Sentences with phrase «rule against disclosure»

However, most of the exceptions to the general rule against disclosure without consent set out in s. 7 (3) do not distinguish among different types of data; they permit the disclosure of any personal information as long as the conditions in the exception are met.

Not exact matches

That figure includes 487 individual cases of alleged insider trading, 365 for stock manipulation, 343 for violations of laws and rules related to financial disclosure, 196 for contempt of the regulatory agency, and another 94 for fraud against customers.

The Competition Bureau says lack of disclosure by bloggers and influencers could fall under its rules against misrepresentation and false advertising.

The 2004 election cycle saw a dramatic rise in the number and size of nonprofit organizations that bought TV ads, organized voter turnout drives and conducted political «education» campaigns that were effectively working on behalf of (or against) one candidate or party, and because they used «soft money» in the process, their donors weren't limited in how much they could give and didn't fall under the strict disclosure rules required when trying to influence an election.

LaBoy, Espada's government spokesman, said that the disclosure rules are being selectively enforced against Espada.

A coalition of the state's leading political public relations firms filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the state Joint Commission on Public Ethics, claiming its new rules requiring disclosure of outreach to editorial boards represents an unconstitutional expansion of the definition of «lobbying.»

This consent order concerns violations by Airtrade International, Inc., (Airtrade) an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by AirGorilla, LLC, (AirGorilla), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by BusinessJet Class, LLC (BusinessJet), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by American Travel Solutions, LLC (ATS), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by Fareportal, Inc. (Fareportal), an online airline ticket agent, of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by US Airways, Inc., of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

In a consent order issued on April 26, 2011, the Department assessed a $ 50,000 penalty against Airtrade for violating the code - share disclosure rule on its Internet web site.

This consent order concerns violations by Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by United Air Lines, Inc., (United) of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns Internet advertisements by Globester, LLC (Globester), that violated the Department's full - fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR Part 399, the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

Violations («Northwest») of the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

«We will continue to take enforcement action against airlines and ticket agents when they fail to comply with our code - sharing disclosure rules.»

Comment 16 to the rule requires a lawyer to «act competently to safeguard information relating to the representation of a client against inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure by the lawyer or other persons who are participating in the representation of the client or who are subject to the lawyer's supervision.»

«The client's right to be protected against the disclosure of their confidential communications with their lawyers is a cornerstone of the rule of law, and has existed for centuries.

The first question on appeal asked: Where there is no discovery violation or other misconduct, does the Rule 219 (e) prohibition against using the voluntary dismissal to avoid compliance with discovery rules, deadlines or orders, apply when the witness disclosure was untimely?

Ransomware is a choice weapon against legal firms, as attackers understand that firms are highly motivated to protect the confidentiality of their data as well as obligated by ABA Model Rules to make reasonable efforts to prevent disclosure or unauthorized access to client data.

James Bullock, head of litigation and compliance at Pinsent Masons, says: «LPP is a rule of evidence designed to protect individuals against disclosure to the court.

Before trial, the criminal law seeks to protect an accused from being conscripted against him - or herself by the confession rule, the right to remain silent in the face of state interrogation into suspected criminal conduct, and the absence of a duty of disclosure on the defence: R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151.

The proposal deals with the rules on disclosure of evidence, as the victims of infringements of antitrust rules often encounter difficulties in obtaining all the evidence necessary to start proceedings against the (alleged) undertakings causing the infringements.

(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)

The High Court has ruled that in a case against the state which did not directly affect the liberty of the subject, there was no irreducible minimum of disclosure of the state's case which the court would require.

That presumption can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that shows that all reasonable measures, as discussed in rule 3.4 - 20, have been taken to ensure that no disclosure will occur by the transferring lawyer to the member or members of the firm who are engaged against a former client.

If the medical system shifts predominantly to electronic records in the near future, accompanying privacy rules will become more critical to prevent unanticipated, inappropriate, or unnecessary uses or disclosures of individually identifiable health information without patient consent and without effective institutional controls against further dissemination.

The rule waives the requirement for individual agreement if the victim is unable to agree due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance and: (1) The law enforcement official represents that the protected health information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on such disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, determines that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

The final rule waives the requirement for agreement if the covered entity is unable to obtain the individual's agreement due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance, and (1) the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity determines, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

We would note that nothing in the final rule overrides Certificates of Confidentiality, which protect against the compelled disclosure of identifying information about subjects of biomedical, behavioral, clinical, and other research as provided by the Public Health Service Act section 301 (d), 42 U.S.C. 241 (d).

In the final rule we retitle the provision and include it in § 164.502 to reflect the fact that these disclosures are not made by the covered entity and therefore this material does not belong in the section on safeguarding information against disclosure.

Under the final rule, no special protection against disclosure is provided for peer review information of the type the commenter describes.

We combine the proposed requirements into a single standard that requires covered entities to safeguard protected health information from accidental or intentional use or disclosure that is a violation of the requirements of this rule Start Printed Page 82562and to protect against the inadvertent disclosure of protected health information to persons other than the intended recipient.

Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. Quest Diagnostics Inc., the Second Circuit upheld a Southern District of New York ruling which dismissed an action brought by the former general counsel of the defendant Unilab Corp., a wholly - owned subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics Inc., as well as his co-relators, Unilab's former CEO and CFO and disqualified them and their external counsel from bringing any subsequent related qui tam action seeking a whistleblower aware, on the basis that «such measures were necessary to prevent the use of [the former general counsel's] unethical disclosures against defendants.»

Ontario Superior Court Justice Ian Nordheimer ruled in R. v. Nestlé Canada Inc., that «settlement privilege» does not trump the Crown's disclosure obligations in a criminal prosecution against another party.

If the government actually wants to protect the public against Facebook abusing its power, it would need to go harder than the Honest Ads Act that would put political advertising on Internet platforms under the same scrutiny regarding disclosure of buyers as the rules for TV and radio advertising.

Previously, though, Facebook lobbied against more extensive political ad disclosure rules.

But, doesn't this proposal smack against the rules many of us learned in graduate programs about maintaining a professional posture: no self - disclosure, no physical touch with clients, no accepting any gifts?

In fact, the «rules» lawyers follow in this type of representation may prevent such disclosures as being against their client's interests.

Existing attempts to deal with the problem through government - mandated disclosures, rules against markups and prohibitions of referral fees have only added to the complexity of the process without preventing overcharges.

The court ruled that the Broker's confidentiality policy was contrary to the purpose of the property disclosure law and that the Buyer had sufficiently alleged a cause of action against the Broker for its failure to disclose the information from the earlier transaction.

On the other hand, when sellers or their agents have attempted to use the property condition disclosure forms to deceive or mislead purchasers, the courts have been equally swift in ruling against them.

Editor's Note: Following the ruling in favor of the Challenger on the due process claims, the court entered a permanent injunction against the State from making the public disclosures required in the Law and also granted the Challenger's motion for class certification (see Doe v. Lee, No. 3:99 CV314 (RNC), 2001 WL 536729 (D. Conn..

If there is a subsequent sale of the property and the licensee, who is the principal shareholder of ABC Mortgage Corporation which holds the mortgage registered against the property, is not providing trading services to the seller and buyer of the property and has no knowledge of the sale, that licensee would not be required to make disclosure in accordance with section 5 - 9 of the Rules.

The appellate court ruled against the buyers» contention that the rep had failed to meet the obligations for fiduciary duty listed in the agency disclosure form they had signed.