Industry observers say the future is likely to bring a less
rosy scenario for coal and possibly for Peabody Energy as climate policies clamping down on emissions take hold.
Not exact matches
Smil has forced climate advocates to reckon with the vast inertia sustaining the modern world's dependence on fossil fuels, and to question many of the
rosy assumptions underlying
scenarios for a rapid shift to alternatives.
Even applying a reasonably generous valuation on the business, to reflect the assumption that ICON will bounce back to its LT average margin, it's obvious that the market has opted
for a
rosier scenario...
As with the Hell
scenario, the «low - risk»
scenario makes
for a
rosier short - term outlook.
Since the available hard data showed that polar bear populations have been soaring, not dropping, and since the hard data also show there has been no measurable global warming
for at least 18 years, the PBSG had to come up with a
scenario that would contradict this
rosy trend.
In a couple of posts last week — here and here — I laid out the brutal logic implied by the latest climate science (with credit to scientist Kevin Anderson
for stripping away the
rosy assumptions hiding in many of today's common climate
scenarios).
Great article however few people ever account
for the realities of owning rental income and you can't paint
rosy financial
scenarios like this unless of course you account
for these realities and risks... especially
for as long as you state here: