Sentences with phrase «roots of the disagreements»

At the root of the disagreement about perfection, I think, is the fact that we sometimes forget that according to Christianity the purpose of moral imperatives is not to make people righteous, but to show them their sin (as Paul taught in Galatians).

At the root of the disagreement is Duncan's decisions to back efforts to pay teachers based on student performance.

In his excellent 1998 book, Fixing Urban Schools, he outlines the roots of disagreement among school reform advocates as between intrinsic and extrinsic reforms.

The root of my disagreement with Ekins and Forsyth thus concerns the legitimate extent of interpretation, which sits on top of a deeper disagreement not about the existence of parliamentary sovereignty, but about the nature of the doctrine.

Not exact matches

Compensation consultant Ann Bares says disagreements about levels of pay transparency are rooted in poor communication between those who pay and those who are paid.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

For Lasch, true populism is rooted in mutual respect, which demands that we hold ourselves and our fellow citizens to shared standards of conduct and discourse — a necessary precondition for both civil disagreement and a healthy body politic.

Such disagreements were rooted in the distinctive values of religious traditions, arising from the reinforcing effects of believing, behaving, and belonging.

As Yves Simon and Heinrich Rommen long ago demonstrated, there is room for disagreement within the tradition of natural law about how one envisions the role played by God as the author of human nature, or about the tortuous problem of culpability when there is deeply rooted perversity of basic inclinations.

Her research has investigated the roots of the political debates over race - conscious policies that profoundly affect meaningful opportunities for higher education, with a focus on the nature of persistent moral disagreement over affirmative action.

As James Baldwin once said, «we can disagree and still love each other, unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist.»

I think this absolutely lies (for many) at the root of our vehement disagreements.

What I have not yet seen is any discussion at all of any of the questions I just posed, including most pointedly the one about Briffa 2000 truncating data (which seems, to my latecomer eye, to be one of the main root causes of the present disagreement between you and McIntyre, leading ultimately to this blog post being posted by McIntyre).

Society faces very substantial scientific uncertainty, which is the root cause of the scientific disagreements.

This disagreement over the future of the international climate regime has been at the root of the repeated fights in the climate negotiations over the last two years.

The effects of everything I mention are the root cause of the disagreement between alarmists and deniers.

He claimed that van Woerkum's words supported his view (that science can't claim superiority in knowlegde), whereas I claimed that he also supported my view (that the root of the disgreement is not scientific in nature and that to «solve» such disagreements we have to discuss the underlying motivations).

However, if we dig a little deeper, we will see that many of these disagreements are rooted in one of three fundamental interaction styles.

This is because most of their disagreements are rooted in fundamental differences of lifestyle, personality, or values.