Our review system gives the reader
a rough idea of the book, but we do not spoil the fun by spilling all the juiciness of the book.
Not exact matches
Atheist Terry Eagleton wrote a review for the London Review
of Books entitled «Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching» that began with the memorable quote: «Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge
of the subject is the
Book of British Birds, and you have a
rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.»
I have
roughed out
ideas for a couple
of short
books.
No, to get a very
rough idea of the actual number
of books being sold, the sales ranking has to be dissected dynamically, with the same immediacy as the ranking being calculated.
No, for better or worse I am an impulsive, instinctive, intuitive writer, which means that when I begin writing a
book, I know a couple
of my key characters, though not well; I have a sense
of the feel
of the story, though not its specific events; I have a
rough timeframe in mind over which the story will take place; and I have a hazy
idea of where the main characters will end up.
Taking a look at similar self - published
books on the market will also give you a
rough idea of what to charge.
Book value per share gives you a
rough idea of the stock's asset value.
While the flights are
booked and we have a
rough idea of hotels and itinerary, that's where we are at this point.