Sentences with phrase «rose from the dead in»

this is not in any way a criticism of your study but rather a exhortation to conclude any study back to it's origin and that is that Christ came, he was crucified and that he rose from the dead in fulfillment of prophecy.

some Elijah, «and others one of the prophets,» they meant that these men were believed to have risen from the dead in the person of Jesus, or in the case of Elijah that he had come back from heaven.

Whether or not Jesus died and rose from the dead in a real, literal, historical sense is THE question when it comes to Christianity.

Ironically, it is the orthodox Christian view of Jesus that remains the most radical of all that a first - century Jewish teacher described himself as the Son of God and rose from the dead in vindication of that claim.

Ichabod Crane rises from the dead in the 21st century and is pursued by the headless horseman, with lots of other occult and supernatural plot twists and nifty CGI.

Not exact matches

Before the «Dispensation of Grace» of God, by which we are saved through «Faith in Jesus Christ» as Lord and our personal Savior, Jesus Christ fulfilled the «Law of God» on our behalf during His ministry on earth, died on the «Holy Cross» for the «Remission of Our Sins» once and for all, descended to hell and defeated death, then rose from the dead on the third day bringing us «Eternal Life» and «Reconciliation» with God the Father!

In so doing, he has appeased His Holiness, Justice, and Wrath; He has conquered the enemy that we brought into the world by our rebellion, which is death itself, by rising from the dead and living and reigning as victorious King and Savior; and He has reconciled those who believe in Him to Himself that they may live life eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promiseIn so doing, he has appeased His Holiness, Justice, and Wrath; He has conquered the enemy that we brought into the world by our rebellion, which is death itself, by rising from the dead and living and reigning as victorious King and Savior; and He has reconciled those who believe in Him to Himself that they may live life eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promisein Him to Himself that they may live life eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promised!

Q. 4 It is only acceptable as an adult to believe childish Bronze Age mythology like talking snakes, the Red Sea splitting, water turning into wine by magic, mana falling from the sky, a man living in a whale's belly, a talking donkey, superhuman strength, a man rising from the dead and angels, ghosts, gods and demons in the field of:

I would love for one of you supposed «adults» who believe in imaginary things like satan and hell and men who rise from the dead to answer this.

Reality, Paul goes on to say in 1 Corinthians 15: 20 «but in fact, Christ has risen from the dead...».

Jesus suffers and is humiliated in his crucifixion by the Romans but rises from the dead to take his place in heaven.

all things were created by nothing with nothing and for nothing... that takes more faith than i have... i prefer to believe in Jesus Christ — the one and only who rose from the dead — the most astounding historical fact ever recorded; Christians don't have all the answers but as the author Don Miller noted: «I can no more understand the complexity of God than the pancakes I made for breakfast can understand the complexity of me»

Nobody in the history of humanity has ANYBODY EVER died... and «rose from the dead»... you guys are consumed by a fairy tale

Then, inconceivably, He rose from the dead to let us live and hope in Him.

But seriously folks... So what if their owners still believe in creationism, gods and devils, heaven and hell, magical powers, Noah's ark, people rising from the dead, angels, talking snakes, and virgin births.

So I believe it is not so much what I can prove that matters in the end, but what I can manifest of that truth, that Jesus is Lord, and that He rose from the dead.

So I believe in an absurdity, that Jesus rose from the dead?

I know the Jesus of the Bible exists in myth and legend, but as for a man - god who died and rose from the dead - seriously?

Let me get this straight: You believe that a couple of thousand years ago an invisible man in the sky impregnated a virgin girl in the middle east, had a half - god / half - man son who traveled around doing magic tricks, and then rose from the dead and is now constantly watching all of us to see if we'll get pie in the sky when we die?

Yes of course, they are far more confused than people who believe in verbally expressive faming shrubbery, snakes with the ability to speak, women who get pregnant miraculously, people who can do the aqua moon walk and zombies rising from the dead.

A man rising from the dead, a 10,000 year old Earth, the Red sea splitting, water being turned into wine, dead people being in a «heaven» and still influencing matters on Earth, etc..

16For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.

Considering that Jesus rose from the dead at about 6.00 pm on the Friday, as I expounded in my former essay entitled «How Could Jesus Spend Three Days and Three Nights in the Tomb?»

unicorns, satyrs, a leviathan that god defeated in battle, giants, virgin births, flat earths, and people rising from the dead.

Certainly you can see that the Bible's historical reliability, for millions of christians, is the basis for believing that Jesus really did rise from the dead, in history.

But Abraham speaks over the head of the rich man, over the heads of the Pharisees, in what sounds like a direct address to us church types who claim faith in a certain Galilean raised from the dead, «If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.»

Regarding Jesus, I believe that Jesus was God in the flesh, that He was born of a virgin, lived a sinless life, died on the cross, and rose again from the dead.

• After Germaine Greer said that freedom is the world's most dangerous idea, and sex columnist Dan Savage picked population control, newspaper columnist Peter (brother of Christopher) Hitchens declared on Australian TV that «the most dangerous idea in human history and philosophy remains the belief that Jesus Christ was the son of God and rose from the dead.»

When he rose from the dead he began a whole new life for human beings in God's grace.

I'm referring to historical facts about Jesus of Nazareth that scholars agree on - namely, that Jesus was crusified; he was buried in a tomb by a member of the Jewish sanhedrin; the tomb was found empty by some of his women followers; Jesus's deciples had experiences of Jesus alive from the dead; and the deciples began a movement that was so un-Jewish based on the belief that Jesus rose from the dead.

This time would confirm in them what they already believed to be true: that Jesus died for their sins, was raised from the dead and appeared to them in risen form.

As Johannes Weiss described it in his famous Book I of The History of Primitive Christianity, this doctrine centered in the belief that Jesus rose from the dead as the glorified, heavenly Messiah.

If a person believes that Jesus died on the cross for their sins, and rose again from the dead, but don't believe that by faith in Jesus they have life that can never be lost, are they justified?

If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not saved.

Or rather, as they would have said, it was the rebirth of the people of God, the rising of Israel from the dead, and they were in it.

Furthermore, the resurrected Lord Jesus does in fact affirm that it is written that Christ would suffer and rise from the dead (on) the third day (Luke 24:46), a declaration confirmed, at least, by Hosea 6:1 - 2, which tells of the Lord binding and reviving and raising up those He has smitten.

Does the New Testament, in asserting that Jesus is risen from the dead, mean that his death is not just an ordinary human death, but the judgment and salvation of the world, depriving death of its power?

I should be disposed to conclude that while the general tradition held that Christ «rose from the dead» (commonly understood to mean that he emerged from the tomb in which his body had been laid) it preserved also a genuine memory that on that Sunday morning his tomb was found broken open and to all appearance empty.

When they said, «He rose from the dead,» they took it for granted that his body was no longer in the tomb; if the tomb had been visited it would have been found empty.

I believe that the redemptive work of Jesus was so powerful that when He died on the cross and rose again from the dead, everything in heaven and on earth was swept up in His wake, was drawn after His lead, and was pulled onward and inward toward Him.

And I am not ashamed of the very good news, first shouted by another unlikely woman in another garden, and then echoed through the centuries in every corner of the earth, that Jesus Christ has risen from the dead!

From time to time she notes that «we can no longer believe» in traditional Judaism or Christianity - that is, in the notion of a personal God, or a Savior who rose from the dead, or personal immortality in the familiar seFrom time to time she notes that «we can no longer believe» in traditional Judaism or Christianity - that is, in the notion of a personal God, or a Savior who rose from the dead, or personal immortality in the familiar sefrom the dead, or personal immortality in the familiar sense.

«When they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels in heaven.»

We are forever putting conditions and qualifications on the love of God: «If you rid yourself of your racism, if you vote Democratic, if you accept Jesus as your savior, if...» Such conditional, achievement - oriented, self - made - men religion certainly doesn't need Jesus dying on the cross and rising from the dead to make itself plausible and reasonable in an achievement - oriented, you - get - what - you - deserve capitalistic culture.

I talked a bit more with her about this, and as it turns out, somehow, here in America, she had never been told (or had just never understood) that Jesus had already risen from the dead!!!

After taking her to some passages in the Gospels, and then to 1 Corinthians 15 (which Paul partly wrote to prove the resurrection has taken place), she said she now understood and believed that Jesus had already risen from the dead.

We who are left alive until the Lord comes shall not forestall those who have died; because... the Lord himself will descend from heaven; first the Christian dead will rise, then we who are left alive shall join them, caught up in clouds to meet the Lord in the air.

Then we started to talk about some of her questions, and in the process, she mentioned about how she knows Jesus is going to come again when He rises from the dead.

Writing on the situation in Zimbabwe, Ambrose Mayo states this clearly when he says: «With zeal all missionaries preached Christ crucified, risen from the dead and alive today.

but on the third day using his Power of Resurrection rose from the dead to claim his seat next to God in heaven, I mean next to himself since he was also God and then told the masses that he died for their sins, though oddly enough being God he could have simply absolved them of their sins and he really didn't die because he lives and is coming back to judge man based upon the original sins... but not sure if that would work since man can clearly kill a God with wood and nails... I know, I know confusing and likely to be labeled heresy... but debates about nomenclature and religion... i mean story telling... just don't mix.