strong role of CO2 as a control knob for the climate, and the unparalleled (at least for some 55 million years) spike in GHG's that the HCV has caused.»

---- No Capt., I simply read the latest research, which increasingly confirms the strong role of CO2 as a control knob for the climate, and the unparalleled (at least for some 55 million years) spike in GHG's that the HCV has caused.

I simply read the latest research, which increasingly confirms the strong role of CO2 as a control knob for the climate, and the unparalleled (at least for some 55 million years) spike in GHG's that the HCV has caused.

You embarrass yourself when you say things like «It is impossible to explain how climate functions without taking the role of CO2 on temperature into account.»

Posted in Advocacy, Carbon, Development and Climate Change, Energy, Environment, Green House Gas Emissions, Information and Communication, IPCC, Lessons, Opinion, Pollution, Publication, Research Comments Off on IPCC Models Underestimate Role Of CO2 In Warming

The reason is much larger relative role of the CO2 radiative cooling compared to the NO radiative cooling under solar minimum conditions as confirmed by SABER / TIMED measurements (Mlynczak et al. 2010).

-- Have a look at the basic energy balance equations and the rising role of CO2.

Beck's work completely undermined their major claims and assumptions about the role of CO2 in Global Warming, then Climate Change, and now Climate Disruptions.

I saw some strange comments about the role of CO2 in tree rings growth above.

Be that as it may, the role of CO2 in dendrochronology is of interest and importance.

From a GHG - management perspective, it is crucial to understand the relative role of CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions as CH4 and N2O are more powerful GHGs than CO2 (34 and 298 times the global warming potential on a 100 - year timescale, respectively; Myhre et al. 2013).

Estimating the exact role of CO2 increase in the warming of the last 150 years depends on a well - known unknown, namely the amount of warming that would have occurred without the increase in CO2.

One factor increasing my confidence is the continuing pause in warming, and the pathetic sequence of excuses dreamt up to explain it, rather than face up to the reality that they have greatly overstated the role of CO2 and underestimated natural variation.

«The results of this review point to the extreme value of CO2 to all life forms, but no role of CO2 in any significant change of the Earth's climate.